Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
uspoltrumpinsurectionact
119 Beiträge 65 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org

    @2legged
    SCOTUS ruled that he can basically do whatever he wants as long as he is doing it within the scope of what he "believes" he is his job.

    But more importantly, Chump controls DOJ and DOD which Congress has to use to enforce their impeachment as their only other enforcement arm is the Sergeant At Arms

    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
    2legged@mastodon.ie
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #61

    @nikatjef So you can't identify any specific judgment, and you offer zero evidence that the courts would ignore a conviction at impeachment.

    I get why you are v worried, but if you want to make a serious contribution to a discussion about the actions of a court, that needs identifiable rulings.

    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

    nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

      @lukeryanps

      I'm interested in the idea of self-correction - from here it looks like the forces with & behind Trump are seeking to ensure such a self-correction is not possible.... are you saying that is a misapprehension?

      flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      flisty@mstdn.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #62

      @ChrisMayLA6 @lukeryanps personally (again, UK so this might look different locally), I've watched this building for decades. Bush v Gore. Gerrymandering and voter discouragement. Education decisions in red states. Militarisation of the police. Everything Mitch McConnell ever touched. Citizens United.
      Self-correcting will take a heck of a lot more than voting in a Democrat (otherwise Biden would have been enough). It will take decades of work and electeds willing to make radical change.

      G tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mattrog@mastodon.me.ukM mattrog@mastodon.me.uk

        @ChrisMayLA6 since he came to power this time I have been sure that by the end of his term they would be at war and he would pause the elections until it was "resolved".
        "I'm just doing what Ukraine did and you all supported that .. "

        tooden@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tooden@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tooden@aus.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #63

        @Mattrog Ah, but is that in the U.S. Constitu...never mind. @ChrisMayLA6

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

          From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

          I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

          (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

          #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          spacelifeform@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #64

          @ChrisMayLA6

          It is both. The media is complicit. Trump needs to go.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mattrog@mastodon.me.ukM mattrog@mastodon.me.uk

            @ChrisMayLA6 since he came to power this time I have been sure that by the end of his term they would be at war and he would pause the elections until it was "resolved".
            "I'm just doing what Ukraine did and you all supported that .. "

            peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
            peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
            peterbrown@mastodon.scot
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #65

            @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 the difference is the constitution of Ukraine prohibits the operation of elections under martial law (war)
            Whereas the US Constitution prohibits the cancellation of elections under any circumstances.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

              @nikatjef So you can't identify any specific judgment, and you offer zero evidence that the courts would ignore a conviction at impeachment.

              I get why you are v worried, but if you want to make a serious contribution to a discussion about the actions of a court, that needs identifiable rulings.

              @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

              nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
              nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #66

              @2legged
              I am referring to the Trump vs United States from 2024. Here is a discussion about it;
              https://www.scu.edu/government-ethics/resources/trump-v-united-states-and-the-ethics-of-presidential-immunity

              @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

              2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                @lukeryanps

                I'm interested in the idea of self-correction - from here it looks like the forces with & behind Trump are seeking to ensure such a self-correction is not possible.... are you saying that is a misapprehension?

                lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                lukeryanps@toot.community
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #67

                @ChrisMayLA6 The threats are real and the risks are high, but Trump is krazy. Wall St. has done well with tax cuts, but the (theoretical) interest rate caps, corporate profit caps, corporate pay caps, general uncertainty, geopolitical uncertainty, and increasing toxicity of Trump and MAGA politics mean the backlash is going to be spectacular (just from the powers that be). Protests and violence can be magnified or diminished at will by corporate media. Trump's coalition is diffuse and thinning.

                tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                  @nikatjef So you can't identify any specific judgment, and you offer zero evidence that the courts would ignore a conviction at impeachment.

                  I get why you are v worried, but if you want to make a serious contribution to a discussion about the actions of a court, that needs identifiable rulings.

                  @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                  nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #68

                  @2legged
                  Please note that I never said the courts would ignore the conviction, only that the corrupt SCOTUS granted the president extreme authority, but the court lacks the ability to enforce their decisions and Chump has demonstrated multiple times that he will simply ignore the courts, laws, and even the constitution of the US as he chooses.

                  @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                    From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                    I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                    (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                    #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                    bigtittybimbo@kolektiva.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bigtittybimbo@kolektiva.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bigtittybimbo@kolektiva.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #69

                    @ChrisMayLA6 i think @AnarchoNinaWrites was right, it wont be a civil war as that implies branches of civil government in armed struggle. More than likely it'll be some form of militarised crackdown with an insurgency resisting.

                    Realistically that detail is by-the-by, the angling is clear for the insurrection act, and some form of armed crackdown on civil liberties will likely follow. Perhaps a war in greenland to keep powerful members of the armed forces busy while this is ongoing, with a view to the trump dynasty fleeing to Qatar in the event things look dire.

                    tarnport@mastodon.greenT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                      From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                      I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                      (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                      #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                      justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justtoodd@nerdculture.de
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #70

                      @ChrisMayLA6 I'll tell you the same thing I've been telling a bunch of right wing neighbors for the past 3-5 years: no, I don't think we're facing an inevitable civil war. They're fewer now, but I still possible off-ramps.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                        From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                        I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                        (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                        #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                        claralistensprechen3rd@friendica.myportal.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        claralistensprechen3rd@friendica.myportal.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        claralistensprechen3rd@friendica.myportal.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #71

                        @ChrisMayLA6 If the US media is doing anything, it's downplaying such events, and Trump has telegraphed that he covets the Insurrection Act as much as he covets a Nobel Peace Prize. The younger protesting set has no direct memory of the Lunch Counter Protests that launched the Civil Rights actions of the 50s and 60s, but the advice they're getting from their elders was indeed successfully implemented back then--Never strike back, but firmly hold your ground no matter what brickbats are thrown your way. One bit of payback coming from you results in an excuse for them.

                        This was true back then and it remains true today.

                        john_loader@ohai.socialJ 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org

                          @2legged
                          I am referring to the Trump vs United States from 2024. Here is a discussion about it;
                          https://www.scu.edu/government-ethics/resources/trump-v-united-states-and-the-ethics-of-presidential-immunity

                          @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                          2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                          2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                          2legged@mastodon.ie
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #72

                          @nikatjef The article at https://www.scu.edu/government-ethics/resources/trump-v-united-states-and-the-ethics-of-presidential-immunity/ doesnt mention the word impeach. Not even once.

                          @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • tokensane@mastodon.me.ukT tokensane@mastodon.me.uk

                            @ChrisMayLA6 I read a piece some time ago saying that the second US civil war won't be armies and set-piece battles, it will be more like the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and the Irish independence fight before that: death squads at midnight, car bombs, kneecapping. Things are developing right along that trajectory at the moment. It's going to get worse before it gets better. Sorry.

                            anne_twain@theblower.auA This user is from outside of this forum
                            anne_twain@theblower.auA This user is from outside of this forum
                            anne_twain@theblower.au
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #73

                            @tokensane @ChrisMayLA6 Definitely not pitched battles.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • crowsinger@wandering.shopC crowsinger@wandering.shop

                              @ChrisMayLA6 @lukeryanps I think we will be very fortunate if there are elections this year, and too many people are still clinging to that as of things are normal

                              morgawr@bookstodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                              morgawr@bookstodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                              morgawr@bookstodon.com
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #74

                              @Crowsinger @ChrisMayLA6 @lukeryanps People say 'Trump can't cancel elections, it's against the law', forgetting that Trump is a terrorist, who doesn't care about the law. He'll cheat as much as anyone has ever cheated before, even if it means staging another bloody-coup.

                              luuk_aalders@mastodon.nlL sibrosan@mastodon.socialS tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • H h4890@alive.bar

                                @Stevenheywood @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                This is the truth. People have to stop pretending, and to realize that between nations, there can only be force or the threat of force.

                                Should they so choose, there can of course be cooperation, but at the end of the day, there is a reason we call them sovereign nations.

                                Become a political realist, and gain the benefit of not being particularly surprised at how Trump is acting or what he is doing.

                                Add to that, the realization that he is a business man, and you will no longer be surprised by anything he does, and you will easily be able to predict what he will do.

                                chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                                chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                                chrismayla6@zirk.us
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #75

                                @h4890 @Stevenheywood @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog

                                One of the reasons Political Realism in International Relations (the discipline) remains attractive is exactly this issue; in the end there is always power politics... but the reasons other approaches also gained ground & continue to appeal, is that Realism is a very thin description of what actually happens from day to day in the global sphere - the most compelling approaches combine both views

                                alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA H 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • pattykimura@beige.partyP pattykimura@beige.party

                                  @ChrisMayLA6

                                  Into the unknown both hope and fear reside.

                                  As a 3rd generation American, LGBTQ, person of color living in the very rural part of the likely bluest state, I don't experience the US as on the precipice of Civil War. However, I am not so sanguine that we won't end up there, anything is possible.

                                  The US is a massive nation. I grew up on the farthest West state, Hawai'i, the newest state in the Union, and now live in one of the original and oldest states - Massachusetts. There are MAGA here, but they are outnumbered. Massachusetts is very blue. But because we are so geographically isolated, to survive, our local culture is a balance of self-sufficiency and interdependence both Blue and Red. Armed conflict would be an irrevocable breach of rural local identity. And because we are rural, lots of folks hunt and have guns, even Democrats. So if this devolves into armed conflict rural Blue New England won't go without a fight.

                                  There are lots of serial flashpoints, and those get media, which is what you see overseas. But know this is Trump's standard - one flashpoint at a time, so far. Trump does not appear to have the troops, organization, discipline or ability to manage a national civil war. And no other fascist ambitious current MAGA leader has the engendered cult loyalty and charisma to trigger and win a Civil War.

                                  I actually believe the opposite about Trump's power - I believe he peaked on July 4 2025 with his substantial budget bill destruction of significant parts of the US (w Congressional MAGA complicity) and his greatest win has actually triggered his downhill slide and he's is angry, desperate, in denial, fuminating and at his most chaotic dangerous recklessness as he tries to erase the inevitable fate that he is seeing awaits him. But time, gravity, and history are now his inescapable enemies. He will get worse, and his minions worsen, but he's no longer inevitable. You can see it in the those polls on his cratering popularity, and on the MAGA who are abandoning their Congressional seats. Corporate media here and over there are both trailing, not leading, indicators. They missed the trends that brought Trump to power, they are missing the trends that signal his end.

                                  nomenloony@nomenloony.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nomenloony@nomenloony.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nomenloony@nomenloony.com
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #76

                                  @pattykimura @ChrisMayLA6 I truly hope you're right, not just for your people but for world peace because one man, voted in by the stupid crayon eaters is undoing work that took years to do. The USA is a laughing stock around the world because of him and his MAGA hard of thinking cronies.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                                    From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                                    I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                                    (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                                    #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                                    radundtat@berlin.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    radundtat@berlin.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    radundtat@berlin.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #77

                                    @ChrisMayLA6 Not on the other side, but it seems clear to me that this follows the "revolutionary" playbook of forcing crises in order to justify violent responses. In a country with millions of guns, this can only go badly.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • lukeryanps@toot.communityL lukeryanps@toot.community

                                      @ChrisMayLA6 The media distortion is very real. US will self-correct in the next election cycle, but my primary fear is that China and Russia will not let this opportunity slip away. The US/world has never been more vulnerable. I think the Taiwan and Baltic escalations will be after the US elections, like in late November or December. NATO will be sans US by then, but Europe can handle Russia.

                                      seb321@toot.communityS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      seb321@toot.communityS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      seb321@toot.community
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #78

                                      @lukeryanps @ChrisMayLA6 this is, I fear, wishful thinking.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                                        @h4890 @Stevenheywood @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog

                                        One of the reasons Political Realism in International Relations (the discipline) remains attractive is exactly this issue; in the end there is always power politics... but the reasons other approaches also gained ground & continue to appeal, is that Realism is a very thin description of what actually happens from day to day in the global sphere - the most compelling approaches combine both views

                                        alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alex_p_roe@mastodon.world
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #79

                                        @ChrisMayLA6 @h4890 @Stevenheywood @2legged @Mschatelaine @EvelineSulman @Mattrog Yup, regardless of laws, norms, conventions etc etc, at the end of the day, it’s all down to how someone behaves and being given the go ahead to do what you like by the highest court in the land can influence how one behaves as we have seen - are seeing.

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • bigtittybimbo@kolektiva.socialB bigtittybimbo@kolektiva.social

                                          @ChrisMayLA6 i think @AnarchoNinaWrites was right, it wont be a civil war as that implies branches of civil government in armed struggle. More than likely it'll be some form of militarised crackdown with an insurgency resisting.

                                          Realistically that detail is by-the-by, the angling is clear for the insurrection act, and some form of armed crackdown on civil liberties will likely follow. Perhaps a war in greenland to keep powerful members of the armed forces busy while this is ongoing, with a view to the trump dynasty fleeing to Qatar in the event things look dire.

                                          tarnport@mastodon.greenT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tarnport@mastodon.greenT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tarnport@mastodon.green
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #80

                                          @BigTittyBimbo @ChrisMayLA6 @AnarchoNinaWrites we've always said, even 20 years ago, that the next civil war in the USA probably will not look like televized dramas of the first Civil War, gray uniforms against blue ones, but more like one-off guerilla assassinations in Walmart parking lots. I wish we'd been wrong.

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum