@mattblaze sorry if it seemed like I was trying to contradict you. I agree with everything you said, and your nuclear option brought to mind a subtler possibility
novelgazer@infosec.exchange
@novelgazer@infosec.exchange
Beiträge
-
No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting. -
No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.@mattblaze but I do still worry that he has effective power to disrupt the election, nonetheless, and his constant "jokes" about it suggest it's not unlikely he'll try
-
No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.@mattblaze I do!
-
No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.@mattblaze it's congruent with his recent actions, none of which have been effectively contested; it's high deniability and high impact
-
No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.@mattblaze I feel like this could be done with a very minimal footprint by deploying ICE in pivotal neighborhoods in swing states to suppress the vote through intimidation and delay, targeted using voter rolls (where he's gained access to them) and personal information extracted by DOGE from various federal agencies