Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
uspoltrumpinsurectionact
119 Beiträge 65 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

    From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

    I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

    (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

    #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

    crowsinger@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
    crowsinger@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
    crowsinger@wandering.shop
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #27

    @ChrisMayLA6 I feel that is exactly the case. It is terrifying, and I’d kinda hoped y final years would be a bit more peaceful

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

      @lukeryanps

      I'm interested in the idea of self-correction - from here it looks like the forces with & behind Trump are seeking to ensure such a self-correction is not possible.... are you saying that is a misapprehension?

      crowsinger@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      crowsinger@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
      crowsinger@wandering.shop
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #28

      @ChrisMayLA6 @lukeryanps I think we will be very fortunate if there are elections this year, and too many people are still clinging to that as of things are normal

      morgawr@bookstodon.comM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

        From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

        I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

        (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

        #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

        c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
        c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
        c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #29

        @ChrisMayLA6 From a certain historical perspective, the US Civil War never really ended, it went underground. The attitudes were cultivated and channeled into institutional racism and Jim Crow laws.

        The 20th century "Confederates" (fascists) never forgave the US government for Civil Rights and equality laws. The 21st century Confederates are trying to unmake the human rights advances in order to institute a white Christian theocracy. (Blame John Calvin.)

        All empires eventually fall, as hubris takes its toll.

        mostlytato@mstdn.socialM crumbletiltskin@mastodon.socialC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

          @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He can’t pause elections lawfully. US has held elections during all wars including the Civil War. He can prevent people from voting by scaring them enough to stay home but even this may not be enough to end voting as courts can extend voting to counter certain issues. Trump wants you to worry.

          etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          etchedpixels@mastodon.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #30

          @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He owns the supreme court. He can do what he likes.

          The only barriers to what he can do are what will finally tip politicians over the edge (assuming they don't wait too long and lose that power too), and at what point the country goes up in flames.

          Given even the "opposition" party is basically executing on "but we're a different kind of nazi" that seems pretty grim.

          alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

            @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He can’t pause elections lawfully. US has held elections during all wars including the Civil War. He can prevent people from voting by scaring them enough to stay home but even this may not be enough to end voting as courts can extend voting to counter certain issues. Trump wants you to worry.

            flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            flisty@mstdn.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #31

            @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 not only that but from what I understand don't individual states administer their own elections? So Trump doesn't have power over how they're held. The controls he has are things like USPS (making postal voting harder) and terrorising people from showing up. But he can't directly do anything to stop them happening.

            flisty@mstdn.socialF 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • flisty@mstdn.socialF flisty@mstdn.social

              @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 not only that but from what I understand don't individual states administer their own elections? So Trump doesn't have power over how they're held. The controls he has are things like USPS (making postal voting harder) and terrorising people from showing up. But he can't directly do anything to stop them happening.

              flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              flisty@mstdn.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #32

              @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 Amanda's Mild Takes on YouTube is very clear on this. https://youtube.com/shorts/cIHkd0YutTA
              She points out in another one that even when Hawaii had martial law after Pearl Harbour, elections still happened.

              alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA axomamma@mastodon.onlineA 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

                @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He owns the supreme court. He can do what he likes.

                The only barriers to what he can do are what will finally tip politicians over the edge (assuming they don't wait too long and lose that power too), and at what point the country goes up in flames.

                Given even the "opposition" party is basically executing on "but we're a different kind of nazi" that seems pretty grim.

                alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                alex_p_roe@mastodon.world
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #33

                @etchedpixels @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 Yes, that he exploits his pet #SCOTUS in some way is a possibility - they may be able to find some obscure law or case and twist a decision in Trump’s favor. Trump and his evil cohorts will no doubt be scheming as we discuss this.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • flisty@mstdn.socialF flisty@mstdn.social

                  @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 Amanda's Mild Takes on YouTube is very clear on this. https://youtube.com/shorts/cIHkd0YutTA
                  She points out in another one that even when Hawaii had martial law after Pearl Harbour, elections still happened.

                  alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                  alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                  alex_p_roe@mastodon.world
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #34

                  @Flisty @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 I asked #ChatGPT about this and the basic answer was no, Trump can’t stop the elections without a constitutional amendment which is highly unlikely - I assume - not always wise - that ChatGPT gave accurate info - will look at Amanda’s video to see how her take compares.

                  flisty@mstdn.socialF 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

                    @Flisty @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 I asked #ChatGPT about this and the basic answer was no, Trump can’t stop the elections without a constitutional amendment which is highly unlikely - I assume - not always wise - that ChatGPT gave accurate info - will look at Amanda’s video to see how her take compares.

                    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    flisty@mstdn.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #35

                    @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 if you ask a real search engine it will give you a long list of articles by humans that agree that trump can't cancel elections 😉

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • d_a_n_a@mstdn.socialD d_a_n_a@mstdn.social

                      @guardeddon @ChrisMayLA6 secession attempts would cause outright civil war. Remember that the federal govt. is heavily armed.

                      I believe we'll see interstate agreements to do things that the federal govt. used to do. If things fall apart completely, these associations could become the basis of regional entities.

                      peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                      peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                      peterbrown@mastodon.scot
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #36

                      @d_a_n_a @guardeddon @ChrisMayLA6 A looser union like the European Union could be the way forward

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                        From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                        I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                        (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                        #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                        tokensane@mastodon.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tokensane@mastodon.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tokensane@mastodon.me.uk
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #37

                        @ChrisMayLA6 I read a piece some time ago saying that the second US civil war won't be armies and set-piece battles, it will be more like the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and the Irish independence fight before that: death squads at midnight, car bombs, kneecapping. Things are developing right along that trajectory at the moment. It's going to get worse before it gets better. Sorry.

                        anne_twain@theblower.auA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

                          @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He can’t pause elections lawfully. US has held elections during all wars including the Civil War. He can prevent people from voting by scaring them enough to stay home but even this may not be enough to end voting as courts can extend voting to counter certain issues. Trump wants you to worry.

                          mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mschatelaine@mastodon.scot
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #38

                          @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 "lawfully" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Whether or not it is lawful, who's going to step up to stop him at this point? If there has not so far been a flash point to general civil war (I'd contend that that state exists in Minneapolis) then this might be a major candidate but it would require the General Staff to stand by their oaths and Hegseth has been culling the officers who would be likely to do that. Or else the public would have to.

                          2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • anarchoninawrites@jorts.horseA anarchoninawrites@jorts.horse

                            @ChrisMayLA6 To have a civil war, you'd have to have government bodies willing to fight the Nazis. That is not happening, nor is it realistic.

                            An uprising? Well we might be headed towards that hella fast. But it ain't gonna be a "Civil War" because the lib establishment will surrender before they start shooting.

                            mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mschatelaine@mastodon.scot
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #39

                            @AnarchoNinaWrites @ChrisMayLA6 bollocks. Black Panthers are libs and they're already arming up.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • flisty@mstdn.socialF flisty@mstdn.social

                              @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 Amanda's Mild Takes on YouTube is very clear on this. https://youtube.com/shorts/cIHkd0YutTA
                              She points out in another one that even when Hawaii had martial law after Pearl Harbour, elections still happened.

                              axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                              axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                              axomamma@mastodon.online
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #40

                              @Flisty @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 I worry less that elections will be cancelled than that Republicans will create enough chaos in enough states and Mike Johnson will use that as an excuse to refuse swearing in the new Democratic House members and keep the GOP in control.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM mschatelaine@mastodon.scot

                                @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 "lawfully" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Whether or not it is lawful, who's going to step up to stop him at this point? If there has not so far been a flash point to general civil war (I'd contend that that state exists in Minneapolis) then this might be a major candidate but it would require the General Staff to stand by their oaths and Hegseth has been culling the officers who would be likely to do that. Or else the public would have to.

                                2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                2legged@mastodon.ie
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #41

                                @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                                Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                                These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                                chrismayla6@zirk.usC nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS mostlytato@mstdn.socialM 4 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                  @ChrisMayLA6 From a certain historical perspective, the US Civil War never really ended, it went underground. The attitudes were cultivated and channeled into institutional racism and Jim Crow laws.

                                  The 20th century "Confederates" (fascists) never forgave the US government for Civil Rights and equality laws. The 21st century Confederates are trying to unmake the human rights advances in order to institute a white Christian theocracy. (Blame John Calvin.)

                                  All empires eventually fall, as hubris takes its toll.

                                  mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mostlytato@mstdn.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #42

                                  @c_merriweather @ChrisMayLA6
                                  It never goes away, it gets beaten, goes under ground, licks its wounds and waits for society to forget. Unfortunately, human nature is what it is.
                                  There are, and always will persist, the dark things in our nature. You don't beat them for good, there is no 'never again.' There is only eternal vigilance, and the price for complacency is tyranny.
                                  For the failings of our complacent society, regardless of the guilty few, we face that now.

                                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                    I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                                    Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                                    These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                                    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chrismayla6@zirk.us
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #43

                                    @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog

                                    Sadly I agree; a reliance in the rule of law in the US in the moment is more about hope than experience

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                      I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                                      Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                                      These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #44

                                      @2legged
                                      Before he took office in 2025, various people commented that Congress could act as a stop on his shitnanigans, to them I responded that out corrupt SCOTUS had given him the authority to override Congress... And he has done so.

                                      People commented that the courts would block him, to which I responded that the courts have no enforcement tools unless he gives it to them... And he has not done so, further he simply ignores them.

                                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                      2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                        @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                        I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                                        Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                                        These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.uk
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #45

                                        @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6
                                        Sadly, any law or constitution is only applicable as far as the people with the power to ignore them choose to pretend they apply.

                                        H 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • mostlytato@mstdn.socialM mostlytato@mstdn.social

                                          @c_merriweather @ChrisMayLA6
                                          It never goes away, it gets beaten, goes under ground, licks its wounds and waits for society to forget. Unfortunately, human nature is what it is.
                                          There are, and always will persist, the dark things in our nature. You don't beat them for good, there is no 'never again.' There is only eternal vigilance, and the price for complacency is tyranny.
                                          For the failings of our complacent society, regardless of the guilty few, we face that now.

                                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #46

                                          @MostlyTato
                                          A building is only as strong as its foundation. The fact is, that the US was built on a cracked and cobbled-together foundation of religious fanaticism, enslavement and genocide. No amount of goodwill, good deeds, or ignoring it can fix that foundation. It was faulty from the beginning, and the flaws will be the cause of its demise.

                                          @ChrisMayLA6

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum