Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
55 Beiträge 25 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

    @fruitcakesareyum @groxx keeping chat history with intermittent connectivity or machines not always powered up

    groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
    groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
    groxx@hachyderm.io
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #35

    @whitequark @fruitcakesareyum the bane of mobile devices in particular.

    basically you completely lose chat history while offline, because there is no chat history in IRC*, servers are practically just a fancy ephemeral signal-repeater*. so a bouncer would stay always-connected for you, keeping that history, and would replay* it when you reconnected.

    last time I used irc moderately, I did it via irccloud, which acts as a bouncer for you. ircv3 might mean I no longer need that, but otherwise I liked it a lot (a couple years ago), definitely recommend.

    *: drastically over-simplifying to the point that it's no longer accurate, but I believe it fits the user experience / need well enough

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • snoopj@hachyderm.ioS snoopj@hachyderm.io

      @whitequark @futuresprog it doesn't really help matters the IRCv3 working group has just kinda given up on versioning the whole thing and now there's "the modern IRC protocol" at the core and the cloud of extensions

      so there's no versioned document you can point at and say IRCv3.x as there was with IRCv3.1 and IRCv3.2, and I'm not sure the smaller granular extension specifications have any versioning either. it all manages to hold together nonetheless, I guess because they don't make breaking changes (because all in the extensions, the core got it very right pretty early, especially if an implementation has the combination of capabilities AND tags)

      classabbyamp@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      classabbyamp@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      classabbyamp@chaos.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #36

      @SnoopJ @whitequark @futuresprog yeah the whole point of v3 is the capability negotiation mechanism, with everything else being optional and up to the client to choose, so you can't really version it

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • snoopj@hachyderm.ioS snoopj@hachyderm.io

        @whitequark @futuresprog they've had "IRCv3 support" since inception AFAIK (I believe even freenode had it)

        what they're rolling out is support for some extensions to IRCv3, in particular the `message-tags` specification which will support things like `+draft/reply` by adding a new capability to add a bunch of metadata to a message (which involves bumping the line length up 8191 bytes, allowing for just under 4K of tag data)

        IRCv3's capability negotiation is such a powerful way to let the ecosystem continue to grow in a way that allows more granular specifications

        futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nzF This user is from outside of this forum
        futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nzF This user is from outside of this forum
        futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nz
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #37

        That’s a more clever way to upgrade a federated system without a huge cutover

        @SnoopJ @whitequark

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

          IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

          here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

          • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
          • there are moblie clients that work well
          • you can see backlog when joining a channel
          • you can browse chat history
          • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
          • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
          • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
          • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
          • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
          • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
          • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
          • there are message reactions, if you want them

          here's the things it does not offer:

          • image, video, or file uploads
          • stickers
          • complex onboarding tools

          caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

          unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

          gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gimulnautti@mastodon.green
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #38

          @whitequark I’ve found myself thinking of going back to IRC, and this gives me more reasons than I has hoped for!

          Ps. I think everybody is finally using Utf-8.. please? 😜

          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

            IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

            here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

            • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
            • there are moblie clients that work well
            • you can see backlog when joining a channel
            • you can browse chat history
            • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
            • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
            • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
            • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
            • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
            • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
            • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
            • there are message reactions, if you want them

            here's the things it does not offer:

            • image, video, or file uploads
            • stickers
            • complex onboarding tools

            caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

            unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

            calmeilles@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            calmeilles@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            calmeilles@mstdn.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #39

            @whitequark

            Feels like this should have been news from around 2000.

            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • calmeilles@mstdn.socialC calmeilles@mstdn.social

              @whitequark

              Feels like this should have been news from around 2000.

              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #40

              @calmeilles I'll take it in 2026

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG gimulnautti@mastodon.green

                @whitequark I’ve found myself thinking of going back to IRC, and this gives me more reasons than I has hoped for!

                Ps. I think everybody is finally using Utf-8.. please? 😜

                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #41

                @gimulnautti yes, UTF8ONLY is a feature now

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                  IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

                  here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

                  • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
                  • there are moblie clients that work well
                  • you can see backlog when joining a channel
                  • you can browse chat history
                  • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
                  • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
                  • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
                  • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
                  • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
                  • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
                  • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
                  • there are message reactions, if you want them

                  here's the things it does not offer:

                  • image, video, or file uploads
                  • stickers
                  • complex onboarding tools

                  caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

                  unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  anonax@defcon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #42

                  @whitequark
                  File uploads could probably be kludged exclusively on the client side with something like
                  ```
                  START FILE UPLOAD
                  METADATA <metadata>
                  BODY <base64 file contents>
                  END FILE UPLOAD
                  ```
                  although it would be problematic in that it would show up as spam for anyone without the client extension, and would be less efficient than a binary solution. It could work the same with image, audio, video, and stickers, since those are all just specially tagged files. Could even work for streaming (hence live audio/video calls) if the files are chunked right, maybe adding CONTINUE BELOW and CONTINUED FROM ABOVE indicators.

                  Of course, that would be stupid, since a 2MB file would take more characters than make up the entire LotR trilogy (~2.3M) under this encoding scheme, all of which would be shown in their raw form to any user with an incompatible client (unless IRC lets users handle this somehow). Maybe there's a reason people leave some things to the server.

                  I realize I have just given an oversimplified description of how XMPP handles (or maybe handled, depending on implemented XEPs) file uploads.

                  (please don't interpret this as me trying to fedisplain how you should implement a file upload protocol. don't implement it this way, please.)

                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • A anonax@defcon.social

                    @whitequark
                    File uploads could probably be kludged exclusively on the client side with something like
                    ```
                    START FILE UPLOAD
                    METADATA <metadata>
                    BODY <base64 file contents>
                    END FILE UPLOAD
                    ```
                    although it would be problematic in that it would show up as spam for anyone without the client extension, and would be less efficient than a binary solution. It could work the same with image, audio, video, and stickers, since those are all just specially tagged files. Could even work for streaming (hence live audio/video calls) if the files are chunked right, maybe adding CONTINUE BELOW and CONTINUED FROM ABOVE indicators.

                    Of course, that would be stupid, since a 2MB file would take more characters than make up the entire LotR trilogy (~2.3M) under this encoding scheme, all of which would be shown in their raw form to any user with an incompatible client (unless IRC lets users handle this somehow). Maybe there's a reason people leave some things to the server.

                    I realize I have just given an oversimplified description of how XMPP handles (or maybe handled, depending on implemented XEPs) file uploads.

                    (please don't interpret this as me trying to fedisplain how you should implement a file upload protocol. don't implement it this way, please.)

                    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                    whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #43

                    @anonax I have XMPP file transfer trauma. for reals.

                    I still remember what bz2|base64 starts with because it was more reliable to do that to send small files.

                    (it's Qlp...)

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                      IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

                      here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

                      • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
                      • there are moblie clients that work well
                      • you can see backlog when joining a channel
                      • you can browse chat history
                      • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
                      • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
                      • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
                      • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
                      • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
                      • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
                      • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
                      • there are message reactions, if you want them

                      here's the things it does not offer:

                      • image, video, or file uploads
                      • stickers
                      • complex onboarding tools

                      caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

                      unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

                      nawanp@fe.disroot.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nawanp@fe.disroot.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nawanp@fe.disroot.org
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #44

                      Yeah. IRCv3 is good, unless you dont care about one of basic features of all modern instant messaging: presence.

                      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                        IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

                        here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

                        • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
                        • there are moblie clients that work well
                        • you can see backlog when joining a channel
                        • you can browse chat history
                        • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
                        • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
                        • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
                        • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
                        • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
                        • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
                        • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
                        • there are message reactions, if you want them

                        here's the things it does not offer:

                        • image, video, or file uploads
                        • stickers
                        • complex onboarding tools

                        caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

                        unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

                        nyx@social.xenofem.meN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nyx@social.xenofem.meN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nyx@social.xenofem.me
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #45
                        @whitequark year of the IRC desktop
                        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • nawanp@fe.disroot.orgN nawanp@fe.disroot.org

                          Yeah. IRCv3 is good, unless you dont care about one of basic features of all modern instant messaging: presence.

                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #46

                          @nawanp matrix has no presence, discord technically has it but ime it has no correlation whatsoever to whether i'll get a response so... yeah? i don't care about presence

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • nyx@social.xenofem.meN nyx@social.xenofem.me
                            @whitequark year of the IRC desktop
                            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                            whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #47

                            @nyx no joking yeah

                            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                              @nyx no joking yeah

                              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #48

                              @nyx "year of IRC on phones" is probably the true correspondent though hah

                              nyx@social.xenofem.meN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                                @nyx "year of IRC on phones" is probably the true correspondent though hah

                                nyx@social.xenofem.meN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nyx@social.xenofem.meN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nyx@social.xenofem.me
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #49
                                @whitequark I was gonna say that aside from file uploads I think the main thing holding back IRC from being generally recommendable rn is the lack of good mobile clients lol
                                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW kimapr@ublog.kimapr.netK 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • nyx@social.xenofem.meN nyx@social.xenofem.me
                                  @whitequark I was gonna say that aside from file uploads I think the main thing holding back IRC from being generally recommendable rn is the lack of good mobile clients lol
                                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #50

                                  @nyx goguma is very barebones but like. It does let you chat just fine

                                  I totally agree with the uploads, I should either start or join a draft spec for this

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • nyx@social.xenofem.meN nyx@social.xenofem.me
                                    @whitequark I was gonna say that aside from file uploads I think the main thing holding back IRC from being generally recommendable rn is the lack of good mobile clients lol
                                    kimapr@ublog.kimapr.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kimapr@ublog.kimapr.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kimapr@ublog.kimapr.net
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #51

                                    @nyx@social.xenofem.me @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems is there actually a good mobile IRC client now? last i checked the landscape was quite bad. there was like one mobile client i kind of liked that supports modern features but it only supports connecting to one server at a time (which makes it completely unusable)

                                    ATM i'm just using IRC over Biboumi (XMPP-IRC bridge) and Conversations (XMPP client).

                                    fiore@rentseeking.questF whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                                      IRCv3 is shaping to be amazingly good!

                                      here's the things it offers, today, right now, on a chat server we just set up in one evening:

                                      • you don't need a bouncer (friggin finally)
                                      • there are moblie clients that work well
                                      • you can see backlog when joining a channel
                                      • you can browse chat history
                                      • you can connect from multiple devices with one account and nickname
                                      • if you disconnect, your nickname is still present in a channel you joined, marked as away
                                      • you can highlight or DM people who are away and they'll see your message when they join (without crutches like MemoServ)
                                      • there is a "last read message" marker and it is synchronized between multiple connections
                                      • messages have identifiers (and server timestamps) and replies can be tagged with the message you're replying to
                                      • you don't need to deal with fussy nonsense like NickServ authorization, ghosting, or such; connect with your username and password and that's it
                                      • there are typing notifiers, if you want them
                                      • there are message reactions, if you want them

                                      here's the things it does not offer:

                                      • image, video, or file uploads
                                      • stickers
                                      • complex onboarding tools

                                      caveat: since IRCv3 is a true extension of IRCv2, the features listed above work if they're supported by both the server and the client. in my onboarding experience so far, people do not find it difficult to find a suitable client, but your mileage may vary. on the flipside, legacy clients will work just fine.

                                      unexpectly, i realized that IRCv3 can completely replace Matrix rooms for my own group chat purposes, and i'm probably not going to set up any Matrix homeservers again; it's just not worth it and frankly I should instead put that effort into coming up with a file upload IRCv3 extension or something

                                      fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      fiore@rentseeking.quest
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #52
                                      imean on boarding tools can probably be handled as server bots , right ?
                                      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • kimapr@ublog.kimapr.netK kimapr@ublog.kimapr.net

                                        @nyx@social.xenofem.me @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems is there actually a good mobile IRC client now? last i checked the landscape was quite bad. there was like one mobile client i kind of liked that supports modern features but it only supports connecting to one server at a time (which makes it completely unusable)

                                        ATM i'm just using IRC over Biboumi (XMPP-IRC bridge) and Conversations (XMPP client).

                                        fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fiore@rentseeking.questF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fiore@rentseeking.quest
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #53
                                        goguma is good if you have a bouncer like soju

                                        CC: @whitequark@treehouse.systems @nyx@social.xenofem.me
                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • kimapr@ublog.kimapr.netK kimapr@ublog.kimapr.net

                                          @nyx@social.xenofem.me @whitequark@social.treehouse.systems is there actually a good mobile IRC client now? last i checked the landscape was quite bad. there was like one mobile client i kind of liked that supports modern features but it only supports connecting to one server at a time (which makes it completely unusable)

                                          ATM i'm just using IRC over Biboumi (XMPP-IRC bridge) and Conversations (XMPP client).

                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #54

                                          @kimapr @nyx goguma still has that bug open yeah. lolsob

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum