Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
uspoltrumpinsurectionact
119 Beiträge 65 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

    @Flisty @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 I asked #ChatGPT about this and the basic answer was no, Trump can’t stop the elections without a constitutional amendment which is highly unlikely - I assume - not always wise - that ChatGPT gave accurate info - will look at Amanda’s video to see how her take compares.

    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    flisty@mstdn.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #35

    @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 if you ask a real search engine it will give you a long list of articles by humans that agree that trump can't cancel elections 😉

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • d_a_n_a@mstdn.socialD d_a_n_a@mstdn.social

      @guardeddon @ChrisMayLA6 secession attempts would cause outright civil war. Remember that the federal govt. is heavily armed.

      I believe we'll see interstate agreements to do things that the federal govt. used to do. If things fall apart completely, these associations could become the basis of regional entities.

      peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
      peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
      peterbrown@mastodon.scot
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #36

      @d_a_n_a @guardeddon @ChrisMayLA6 A looser union like the European Union could be the way forward

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

        From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

        I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

        (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

        #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

        tokensane@mastodon.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
        tokensane@mastodon.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
        tokensane@mastodon.me.uk
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #37

        @ChrisMayLA6 I read a piece some time ago saying that the second US civil war won't be armies and set-piece battles, it will be more like the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and the Irish independence fight before that: death squads at midnight, car bombs, kneecapping. Things are developing right along that trajectory at the moment. It's going to get worse before it gets better. Sorry.

        anne_twain@theblower.auA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • alex_p_roe@mastodon.worldA alex_p_roe@mastodon.world

          @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 He can’t pause elections lawfully. US has held elections during all wars including the Civil War. He can prevent people from voting by scaring them enough to stay home but even this may not be enough to end voting as courts can extend voting to counter certain issues. Trump wants you to worry.

          mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
          mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
          mschatelaine@mastodon.scot
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #38

          @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 "lawfully" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Whether or not it is lawful, who's going to step up to stop him at this point? If there has not so far been a flash point to general civil war (I'd contend that that state exists in Minneapolis) then this might be a major candidate but it would require the General Staff to stand by their oaths and Hegseth has been culling the officers who would be likely to do that. Or else the public would have to.

          2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • anarchoninawrites@jorts.horseA anarchoninawrites@jorts.horse

            @ChrisMayLA6 To have a civil war, you'd have to have government bodies willing to fight the Nazis. That is not happening, nor is it realistic.

            An uprising? Well we might be headed towards that hella fast. But it ain't gonna be a "Civil War" because the lib establishment will surrender before they start shooting.

            mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
            mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
            mschatelaine@mastodon.scot
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #39

            @AnarchoNinaWrites @ChrisMayLA6 bollocks. Black Panthers are libs and they're already arming up.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • flisty@mstdn.socialF flisty@mstdn.social

              @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 Amanda's Mild Takes on YouTube is very clear on this. https://youtube.com/shorts/cIHkd0YutTA
              She points out in another one that even when Hawaii had martial law after Pearl Harbour, elections still happened.

              axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              axomamma@mastodon.online
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #40

              @Flisty @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 I worry less that elections will be cancelled than that Republicans will create enough chaos in enough states and Mike Johnson will use that as an excuse to refuse swearing in the new Democratic House members and keep the GOP in control.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • mschatelaine@mastodon.scotM mschatelaine@mastodon.scot

                @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6 "lawfully" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Whether or not it is lawful, who's going to step up to stop him at this point? If there has not so far been a flash point to general civil war (I'd contend that that state exists in Minneapolis) then this might be a major candidate but it would require the General Staff to stand by their oaths and Hegseth has been culling the officers who would be likely to do that. Or else the public would have to.

                2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                2legged@mastodon.ie
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #41

                @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                chrismayla6@zirk.usC nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS mostlytato@mstdn.socialM 4 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                0
                • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                  @ChrisMayLA6 From a certain historical perspective, the US Civil War never really ended, it went underground. The attitudes were cultivated and channeled into institutional racism and Jim Crow laws.

                  The 20th century "Confederates" (fascists) never forgave the US government for Civil Rights and equality laws. The 21st century Confederates are trying to unmake the human rights advances in order to institute a white Christian theocracy. (Blame John Calvin.)

                  All empires eventually fall, as hubris takes its toll.

                  mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mostlytato@mstdn.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #42

                  @c_merriweather @ChrisMayLA6
                  It never goes away, it gets beaten, goes under ground, licks its wounds and waits for society to forget. Unfortunately, human nature is what it is.
                  There are, and always will persist, the dark things in our nature. You don't beat them for good, there is no 'never again.' There is only eternal vigilance, and the price for complacency is tyranny.
                  For the failings of our complacent society, regardless of the guilty few, we face that now.

                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                    I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                    Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                    These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chrismayla6@zirk.us
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #43

                    @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog

                    Sadly I agree; a reliance in the rule of law in the US in the moment is more about hope than experience

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                      I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                      Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                      These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #44

                      @2legged
                      Before he took office in 2025, various people commented that Congress could act as a stop on his shitnanigans, to them I responded that out corrupt SCOTUS had given him the authority to override Congress... And he has done so.

                      People commented that the courts would block him, to which I responded that the courts have no enforcement tools unless he gives it to them... And he has not done so, further he simply ignores them.

                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                      2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                        @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                        I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                        Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                        These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stevenheywood@mastodonapp.uk
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #45

                        @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6
                        Sadly, any law or constitution is only applicable as far as the people with the power to ignore them choose to pretend they apply.

                        H 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mostlytato@mstdn.socialM mostlytato@mstdn.social

                          @c_merriweather @ChrisMayLA6
                          It never goes away, it gets beaten, goes under ground, licks its wounds and waits for society to forget. Unfortunately, human nature is what it is.
                          There are, and always will persist, the dark things in our nature. You don't beat them for good, there is no 'never again.' There is only eternal vigilance, and the price for complacency is tyranny.
                          For the failings of our complacent society, regardless of the guilty few, we face that now.

                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                          c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #46

                          @MostlyTato
                          A building is only as strong as its foundation. The fact is, that the US was built on a cracked and cobbled-together foundation of religious fanaticism, enslavement and genocide. No amount of goodwill, good deeds, or ignoring it can fix that foundation. It was faulty from the beginning, and the flaws will be the cause of its demise.

                          @ChrisMayLA6

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org

                            @2legged
                            Before he took office in 2025, various people commented that Congress could act as a stop on his shitnanigans, to them I responded that out corrupt SCOTUS had given him the authority to override Congress... And he has done so.

                            People commented that the courts would block him, to which I responded that the courts have no enforcement tools unless he gives it to them... And he has not done so, further he simply ignores them.

                            @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                            2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2legged@mastodon.ie
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #47

                            @nikatjef It's not just the corrupt SCOTUS. The MAGA-controlled Congress has rarely even tried to stop Trump.

                            The separation of powers doctrine never envisaged one sociopath capturing all threw branches of government.

                            @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                            nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                              @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                              I see in this thread a lot of touching belief in variants of the phrase "Trump can’t do XYZ lawfully".

                              Sadly, the last 12 months is the story of Trump doing whatever he wants, regardless of law or constitution. Tariffs, removing trans rights, invasion, genocide, murder at sea, demolishing the East Wing, snatch squads, torture: all "can't legally do" but all being done.

                              These legal theories no longer describe actual power in #USA.

                              mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mostlytato@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mostlytato@mstdn.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #48

                              @2legged @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6
                              In this new world there is only one law and that's the law of the jungle. As long as a bully is permitted to reign, then his power is absolute.
                              Law is consensual or it is worthless.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                @nikatjef It's not just the corrupt SCOTUS. The MAGA-controlled Congress has rarely even tried to stop Trump.

                                The separation of powers doctrine never envisaged one sociopath capturing all threw branches of government.

                                @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #49

                                @2legged
                                While correct, you are missing the point. SCOTUS has given him authority to override Congress, specifically in regards to the power of the purse and Congress themselves gave up the power of war under Bush... As such they have no mechanism to stop him, even if they wanted to, which I believe they will want after the midterms.

                                If we even have midterms that is...

                                @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                  @ChrisMayLA6 From a certain historical perspective, the US Civil War never really ended, it went underground. The attitudes were cultivated and channeled into institutional racism and Jim Crow laws.

                                  The 20th century "Confederates" (fascists) never forgave the US government for Civil Rights and equality laws. The 21st century Confederates are trying to unmake the human rights advances in order to institute a white Christian theocracy. (Blame John Calvin.)

                                  All empires eventually fall, as hubris takes its toll.

                                  crumbletiltskin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crumbletiltskin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  crumbletiltskin@mastodon.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #50

                                  @c_merriweather @ChrisMayLA6 the mistake is when it does fall, we fail to completely eradicate the problem and we run around in circles and wonder why history seems to repeat

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org

                                    @2legged
                                    While correct, you are missing the point. SCOTUS has given him authority to override Congress, specifically in regards to the power of the purse and Congress themselves gave up the power of war under Bush... As such they have no mechanism to stop him, even if they wanted to, which I believe they will want after the midterms.

                                    If we even have midterms that is...

                                    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    2legged@mastodon.ie
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #51

                                    @nikatjef With respect, I think that you are missing my point that both SCOTUS and Congress are failing to restrain Trump.

                                    Despite the corrupt #SCOTUS, Congress is not neutered. Congress still retains huge power to tighten law, and ultimately to impeach. Trump's authoritarianism could be stopped by either Congress or SCOTUS.

                                    @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                    nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • 2legged@mastodon.ie2 2legged@mastodon.ie

                                      @nikatjef With respect, I think that you are missing my point that both SCOTUS and Congress are failing to restrain Trump.

                                      Despite the corrupt #SCOTUS, Congress is not neutered. Congress still retains huge power to tighten law, and ultimately to impeach. Trump's authoritarianism could be stopped by either Congress or SCOTUS.

                                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #52

                                      @2legged
                                      No, I get that and agree, but they (Congress and Judicial) no longer have any tools to stop him, even if they wanted to.

                                      Impeachment only works if he and his cabinet respect the impeachment, which SCOTUS has ruled he doesn't have to do.

                                      Judicial branch can only enforce their rulings if he and his cabinet lets the DOJ do enforce them.

                                      Congress could impeach him tomorrow, he would rant and rail, but otherwise ignore it

                                      @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                      2legged@mastodon.ie2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                                        From this side of the Atlantic (the UK side) it looks like the US is slipping towards civil war, goaded on by a President wanting to invoke the Insurrection Act as a way of militarising his political power.

                                        I'd be interested if followers of these posts in the US think the same or whether the media's distorting mirror is deceiving us about the gravity of the situation...

                                        (Civil) analysis & contextual answers boosted & thanks in advance for sharing.

                                        #USPol #Trump #InsurectionAct

                                        lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lackthereof@beige.party
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #53

                                        @ChrisMayLA6

                                        Yes and no.

                                        The regime has threatened large scale violence and military rule many times before, but this is a regime that talks big. Militarization of civilian federal law enforcement services will escalate, but I do not see armed conflict between federal and state power in our near future.

                                        For it to happen, the US state governments will have to, at some point, put their money where their mouth is with regards to resistance. For now they've been content to wage a war of words and court papers.

                                        When the regime's puppet Republican supreme court finally issues a ruling that enables full federal military rule over the country, only then will we know if our opposition/state level leaders have the stones to defy it with force.

                                        Otherwise it's just waiting for them to try and overturn another election.

                                        lackthereof@beige.partyL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN nikatjef@mastodon.acm.org

                                          @2legged
                                          No, I get that and agree, but they (Congress and Judicial) no longer have any tools to stop him, even if they wanted to.

                                          Impeachment only works if he and his cabinet respect the impeachment, which SCOTUS has ruled he doesn't have to do.

                                          Judicial branch can only enforce their rulings if he and his cabinet lets the DOJ do enforce them.

                                          Congress could impeach him tomorrow, he would rant and rail, but otherwise ignore it

                                          @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                          2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                          2legged@mastodon.ie2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                          2legged@mastodon.ie
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #54

                                          @nikatjef What have I missed? Which SCOTUS ruling(s) have removed or restricted the power of Congress to impeach and remove from office?

                                          @Mschatelaine @alex_p_roe @EvelineSulman @Mattrog @ChrisMayLA6

                                          nikatjef@mastodon.acm.orgN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum