@AwetTesfaiesus
Eine sehr gute Zusammenfassung zu Punkt zwei (öffentliche Wahrnehmung) gibt es im letzten State of CDR Bericht. Das gesamte Report ist übrigens empfehlenswert und absolut unverzichtbar in unserem wissenschaftlichen Disziplin.

Ich wäre außerdem höchst interessiert, wie Kapitel 6 aussehen würde, wenn #fediverse statt #muskyboi im Fokus gewesen wäre....

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/633458017a1ae214f3772c76/t/665ed1e2b9d34b2bf8e17c63/1717490167773/The-State-of-Carbon-Dioxide-Removal-2Edition.pdf

@sunnythesheep @AwetTesfaiesus
you're right, CCS is a related but different topic. But CDR is definitely "geoengineering" when it is implemented at a climate-relevant scale.

The reason I brought up CCS is because the (new) German law, specifically related to undersea storage, suggests a political desire to relax our comparably stringent interpretation of the London convention and protocol.

As CDR remains illegal in Germany -because of our LP/LC interpretation- the CCS decision could open the way for geoengineering in the form of CDR here.

@AwetTesfaiesus @ekorn
#Geoengineering mag überwiegend tech bros sein, aber (mindestens in meiner kleinen CDR-Welt) sind keineswegs alle so

@AwetTesfaiesus
The opinions might be even more interesting if #Geoengineering was split into to it's two main categories, solar engineering and #CDR (carbon dioxide removal)...with the latter especially pertinent with our recent #CCS decision