Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
59 Beiträge 49 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

    sauc3@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
    sauc3@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
    sauc3@hachyderm.io
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #20

    @sundogplanets

    Why can't we have the future where we are led by scientists and not the stupidest assholes?

    crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

      albertojavier@universeodon.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      albertojavier@universeodon.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      albertojavier@universeodon.com
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #21

      @sundogplanets let's take a moment to remember those idiots who spent years talking straight sh!t about the so-called chemtrails. Chemtrails don't exist, idiots do..

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange

        @sundogplanets

        "AI winter"... truly scary...

        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        n_dimension@infosec.exchange
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #22

        @paul_ipv6 @sundogplanets

        AiWinter is the secret solution to the "Cooking to death" climate collapse.

        See? Broligarchs were right when they said AI fill fix #climatecollapse

        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN n_dimension@infosec.exchange

          @paul_ipv6 @sundogplanets

          AiWinter is the secret solution to the "Cooking to death" climate collapse.

          See? Broligarchs were right when they said AI fill fix #climatecollapse

          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #23

          @n_dimension @sundogplanets

          sadly, "fix" in the veterinary sense of the word...

          edelruth@mastodon.onlineE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.space
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #24

            @sundogplanets Guess it's a good thing it's a near-impossibility to get that many into the atmosphere though it's not like I want half of that number either, even a tenth feels like a lot.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

              malcircuit@thingy.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              malcircuit@thingy.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              malcircuit@thingy.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #25

              @sundogplanets seems fine

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                markhurst@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                markhurst@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                markhurst@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #26

                @sundogplanets I have a bunch of shows in the Techtonic pipeline right now but at *some* point if/when you're available, I'd love to talk with you on the show about this risk

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                  ericfielding@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  ericfielding@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  ericfielding@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #27

                  @sundogplanets Nuclear war, but without plutonium so a little different.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                    olivia_55@mastodon.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #28

                    @sundogplanets then what?

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                      trabern@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trabern@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trabern@mas.to
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #29

                      @sundogplanets Hard to imagine we survived the 1970s-1980s mutually assured destruction era just to end up back in the same stupidity.

                      paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                        funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        funkylab@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #30

                        @sundogplanets considering the mass of material transported to atmosphere by under- and above-ground nuclear tests, that seems to be off by a couple of orders of magnitude.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                          paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                          paco@infosec.exchange
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #31

                          @sundogplanets nearly 10 years ago “we have had enough of experts” today, it has completely come true. The experts are almost totally sidelined.

                          https://www.london.edu/think/who-needs-experts

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • trabern@mas.toT trabern@mas.to

                            @sundogplanets Hard to imagine we survived the 1970s-1980s mutually assured destruction era just to end up back in the same stupidity.

                            paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #32

                            @trabern @sundogplanets

                            i remember all the civil rights stuff from the 60s/70s and we're right back there again too. constant vigilance is needed to not regress.

                            i love science, since the assumption in science is that you always need to know where you've been, what's worked and not worked, and hopefully you don't revisit dead ends.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                              bzdev@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bzdev@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bzdev@fosstodon.org
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #33

                              @sundogplanets If they want to put a server farm in orbit, how about at the L4 or L5 Lagrange points for the Earth-Moon system? They'd be in direct sunlight most of the time, reducing the need for batteries. Less impact on telescopes as well.

                              For Elon's LLM, let's put it at L3 (Earth/Sun system), which would have some real benefits for the rest of us: with the sun in the way, it would be hard to "talk" to it.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                                lyonsinbeta@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lyonsinbeta@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lyonsinbeta@mastodon.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #34

                                @sundogplanets

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                                  apostateenglishman@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  apostateenglishman@mastodon.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  apostateenglishman@mastodon.world
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #35

                                  @sundogplanets Is it possible that behind closed doors, Musk et al think Kessler syndrome will reverse climate change? Is that the level of myopic stupidity we could be dealing with here?

                                  I mean, the Epstein class do seem to sincerely believe that technology will somehow save *them*, even if billions of the rest of us are wiped out in the process. 🤷🏻‍♂️

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    crouton@aus.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #36

                                    @sundogplanets the scary part imho is all the people who are in a position to accept the implied valuation of these "AI datacentres" and effectively create funny money out of thin air.
                                    I think Elon would put those datacentres up there IF he could, despite consequences. I also think he knows he can't, but need to keep the party going and so... this.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      slotos@toot.community
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #37

                                      @sundogplanets They might be overestimating the effects of a nuclear war.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • derickr@phpc.socialD derickr@phpc.social

                                        @sundogplanets @paul_ipv6 I really don't believe this stupid plan is ever going to happen.

                                        Even if they can launch 1000 sats a week, it'll take 20 years (if none fall down). And that's not even taking into consideration the resources needed to build them.

                                        It's more Elon bluster, and just a way for him to get money out of gullible investors. Think Theranos.

                                        There is (unfortunately) plenty of credible schemes to fight.

                                        smutmag@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        smutmag@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        smutmag@mstdn.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #38

                                        @derickr @sundogplanets @paul_ipv6 That he is plotting it at all means he needs to be stopped. Halted. It's at least worth talking to reps about. What of Elon fails but he inspires a smarter, more efficient psycho that goes for it. If this is something they are threatening then it's something we should be trying to prevent.

                                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • derickr@phpc.socialD derickr@phpc.social

                                          @sundogplanets @paul_ipv6 I really don't believe this stupid plan is ever going to happen.

                                          Even if they can launch 1000 sats a week, it'll take 20 years (if none fall down). And that's not even taking into consideration the resources needed to build them.

                                          It's more Elon bluster, and just a way for him to get money out of gullible investors. Think Theranos.

                                          There is (unfortunately) plenty of credible schemes to fight.

                                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          punissuer@universeodon.com
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #39

                                          @derickr @sundogplanets @paul_ipv6 But they will probably still launch hundreds of rockets. They need to, to pass the time until they have come up with next big thing to keep investors amused. Only then can they abandon their current hype carrier…

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum