Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law.

Territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
39 Beiträge 20 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

    @HennaVirkkunen

    Problem is that if respect for International Law shrinks to the EU and a few outliers - it isn't very international.

    szbalint@x0r.beS This user is from outside of this forum
    szbalint@x0r.beS This user is from outside of this forum
    szbalint@x0r.be
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #15

    @stuart @HennaVirkkunen

    Democratic countries (not counting the US here) consist of around half of the worlds GDP

    Yes losing the US in this sense is a big loss, but they aren’t the majority of the world.

    stuart@social.brainsys.comS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG gimulnautti@mastodon.green

      @HennaVirkkunen Fundamental question:

      Since EU upholds legislation that protects US companies, for the favour of not having #tariffs, why are we still holding on to those protections when we have tariffs slapped on our faces anyway? 🤔

      I refer you to @pluralistic who foresaw this and what we should do, at his lecture in 39c3 in Hamburg, just a month ago.

      https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-a-post-american-enshittification-resistant-internet

      me@edafe.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      me@edafe.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      me@edafe.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #16

      @gimulnautti @HennaVirkkunen @pluralistic @RichardJMurphy

      According to Richard Murphy, threats to Greenland present an opportunity for strategic reassessment while US dependencies create leverage that Europe needs to acknowledge and use.

      https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/01/18/can-europe-rise-to-the-us-challenge/

      #tariffs #nato #europe #eu #greenland #denmark #germany #france #uk #italy #poland #sovereignty

      energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • joschi64@hessen.socialJ joschi64@hessen.social

        @stuart @HennaVirkkunen yes, that really is a problem, but what is the alternative? Throwing our democratic values overboard and do the same?
        They would win and we would lose all we’ve reached so far.

        Not a good alternative.

        stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
        stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
        stuart@social.brainsys.com
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #17

        @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

        I was pointing to the fact that international law is irrelevant if you now expect the USA to respect it.

        This is now a case of what we believe in. Is it comfort for us or the right of self-determination for others?

        That's a hard and expensive question to answer. I hope we stand by that and elements within GOP recognise it too and reign in their President. I don't want to think about the alternative.

        energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • szbalint@x0r.beS szbalint@x0r.be

          @stuart @HennaVirkkunen

          Democratic countries (not counting the US here) consist of around half of the worlds GDP

          Yes losing the US in this sense is a big loss, but they aren’t the majority of the world.

          stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
          stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
          stuart@social.brainsys.com
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #18

          @szbalint @HennaVirkkunen

          Without the US there is no NATO. Kill switches on US supplied weapons means we have little defence. European countries are totally exposed.

          Closedown by US owned clouds would make government systems dysfunctional. Mass unemployment as a result of tariffs empowers the fascist right.

          Major or terminal?

          energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
          • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

            @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

            I was pointing to the fact that international law is irrelevant if you now expect the USA to respect it.

            This is now a case of what we believe in. Is it comfort for us or the right of self-determination for others?

            That's a hard and expensive question to answer. I hope we stand by that and elements within GOP recognise it too and reign in their President. I don't want to think about the alternative.

            energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
            energisch_@troet.cafe
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von energisch_@troet.cafe
            #19
            Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
            rrb@infosec.exchangeR 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

              @szbalint @HennaVirkkunen

              Without the US there is no NATO. Kill switches on US supplied weapons means we have little defence. European countries are totally exposed.

              Closedown by US owned clouds would make government systems dysfunctional. Mass unemployment as a result of tariffs empowers the fascist right.

              Major or terminal?

              energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
              energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
              energisch_@troet.cafe
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #20
              Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • richlv@mastodon.socialR richlv@mastodon.social

                @HennaVirkkunen The double space in "between the Kingdom of Denmark" would be great to fix.

                This could also serve as a test whether anybody reads the replies to this account 😉

                energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                energisch_@troet.cafe
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #21
                Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
                richlv@mastodon.socialR 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • sonjdol@ohai.socialS sonjdol@ohai.social

                  @HennaVirkkunen Yes, but I guess this means war.

                  energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                  energisch_@troet.cafe
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #22
                  Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • me@edafe.socialM me@edafe.social

                    @gimulnautti @HennaVirkkunen @pluralistic @RichardJMurphy

                    According to Richard Murphy, threats to Greenland present an opportunity for strategic reassessment while US dependencies create leverage that Europe needs to acknowledge and use.

                    https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/01/18/can-europe-rise-to-the-us-challenge/

                    #tariffs #nato #europe #eu #greenland #denmark #germany #france #uk #italy #poland #sovereignty

                    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    energisch_@troet.cafe
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #23
                    Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

                      Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!

                      richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richlv@mastodon.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #24

                      @energisch_ Sorry, not sure whether that was quite on topic - what exactly did you intend to reply to and.or suggest?

                      energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • richlv@mastodon.socialR richlv@mastodon.social

                        @energisch_ Sorry, not sure whether that was quite on topic - what exactly did you intend to reply to and.or suggest?

                        energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        energisch_@troet.cafe
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #25
                        Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.euH hennavirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                          Territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law. They are essential for Europe and for the international community as a whole.

                          Joint statement by President von der Leyen and President Costa on Greenland: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_143

                          nehemie@fairpoints.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nehemie@fairpoints.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nehemie@fairpoints.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #26

                          @HennaVirkkunen Welcome on the fediverse! I hope you convince more of your colleague to make the move and leave X (or only repost there). Democracy needs sovereignty.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • joschi64@hessen.socialJ joschi64@hessen.social

                            @stuart @HennaVirkkunen yes, that really is a problem, but what is the alternative? Throwing our democratic values overboard and do the same?
                            They would win and we would lose all we’ve reached so far.

                            Not a good alternative.

                            mojala@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mojala@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mojala@mastodon.online
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #27

                            @joschi64 @stuart @HennaVirkkunen What democratic values? Those that drown children in the Mediterranean? Or the ones mandating Chat Control so no private digital communications in Europe? Those ones?

                            stuart@social.brainsys.comS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mojala@mastodon.onlineM mojala@mastodon.online

                              @joschi64 @stuart @HennaVirkkunen What democratic values? Those that drown children in the Mediterranean? Or the ones mandating Chat Control so no private digital communications in Europe? Those ones?

                              stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                              stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                              stuart@social.brainsys.com
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #28

                              @mojala @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

                              I agree and all of us could add a 100 more democratic failures without breaking sweat.

                              But, imho, Democracy had one redeeming feature. The ability to change government without a civil war - or worse. Also to correct, in time, the worst faults.

                              'Had' because it failed in Germany in 1933 and we have to wait and see if it failed America in 2020. The fault is if you elect fascists you get fascism.

                              Democratic Fascism is an oxymoron.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

                                @HennaVirkkunen

                                Problem is that if respect for International Law shrinks to the EU and a few outliers - it isn't very international.

                                stoev@social.stoev.devS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stoev@social.stoev.devS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stoev@social.stoev.dev
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #29

                                @stuart @HennaVirkkunen

                                Absolutely.. Everything will work only if all the players play the same game with the same rules.

                                And clearly that is not the case.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

                                  Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!

                                  rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rrb@infosec.exchange
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #30

                                  @energisch_ @stuart @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen Maybe Trump will unify the EU, just like RFK Jr. has made vaccines more popular in the USA than before.

                                  stuart@social.brainsys.comS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • rrb@infosec.exchangeR rrb@infosec.exchange

                                    @energisch_ @stuart @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen Maybe Trump will unify the EU, just like RFK Jr. has made vaccines more popular in the USA than before.

                                    stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stuart@social.brainsys.com
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #31

                                    @rrb @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

                                    Rejoining the EU will be a long and tortuous trail for the UK no matter it's what people want. More iinteresting, easier and faster is to expand the EEA (countries sharing the EU single market but not members). Drop the first E so we could include Canada, Australia and anybody else who thinks this the best way to protect themselves.

                                    The EU would have to concede some control of the SM but it return we get something with clout so we all benefit.

                                    rrb@infosec.exchangeR 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

                                      @rrb @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

                                      Rejoining the EU will be a long and tortuous trail for the UK no matter it's what people want. More iinteresting, easier and faster is to expand the EEA (countries sharing the EU single market but not members). Drop the first E so we could include Canada, Australia and anybody else who thinks this the best way to protect themselves.

                                      The EU would have to concede some control of the SM but it return we get something with clout so we all benefit.

                                      rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rrb@infosec.exchange
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #32

                                      @stuart @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen Frankly, I think the other NATO members should approach China about a defense agreement that includes putting a short leash on Putin.

                                      Non-US NATO members put in about 60% of the funding. China is more reasonable and less aggressive than USA right now.

                                      The new constellation would be more stable, could make a more reliable approach to enforcing international law, and would serve everyone better.

                                      Also, it would teach the USA an important lesson. Note, I am a US citizen. Somebody has to stop the crazy orange baboon.

                                      I think that just starting negotiations with China would wake up the USA

                                      stuart@social.brainsys.comS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • rrb@infosec.exchangeR rrb@infosec.exchange

                                        @stuart @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen Frankly, I think the other NATO members should approach China about a defense agreement that includes putting a short leash on Putin.

                                        Non-US NATO members put in about 60% of the funding. China is more reasonable and less aggressive than USA right now.

                                        The new constellation would be more stable, could make a more reliable approach to enforcing international law, and would serve everyone better.

                                        Also, it would teach the USA an important lesson. Note, I am a US citizen. Somebody has to stop the crazy orange baboon.

                                        I think that just starting negotiations with China would wake up the USA

                                        stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        stuart@social.brainsys.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        stuart@social.brainsys.com
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #33

                                        @rrb @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

                                        I think it worth sitting it out with the USfor another three years. There are still people there who understand the benefits of allies.

                                        Exerting restraint on this administration has to be done subtlety and is mitigating the lunacy as so many TACOs suggest. It's messy but we have to hope that it will pass with this administration.

                                        No guarantees but we know China. It's lethal as a trusted partner as we found in Hong Kong. There would be no going back.

                                        rrb@infosec.exchangeR G 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • stuart@social.brainsys.comS stuart@social.brainsys.com

                                          @rrb @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen

                                          I think it worth sitting it out with the USfor another three years. There are still people there who understand the benefits of allies.

                                          Exerting restraint on this administration has to be done subtlety and is mitigating the lunacy as so many TACOs suggest. It's messy but we have to hope that it will pass with this administration.

                                          No guarantees but we know China. It's lethal as a trusted partner as we found in Hong Kong. There would be no going back.

                                          rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rrb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rrb@infosec.exchange
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #34

                                          @stuart @energisch_ @joschi64 @HennaVirkkunen I wish that I had your level of optimism.

                                          This is not a one off. Remember that the Nazis based their anti-Jewish laws on the laws in the Jim Crow South. I am afraid that the USA has a rotten core.

                                          I am not a Pollyanna with regards to China, but I think the only way to make the USA wake up is for he rest of the World move on and leave us behind wallowing in our own filth.

                                          energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum