Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
62 Beiträge 50 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • kiri@fosstodon.orgK kiri@fosstodon.org

    @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

    acm_redfox@jawns.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
    acm_redfox@jawns.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
    acm_redfox@jawns.club
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #25

    @kiri @sundogplanets laser guns for the AI uprising...

    iams@mastodon.socialI 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • lexinova@cyberplace.socialL lexinova@cyberplace.social

      @sundogplanets may be a blessing in desguise, i mean if (when) they fuck up, it will (force) the US to clean their mess by inventing tech to clean out there (if scientifically possible i'm not well known in space physic).

      shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      shaknais@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #26

      @lexinova @sundogplanets

      You are way more optimistic than I.
      They'd just argue over who is responsible and do nothing until we're Kessler'd.

      lexinova@cyberplace.socialL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

        @lexinova @sundogplanets

        You are way more optimistic than I.
        They'd just argue over who is responsible and do nothing until we're Kessler'd.

        lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lexinova@cyberplace.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #27

        @shaknais @sundogplanets more pragmatic, if half internet crash and some comunication become imposible, the pressure from both international entity and their own citizen will be so high they cannot do nothing.

        The cost on the other end will cripple their economy, because clearning space will not be cheap

        shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • lexinova@cyberplace.socialL lexinova@cyberplace.social

          @shaknais @sundogplanets more pragmatic, if half internet crash and some comunication become imposible, the pressure from both international entity and their own citizen will be so high they cannot do nothing.

          The cost on the other end will cripple their economy, because clearning space will not be cheap

          shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          shaknais@mastodon.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #28

          @lexinova

          Most of the internet is underground, not over your head. There would be little impact on that front.

          And what sattelites there are, are at different orbit heights than the proposal, limiting the impact further.

          lexinova@cyberplace.socialL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

            @lexinova

            Most of the internet is underground, not over your head. There would be little impact on that front.

            And what sattelites there are, are at different orbit heights than the proposal, limiting the impact further.

            lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lexinova@cyberplace.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #29

            @shaknais actually some internet comunication are handled by satelite, and many TV channel too, but yeah majority are sea cable.

            but the GSM network use it quite often actually so goodbye 4G and 5G in many region, the tower will still emit it, but it might be isolated from the network (as not all tower in all country are fibered).

            shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM mmcknett@hachyderm.io

              @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

              Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

              doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
              doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
              doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.place
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #30

              @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets
              There's also the problem that computers running in space must be more resistant to radiation than the ones we use down here.
              The chips used there are different (and slower), use bigger semiconductor scale.

              AFAIK this just can't work, even aside from the issue of having a million additional satellites...

              (see https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/)

              mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.place

                @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets
                There's also the problem that computers running in space must be more resistant to radiation than the ones we use down here.
                The chips used there are different (and slower), use bigger semiconductor scale.

                AFAIK this just can't work, even aside from the issue of having a million additional satellites...

                (see https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/)

                mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                mmcknett@hachyderm.io
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #31

                @Doomed_Daniel oh yeah, I can’t believe I forgot they have to be radiation-hardened, too!

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • acm_redfox@jawns.clubA acm_redfox@jawns.club

                  @kiri @sundogplanets laser guns for the AI uprising...

                  iams@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iams@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  iams@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #32

                  @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                  kiri@fosstodon.orgK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • iams@mastodon.socialI iams@mastodon.social

                    @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                    kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kiri@fosstodon.org
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #33

                    @iams
                    Lmao
                    @acm_redfox @sundogplanets

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • kiri@fosstodon.orgK kiri@fosstodon.org

                      @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

                      lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lauerhahn@sfba.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #34

                      @kiri @sundogplanets It doesn't have to work. It just has to trick rich people into thinking it might work.

                      kiri@fosstodon.orgK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                        zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                        zakalwe@plasmatrap.com
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #35

                        @sundogplanets@mastodon.social A milliuon satellites is utterly barking insane. Based on the rate they're burning out GPU/VPUs in AI datacenters, my rough estimate is they're going to need 140 Falcon 9 launches PER DAY just to sustain the constellation. A million satellites that need replacement every 18 months on average?

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                          https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                          Comments due March 6.

                          I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                          uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          uwehalfhand@norcal.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #36

                          @sundogplanets But SpaceX will “scal[e] to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!” How could you possibly be against that?!?

                          Yeah, it’s batshit crazy, Musk is hyping for IPO (although I don’t know if he believes it himself… he’s huffed his own farts a few times too many). I’ll be astonished if more than, I dunno, a few dozen ever get launched. By that point, it should be clear what a stupid idea it is.

                          vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU uwehalfhand@norcal.social

                            @sundogplanets But SpaceX will “scal[e] to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!” How could you possibly be against that?!?

                            Yeah, it’s batshit crazy, Musk is hyping for IPO (although I don’t know if he believes it himself… he’s huffed his own farts a few times too many). I’ll be astonished if more than, I dunno, a few dozen ever get launched. By that point, it should be clear what a stupid idea it is.

                            vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                            vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                            vatvslpr@c.im
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #37

                            @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                            I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                            uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU naught101@mastodon.socialN 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                              @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                              I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                              uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                              uwehalfhand@norcal.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #38

                              @VATVSLPR @sundogplanets Yeah, I think you’re right. It’s some crazy tapdancing, I’m just not sure how much of it Musk believes himself… I’d be prepared to believe any number between 0 and 100%

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                Comments due March 6.

                                I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                oldoldcojote@climatejustice.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oldoldcojote@climatejustice.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                oldoldcojote@climatejustice.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #39

                                @sundogplanets

                                If other countries have any sense, they'll shoot them down after notifying the UN whatever pertinent commitee.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                  Comments due March 6.

                                  I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                  naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  naught101@mastodon.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #40

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                                    @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                                    I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                                    naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    naught101@mastodon.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #41

                                    @VATVSLPR @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets like a stupidity ponzi scheme. Using the first stupid as a down-payment on future stupid.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • lauerhahn@sfba.socialL lauerhahn@sfba.social

                                      @kiri @sundogplanets It doesn't have to work. It just has to trick rich people into thinking it might work.

                                      kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kiri@fosstodon.org
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #42

                                      @lauerhahn Fair point!

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                        https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                        Comments due March 6.

                                        I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                        anja@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        anja@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        anja@chaos.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #43

                                        @sundogplanets Another huge distraction from the real challenges we face as a humanity?

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.to
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #44
                                          Our economy never served the public. It is by definition in service to the financial system. Our society on the other hand has at times served the public. Forget the economy, embrace society, and the people with a million spacebux will lose all their power over you.

                                          If only I could convince everyone else to do that too...

                                          CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum