Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
62 Beiträge 50 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • kiri@fosstodon.orgK kiri@fosstodon.org

    @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

    mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    mmcknett@hachyderm.io
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #22

    @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

    Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

    six_grandfathers_mountain@mastodon.socialS doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

      bamfic@autonomous.zoneB This user is from outside of this forum
      bamfic@autonomous.zoneB This user is from outside of this forum
      bamfic@autonomous.zone
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #23

      @sundogplanets https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vcjhk6pveljuwujipu56ggau/post/3me37lcvh6s22

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM mmcknett@hachyderm.io

        @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

        Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

        six_grandfathers_mountain@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        six_grandfathers_mountain@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        six_grandfathers_mountain@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #24

        @mmcknett @kiri
        RE
        constrained..reject heat, in space.. It’s stupid...
        data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement

        @sundogplanets
        RE
        fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use #satellites for centuries

        Anything #SpaceX wants is probably crap bc #ElonMusk is the guy driving the bus

        And another way to destroy the use of space satellite tech is to have #WW3 which is what will only make big tech richer, 🥵

        @nomdeb
        Thx 4 orig Prof. Sam boost

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • kiri@fosstodon.orgK kiri@fosstodon.org

          @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

          acm_redfox@jawns.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
          acm_redfox@jawns.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
          acm_redfox@jawns.club
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #25

          @kiri @sundogplanets laser guns for the AI uprising...

          iams@mastodon.socialI 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • lexinova@cyberplace.socialL lexinova@cyberplace.social

            @sundogplanets may be a blessing in desguise, i mean if (when) they fuck up, it will (force) the US to clean their mess by inventing tech to clean out there (if scientifically possible i'm not well known in space physic).

            shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            shaknais@mastodon.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #26

            @lexinova @sundogplanets

            You are way more optimistic than I.
            They'd just argue over who is responsible and do nothing until we're Kessler'd.

            lexinova@cyberplace.socialL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

              @lexinova @sundogplanets

              You are way more optimistic than I.
              They'd just argue over who is responsible and do nothing until we're Kessler'd.

              lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lexinova@cyberplace.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #27

              @shaknais @sundogplanets more pragmatic, if half internet crash and some comunication become imposible, the pressure from both international entity and their own citizen will be so high they cannot do nothing.

              The cost on the other end will cripple their economy, because clearning space will not be cheap

              shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • lexinova@cyberplace.socialL lexinova@cyberplace.social

                @shaknais @sundogplanets more pragmatic, if half internet crash and some comunication become imposible, the pressure from both international entity and their own citizen will be so high they cannot do nothing.

                The cost on the other end will cripple their economy, because clearning space will not be cheap

                shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shaknais@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shaknais@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #28

                @lexinova

                Most of the internet is underground, not over your head. There would be little impact on that front.

                And what sattelites there are, are at different orbit heights than the proposal, limiting the impact further.

                lexinova@cyberplace.socialL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • shaknais@mastodon.socialS shaknais@mastodon.social

                  @lexinova

                  Most of the internet is underground, not over your head. There would be little impact on that front.

                  And what sattelites there are, are at different orbit heights than the proposal, limiting the impact further.

                  lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lexinova@cyberplace.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #29

                  @shaknais actually some internet comunication are handled by satelite, and many TV channel too, but yeah majority are sea cable.

                  but the GSM network use it quite often actually so goodbye 4G and 5G in many region, the tower will still emit it, but it might be isolated from the network (as not all tower in all country are fibered).

                  shaknais@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM mmcknett@hachyderm.io

                    @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

                    Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

                    doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.place
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #30

                    @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets
                    There's also the problem that computers running in space must be more resistant to radiation than the ones we use down here.
                    The chips used there are different (and slower), use bigger semiconductor scale.

                    AFAIK this just can't work, even aside from the issue of having a million additional satellites...

                    (see https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/)

                    mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.placeD doomed_daniel@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets
                      There's also the problem that computers running in space must be more resistant to radiation than the ones we use down here.
                      The chips used there are different (and slower), use bigger semiconductor scale.

                      AFAIK this just can't work, even aside from the issue of having a million additional satellites...

                      (see https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/)

                      mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mmcknett@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mmcknett@hachyderm.io
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #31

                      @Doomed_Daniel oh yeah, I can’t believe I forgot they have to be radiation-hardened, too!

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • acm_redfox@jawns.clubA acm_redfox@jawns.club

                        @kiri @sundogplanets laser guns for the AI uprising...

                        iams@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iams@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iams@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #32

                        @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                        kiri@fosstodon.orgK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • iams@mastodon.socialI iams@mastodon.social

                          @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                          kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kiri@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kiri@fosstodon.org
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #33

                          @iams
                          Lmao
                          @acm_redfox @sundogplanets

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • kiri@fosstodon.orgK kiri@fosstodon.org

                            @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

                            lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lauerhahn@sfba.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lauerhahn@sfba.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #34

                            @kiri @sundogplanets It doesn't have to work. It just has to trick rich people into thinking it might work.

                            kiri@fosstodon.orgK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                              zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zakalwe@plasmatrap.com
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #35

                              @sundogplanets@mastodon.social A milliuon satellites is utterly barking insane. Based on the rate they're burning out GPU/VPUs in AI datacenters, my rough estimate is they're going to need 140 Falcon 9 launches PER DAY just to sustain the constellation. A million satellites that need replacement every 18 months on average?

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                Comments due March 6.

                                I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                uwehalfhand@norcal.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #36

                                @sundogplanets But SpaceX will “scal[e] to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!” How could you possibly be against that?!?

                                Yeah, it’s batshit crazy, Musk is hyping for IPO (although I don’t know if he believes it himself… he’s huffed his own farts a few times too many). I’ll be astonished if more than, I dunno, a few dozen ever get launched. By that point, it should be clear what a stupid idea it is.

                                vatvslpr@c.imV 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU uwehalfhand@norcal.social

                                  @sundogplanets But SpaceX will “scal[e] to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!” How could you possibly be against that?!?

                                  Yeah, it’s batshit crazy, Musk is hyping for IPO (although I don’t know if he believes it himself… he’s huffed his own farts a few times too many). I’ll be astonished if more than, I dunno, a few dozen ever get launched. By that point, it should be clear what a stupid idea it is.

                                  vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  vatvslpr@c.imV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  vatvslpr@c.im
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #37

                                  @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                                  I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                                  uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU naught101@mastodon.socialN 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                                    @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                                    I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                                    uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    uwehalfhand@norcal.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    uwehalfhand@norcal.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #38

                                    @VATVSLPR @sundogplanets Yeah, I think you’re right. It’s some crazy tapdancing, I’m just not sure how much of it Musk believes himself… I’d be prepared to believe any number between 0 and 100%

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                      Comments due March 6.

                                      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                      oldoldcojote@climatejustice.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      oldoldcojote@climatejustice.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                      oldoldcojote@climatejustice.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #39

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      If other countries have any sense, they'll shoot them down after notifying the UN whatever pertinent commitee.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                        https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                        Comments due March 6.

                                        I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                        naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        naught101@mastodon.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #40

                                        @sundogplanets

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • vatvslpr@c.imV vatvslpr@c.im

                                          @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets
                                          I think it's more about justifying the purchase of xAI, which otherwise makes no sense, not that orbital data centers make the tiniest bit of sense. It's part of a pattern of Musk using one of his companies to buy another to protect him from the shame of the purchased company going belly up. See Tesla/Solar City and xAI/X for previous examples. Don't be surprised if Neuralink is next.

                                          naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          naught101@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          naught101@mastodon.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #41

                                          @VATVSLPR @UweHalfHand @sundogplanets like a stupidity ponzi scheme. Using the first stupid as a down-payment on future stupid.

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum