Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

"How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
41 Beiträge 25 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mikemccaffrey@pdx.socialM mikemccaffrey@pdx.social

    @DenisCOVIDinfoguy @KanaMauna Surprising that tuberculosis could linger longest in the air, considering it is a bacteria, and about a thousand times larger and heavier than a virus.

    kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
    kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
    kanamauna@sauropods.win
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #6

    @mikemccaffrey @DenisCOVIDinfoguy

    From what I've read, it is a fairly tough microbe that can survive dry environments for surprisingly long periods. The other ones on the list are probably inactive before they hit the ground.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

      "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

      RSV: up to 45 mins
      Influenza: at least 1 hour
      Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
      Measles: up to 2 hours
      Norovirus: up to 2 hours
      COVID-19: up to 3 hours
      Chickenpox: several hours
      Mumps: several hours
      Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

      Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

      drangnon@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      drangnon@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      drangnon@hachyderm.io
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #7

      @DenisCOVIDinfoguy instead of just accepting these numbers, get air purifiers for spaces you control, and push the owners of space you don't control to do it too

      robloblaw@mastodon.socialR 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

        "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

        RSV: up to 45 mins
        Influenza: at least 1 hour
        Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
        Measles: up to 2 hours
        Norovirus: up to 2 hours
        COVID-19: up to 3 hours
        Chickenpox: several hours
        Mumps: several hours
        Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

        Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

        fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fedithing@social.chinwag.org
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #8

        @DenisCOVIDinfoguy

        Best weapon against this is masking plus keeping windows open, preferably windows on different sides of the room so that there's a draught flowing through. If you only have one window you can use an electric fan next to it to create a draught.

        The room's air exchanges several times more quickly if you have a good draught of some kind. I can't find it now, but Japanese researchers did an excellent video illustrating this with smoke machines and lasers.

        If you get a good quality CO2 meter you can actually watch the air get fresher as the numbers drop.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

          "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

          RSV: up to 45 mins
          Influenza: at least 1 hour
          Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
          Measles: up to 2 hours
          Norovirus: up to 2 hours
          COVID-19: up to 3 hours
          Chickenpox: several hours
          Mumps: several hours
          Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

          Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

          su_g@aus.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          su_g@aus.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          su_g@aus.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #9

          @DenisCOVIDinfoguy
          A handy reference - thank you! That tuberculosis is a real outlier - I’m reading about some resurgence in the US, not good. ☹️

          nilajones@zeroes.caN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mikemccaffrey@pdx.socialM mikemccaffrey@pdx.social

            @DenisCOVIDinfoguy @KanaMauna Surprising that tuberculosis could linger longest in the air, considering it is a bacteria, and about a thousand times larger and heavier than a virus.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            cy@pdx.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #10

            @mikemccaffrey @DenisCOVIDinfoguy @KanaMauna Seems sketchy to me. Is this one of those "only in a carefully controlled lab environment in total darkness" things?

            I know the COVID scare had the researchers protesting (and being ignored) that it breaks down quickly in sunlight.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

              "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

              RSV: up to 45 mins
              Influenza: at least 1 hour
              Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
              Measles: up to 2 hours
              Norovirus: up to 2 hours
              COVID-19: up to 3 hours
              Chickenpox: several hours
              Mumps: several hours
              Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

              Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

              datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
              datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
              datum@zeroes.ca
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #11

              @DenisCOVIDinfoguy Ok but the paper they link does NOT say "up to 3 hours" for COVID-19, it says aerosolized COVID-19 is still highly infectious after 3 hours, when they stopped testing

              SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air New England Journal of Medicine

              in other words after 3 hours, every single liter of air contained HUNDREDS of particles that could infect.

              And in the years since the 2020 study they cite, others have looked at longer time scales, and papers have found that in indoor air > 500 ppm CO2, enough infectious particles effectively persist indefinitely that cleaning the air is the only physically plausible approach: Nature

              #COVID19 #COVID #SARSCoV2 #COVIDisAirborne #PublicHealth #pandemic #CovidIsNotOver

              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.caS 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • datum@zeroes.caD datum@zeroes.ca

                @DenisCOVIDinfoguy Ok but the paper they link does NOT say "up to 3 hours" for COVID-19, it says aerosolized COVID-19 is still highly infectious after 3 hours, when they stopped testing

                SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air New England Journal of Medicine

                in other words after 3 hours, every single liter of air contained HUNDREDS of particles that could infect.

                And in the years since the 2020 study they cite, others have looked at longer time scales, and papers have found that in indoor air > 500 ppm CO2, enough infectious particles effectively persist indefinitely that cleaning the air is the only physically plausible approach: Nature

                #COVID19 #COVID #SARSCoV2 #COVIDisAirborne #PublicHealth #pandemic #CovidIsNotOver

                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #12

                @datum

                Agree. Three hours would be short. It's going to be a statistical distribution as the virus particles over time are rendered non-viable, with long tail. They probably last a lot longer in the air than we'd care to admit to ourselves. Coronas in experimental rotating drums lasted 48 hours or something. That said, the particles dilute over time, and we need to breathe enough that one particle does end up infecting.

                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ lkdc@dmv.communityL datum@zeroes.caD 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                0
                • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                  @datum

                  Agree. Three hours would be short. It's going to be a statistical distribution as the virus particles over time are rendered non-viable, with long tail. They probably last a lot longer in the air than we'd care to admit to ourselves. Coronas in experimental rotating drums lasted 48 hours or something. That said, the particles dilute over time, and we need to breathe enough that one particle does end up infecting.

                  jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #13

                  @datum I'd only trust any of those studies if done by knowledgeable people (they never are) and with a suitable sample size (they're usually done by ID people and they're embarrassingly bad). Hope the studies that produced these numbers were decent.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                    @datum

                    Agree. Three hours would be short. It's going to be a statistical distribution as the virus particles over time are rendered non-viable, with long tail. They probably last a lot longer in the air than we'd care to admit to ourselves. Coronas in experimental rotating drums lasted 48 hours or something. That said, the particles dilute over time, and we need to breathe enough that one particle does end up infecting.

                    lkdc@dmv.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lkdc@dmv.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lkdc@dmv.community
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #14

                    @jmcrookston @datum I'm trying to understand what all this means, in practical terms, for covid-cautious people who live with people who take no covid precautions. A common concern is removing one's respirator to take a shower in a bathroom that has recently been used by someone who might be infected with SARS-CoV-2. I've been under the impression that there's value in waiting even a short time (15-60 minutes), as the risk will go down, albeit not to zero. Is that incorrect?

                    datum@zeroes.caD cwicseolfor@zeroes.caC 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                      @datum

                      Agree. Three hours would be short. It's going to be a statistical distribution as the virus particles over time are rendered non-viable, with long tail. They probably last a lot longer in the air than we'd care to admit to ourselves. Coronas in experimental rotating drums lasted 48 hours or something. That said, the particles dilute over time, and we need to breathe enough that one particle does end up infecting.

                      datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                      datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                      datum@zeroes.ca
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #15

                      @jmcrookston Yep. The newer article I linked splits infectivity into phases, and in the final phase volume has decreased to the point that mucin effectively stops evaporation, and SARS-CoV-2 degrades very slowly if there's no UV.

                      "The particles dilute over time" so long as there's any ACH. I had a discussion here where someone pointed out their shared stairwell has effectively no ventilation, at which point it's deposition rate. Slow!

                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • lkdc@dmv.communityL lkdc@dmv.community

                        @jmcrookston @datum I'm trying to understand what all this means, in practical terms, for covid-cautious people who live with people who take no covid precautions. A common concern is removing one's respirator to take a shower in a bathroom that has recently been used by someone who might be infected with SARS-CoV-2. I've been under the impression that there's value in waiting even a short time (15-60 minutes), as the risk will go down, albeit not to zero. Is that incorrect?

                        datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                        datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                        datum@zeroes.ca
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #16

                        @Lkdc so I suggest figure 6 from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47777-5

                        Yes, waiting a short time would reduce airborne load.

                        It would also help to open a window - both for ACH and because lower CO2 speeds viable virus degradation.

                        The long tail hard to avoid. If the bathroom is ventilated to 3 ACH it's not "the air is completely gone 3x an hour" but "thrice the volume of air in the room is exchanged per hour" and so forth.

                        If it's a scenario you face, you could consider augmenting whatever ventilation the common bathroom has with UV disinfection, since it's likely much easier to plug in an emitter than to upgrade ventilation.

                        I believe there's a correlation between inoculum dose and negative outcomes.

                        So yes I would understand waiting until the first two phases are expected to pass if possible (their durations can be estimated from that paper and checking humidity (RH) and CO2), and then ACH or UV sterilization to bring down the long tail until it's within your risk budget.

                        lkdc@dmv.communityL nilajones@zeroes.caN texan_reverend@kind.socialT 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • lkdc@dmv.communityL lkdc@dmv.community

                          @jmcrookston @datum I'm trying to understand what all this means, in practical terms, for covid-cautious people who live with people who take no covid precautions. A common concern is removing one's respirator to take a shower in a bathroom that has recently been used by someone who might be infected with SARS-CoV-2. I've been under the impression that there's value in waiting even a short time (15-60 minutes), as the risk will go down, albeit not to zero. Is that incorrect?

                          datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          datum@zeroes.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          datum@zeroes.ca
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #17

                          @Lkdc Also a thought experiment:

                          there is a point at which a person, infected with SARS2, hasn't yet exhaled an infectious particle.

                          And so there is a point at which they're still are producing very few per exhalation.

                          Then at the other extreme are superspreaders, putting thousands of infectious particles into the air per exhalation.

                          While some degrees of defense (waiting 15-60 minutes) are unlikely to be reliable against the latter, they could well bring the former down to astronomical odds of transmission.

                          So maybe the most honest answer is "whether waiting 15-60 minutes is enough to prevent infection varies, but it will only ever help."

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • datum@zeroes.caD datum@zeroes.ca

                            @Lkdc so I suggest figure 6 from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47777-5

                            Yes, waiting a short time would reduce airborne load.

                            It would also help to open a window - both for ACH and because lower CO2 speeds viable virus degradation.

                            The long tail hard to avoid. If the bathroom is ventilated to 3 ACH it's not "the air is completely gone 3x an hour" but "thrice the volume of air in the room is exchanged per hour" and so forth.

                            If it's a scenario you face, you could consider augmenting whatever ventilation the common bathroom has with UV disinfection, since it's likely much easier to plug in an emitter than to upgrade ventilation.

                            I believe there's a correlation between inoculum dose and negative outcomes.

                            So yes I would understand waiting until the first two phases are expected to pass if possible (their durations can be estimated from that paper and checking humidity (RH) and CO2), and then ACH or UV sterilization to bring down the long tail until it's within your risk budget.

                            lkdc@dmv.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lkdc@dmv.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lkdc@dmv.community
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #18

                            @datum Thank you very much for the detailed assessment.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                            • datum@zeroes.caD datum@zeroes.ca

                              @jmcrookston Yep. The newer article I linked splits infectivity into phases, and in the final phase volume has decreased to the point that mucin effectively stops evaporation, and SARS-CoV-2 degrades very slowly if there's no UV.

                              "The particles dilute over time" so long as there's any ACH. I had a discussion here where someone pointed out their shared stairwell has effectively no ventilation, at which point it's deposition rate. Slow!

                              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #19

                              @datum yes if ventilation I meant. Which can be slow or fast of course. If nothing then yes it's agglutination (I understand the particles tend toward certain sizes) and deposition on walls and ceiling and floor. Like cigarette smoke. Should hang out for a long while.

                              If people want to know how long they can just burn some toast on a pan. Then they can tell us how long that smoke hangs out

                              If they really want to be bright, they could run their air purifier and see how quickly it clears the air

                              datum@zeroes.caD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • datum@zeroes.caD datum@zeroes.ca

                                @DenisCOVIDinfoguy Ok but the paper they link does NOT say "up to 3 hours" for COVID-19, it says aerosolized COVID-19 is still highly infectious after 3 hours, when they stopped testing

                                SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosols throughout the duration of our experiment (3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from 103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air New England Journal of Medicine

                                in other words after 3 hours, every single liter of air contained HUNDREDS of particles that could infect.

                                And in the years since the 2020 study they cite, others have looked at longer time scales, and papers have found that in indoor air > 500 ppm CO2, enough infectious particles effectively persist indefinitely that cleaning the air is the only physically plausible approach: Nature

                                #COVID19 #COVID #SARSCoV2 #COVIDisAirborne #PublicHealth #pandemic #CovidIsNotOver

                                scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.ca
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #20

                                @datum I would like to hear some information about how contagious this virus is outdoors playing sports with people.

                                I've had to give up five years of pickelball becasue of this virus. 😞

                                nilajones@zeroes.caN datum@zeroes.caD 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • datum@zeroes.caD datum@zeroes.ca

                                  @Lkdc so I suggest figure 6 from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47777-5

                                  Yes, waiting a short time would reduce airborne load.

                                  It would also help to open a window - both for ACH and because lower CO2 speeds viable virus degradation.

                                  The long tail hard to avoid. If the bathroom is ventilated to 3 ACH it's not "the air is completely gone 3x an hour" but "thrice the volume of air in the room is exchanged per hour" and so forth.

                                  If it's a scenario you face, you could consider augmenting whatever ventilation the common bathroom has with UV disinfection, since it's likely much easier to plug in an emitter than to upgrade ventilation.

                                  I believe there's a correlation between inoculum dose and negative outcomes.

                                  So yes I would understand waiting until the first two phases are expected to pass if possible (their durations can be estimated from that paper and checking humidity (RH) and CO2), and then ACH or UV sterilization to bring down the long tail until it's within your risk budget.

                                  nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nilajones@zeroes.ca
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #21

                                  @datum @Lkdc

                                  As an easy approximation, I would say run the ceiling fan if you have one, or put a fan in the window, and run it until the air doesn't seem steamy to you anymore, the mirror is not steamed up, etc.

                                  Then you can figure the air has been changed

                                  This will probably take 30-45 minutes

                                  Also, I keep my mask on when taking a bath. So that's an option, if you have a tub

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

                                    "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

                                    RSV: up to 45 mins
                                    Influenza: at least 1 hour
                                    Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
                                    Measles: up to 2 hours
                                    Norovirus: up to 2 hours
                                    COVID-19: up to 3 hours
                                    Chickenpox: several hours
                                    Mumps: several hours
                                    Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

                                    Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

                                    dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dianea@lgbtqia.space
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #22

                                    @DenisCOVIDinfoguy

                                    From my own no-covid experience since this started, wearing a kn-95 mask as fit tested at all times is good enough. If someone sneezes or coughs in the room, absolutely keep that mask on.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.caS scienceisnotopinions@mstdn.ca

                                      @datum I would like to hear some information about how contagious this virus is outdoors playing sports with people.

                                      I've had to give up five years of pickelball becasue of this virus. 😞

                                      nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nilajones@zeroes.ca
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #23

                                      @Scienceisnotopinions @datum

                                      The only two times I've caught symptomatic covid, I was outdoors, socially distanced, and wearing an n95. But the other person wasn't

                                      So I wouldn't play pickleball with unmasked people

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • su_g@aus.socialS su_g@aus.social

                                        @DenisCOVIDinfoguy
                                        A handy reference - thank you! That tuberculosis is a real outlier - I’m reading about some resurgence in the US, not good. ☹️

                                        nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nilajones@zeroes.caN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nilajones@zeroes.ca
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #24

                                        @Su_G @DenisCOVIDinfoguy

                                        Problem is, it's not an outlier. People are posting links to papers, in the thread. Covid is never gone, until fresh air has replaced all the air in the room. Certainly not gone in 3 hours

                                        This also makes me question all the other numbers

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • deniscovidinfoguy@aus.socialD deniscovidinfoguy@aus.social

                                          "How long diseases like measles and the flu linger in the air — after an infected person has left the room"

                                          RSV: up to 45 mins
                                          Influenza: at least 1 hour
                                          Rhinovirus: 1-2 hours
                                          Measles: up to 2 hours
                                          Norovirus: up to 2 hours
                                          COVID-19: up to 3 hours
                                          Chickenpox: several hours
                                          Mumps: several hours
                                          Tuberculosis (TB): 6-12 hours

                                          Source: https://archive.md/dKnQP

                                          ralphstark@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ralphstark@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ralphstark@nrw.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #25

                                          @DenisCOVIDinfoguy Although I think these times are true, when did it start that the fake news post is cited as credible. The only tell the truth once to tell people lies about ten or hundred other facts.

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum