Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Hot take: good riddance.

Hot take: good riddance.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
185 Beiträge 116 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • volpeon@icy.wyvern.ripV volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip

    @vkc

    if you don't like it don't use it
    You can like something as a whole and dislike aspects of it. And isn't this the case with a lot of things in life? If I stopped using something over disliking just a few parts of it, I wouldn't be able to use anything at all because nothing will ever be a 100% fit.

    vkc@linuxmom.netV This user is from outside of this forum
    vkc@linuxmom.netV This user is from outside of this forum
    vkc@linuxmom.net
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #172

    @volpeon OK so I don't literally mean "quit using GNOME if you dislike one or two things", I mean "rather than bring vitriol into a conversation, consider investing that time and energy in a new tool".

    I often say "if you don't like it, don't use it" as a shorthand because we're blessed for choice here in the Linux ecosystem, unlike other desktop computing platforms.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

      @glent "its role in the failure of desktop Linux"

      That's a GIGANTIC assumption. And is insulting to the hard working people who work on GNOME, many of whom had nothing to do with those so-called "insular design choices".

      It's open source, you can't force a team to do things your way. GNOME's foundation led to wonderful projects like Cinnamon, and I'd argue that the diversification has been a strength.

      IMO it's all needless harping on folks who have different opinions.

      nicholas@aklp.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicholas@aklp.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicholas@aklp.club
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #173

      so-called "insular design choices"

      I mean, didn't they preemptively locked the discussion thread to just developers and insta-closed (and threatened to ban folks creating) other form topics about it trying to get some user feedback on the record?

      I agree with your points that gnome gets to do whatever gnome wants, and maybe folks on the internet could try chilling out once in a while; but that said: "insular" is just a straight-up accurate way to describe gnome's process here if Brodie's reporting on the situation was accurate. 🤷‍♀️

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • shift@bliry.frS shift@bliry.fr

        @vkc@linuxmom.net @volpeon@icy.wyvern.rip definitely. i like GNOME, but i wish they'd allow for slightly more customization out of the box (although i get why they don't)

        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
        wakame@tech.lgbtW This user is from outside of this forum
        wakame@tech.lgbt
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #174

        @shift @vkc @volpeon

        I like GNOME, but it often makes it really hard to be liked.

        And there should definitely be a lot more ways to customize it. Ideally with proper config files.

        "You want to set the brightness? Sorry, you have to download a tool for that."

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

          Anyway, if you like GNOME and their design concepts, you're awesome and totally a valid user of Linux.

          Sick of the absurd nonsense that says otherwise.

          fabiscafe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fabiscafe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fabiscafe@mstdn.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #175

          @vkc I'll leave this also here
          https://mstdn.social/@fabiscafe/115848147812611839

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • diogoconstantino@masto.ptD diogoconstantino@masto.pt

            @vkc I love the middle click, I've been using it for about 26 years, and I think its one of my favourite features. I'll be annoyed if it goes away.

            I'm totally ok with making it optional...

            erindesu@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
            erindesu@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
            erindesu@tech.lgbt
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #176

            @DiogoConstantino @vkc it is optional as much it is now. Just the default changes.

            And ye I totally agree. One of reasons why i cannot use Windows, though surprised there is no third party thingee.

            diogoconstantino@masto.ptD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • erindesu@tech.lgbtE erindesu@tech.lgbt

              @DiogoConstantino @vkc it is optional as much it is now. Just the default changes.

              And ye I totally agree. One of reasons why i cannot use Windows, though surprised there is no third party thingee.

              diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
              diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
              diogoconstantino@masto.pt
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #177

              @erindesu @vkc I'm ok with it as long as it's easy to switch on.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

                In this period, in this timeline, at this moment, maybe, just maybe, we shouldn't talk about *desktop environment design disagreements* like they're causing deep emotional harm?

                ozeng@aus.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ozeng@aus.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ozeng@aus.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #178

                @vkc they are causing deep emotional harm, but we’re not dealing with mature, well-adjusted adults here. We’re dealing with Linux zealots.

                I like the highlight and middle-click paste. It gives me a second, and faster, clipboard.

                I can see how it would be frustrating for new users and those without a suitably firm actuator on their rodent.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

                  Hot take: good riddance. I dislike the middle click thing. Trips me up all the time as someone who accidentally clicks it when scrolling.

                  I think the right move is to make this (undoubtedly useful to some) behavior opt-in, not opt-out.

                  A lot of the gripes I see are just people being mad because GNOME makes choices they don't like. I don't understand why people write like this about GNOME, if you don't like it don't use it, your emotions make you look petty, etc etc.

                  https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/07/gnome_middle_click_paste/

                  chriswood@mastodon.designC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chriswood@mastodon.designC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chriswood@mastodon.design
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #179

                  @vkc I’m glad middle click is getting turned off by default too.

                  My first experience with Linux was installing it on a Mac, connecting my Magic Mouse, then trying to work out why it was randomly pasting my clipboard all over the place instead of clicking normally.

                  I eventually worked out that Linux thought magic mice should have a third, mystery button in the middle which pastes. Not a good first user experience - wasn’t familiar or comfortable behaviour.

                  Hopefully this helps new users.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

                    Hot take: good riddance. I dislike the middle click thing. Trips me up all the time as someone who accidentally clicks it when scrolling.

                    I think the right move is to make this (undoubtedly useful to some) behavior opt-in, not opt-out.

                    A lot of the gripes I see are just people being mad because GNOME makes choices they don't like. I don't understand why people write like this about GNOME, if you don't like it don't use it, your emotions make you look petty, etc etc.

                    https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/07/gnome_middle_click_paste/

                    ndufresne@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                    ndufresne@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                    ndufresne@fosstodon.org
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #180

                    @vkc to turn this comment over, have you ever questioned the mouse design? What is the purpose of the middle button now? It's a waste of a switch ? p.s. I've been using middle paste since I moved to Linux (~1999) it's way faster than alternatives as long as your mouse isn't physical difficult. I chose my mouse carefully for that reason. Now, the feature is not really gone, it's just disabled. There is a thing called gnome tweaks, you could disable it for a while, now you can enable it instead.

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

                      Hot take: good riddance. I dislike the middle click thing. Trips me up all the time as someone who accidentally clicks it when scrolling.

                      I think the right move is to make this (undoubtedly useful to some) behavior opt-in, not opt-out.

                      A lot of the gripes I see are just people being mad because GNOME makes choices they don't like. I don't understand why people write like this about GNOME, if you don't like it don't use it, your emotions make you look petty, etc etc.

                      https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/07/gnome_middle_click_paste/

                      theonedoc@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                      theonedoc@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                      theonedoc@tech.lgbt
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #181

                      @vkc see I don't like almost all choices GNOME made over the decades that's why I don#t use it and that's why I get annoyed when they hold up stuff like wayland protocols just because they don't like it on there upshot smartphone UI but I will not argue over the default of a config option as long is it is easy to change and well documented.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • vkc@linuxmom.netV vkc@linuxmom.net

                        Anyway, if you like GNOME and their design concepts, you're awesome and totally a valid user of Linux.

                        Sick of the absurd nonsense that says otherwise.

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        avincentinspace@furry.engineer
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #182

                        @vkc I don't believe anyone is arguing otherwise, especially not the people who disagree with that decision. It's just that the GNOME maintainers have a habit of not implementing features they have decided that users don't need, ranging from little things like this to maximize and minimize buttons, and I believe it's understandable to not like this mindset and think those things should at least be configurable.

                        "Some people like the GNOME way of doing things and those people are okay" and "One of the main draws of Linux is escaping the one-size-fits-all paradigm that Windows and MacOS are leaning into more and more lately, and the GNOME maintainers' attitude of "if you don't like your desktop how we like ours, don't use GNOME" is disappointing" are not mutually exclusive ideas.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.orgB bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org

                          @vkc Oh…my…gosh. I've never liked GNOME (or KDE). But so 🤬 what? My spouse, who is not a programmer, has enjoyed every version of GNOME since 1999 & a Linux-based system has been her primary desktop for decades.

                          I'm vaguely aware that *yet again*; like some kind of clockwork, the world wants to 💩-post about #GNOME for the 2ⁿ-th time.

                          I gave this #GUADEC keynote 10 years ago directed at these haters; I'm sad it's still relevant,though.

                          https://sfconservancy.org/videos/2016-08-12_Bradley-Kuhn_GUADEC-2016_Keynote.webm

                          Cc: @federicomena @ebassi @karen

                          benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benjamineskola@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benjamineskola@hachyderm.io
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #183

                          @bkuhn @vkc Yeah, I haven’t used Gnome personally in a long time but when I did I remember seeing criticisms of it that seemed completely detached from reality, that in no way reflected the actual experience of using it.

                          20 years later, they’re still making the same criticisms. I admit I don’t know first-had, but I’m willing to bet that the criticisms didn’t magically become valid in the intervening time.

                          It’s always the same people, anyway, who never do anything but moan about systemd and/or wayland. (Wayland, especially, they’ll insist simply does not work at all, despite the evidence of thousands — millions? — of people using it regularly without issues.) These people can’t be taken seriously.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • D draeand@social.the-gdn.net

                            @emi @vkc No, Wayland neeeds to care too, not just DEs. Right now, global keyboard access and other things which assistive technology would require is all over the place and DEs are allowed to do their own thing. Those kinds of features should be a part of the core Wayland specification. Accessibility should never be a third-class citizen. And the accessibility landscape is already fragmented enough. We don't need Wayland adding to it

                            tragivictoria@mastodon.catgirl.cloudT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tragivictoria@mastodon.catgirl.cloudT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tragivictoria@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #184

                            @draeand@the-gdn.net @emi@social.comfy.city @vkc@linuxmom.net accessibility is first-class citizen. But you know what? Its fucking difficult and companies do not bother to fund this effort. The only reason we have any accessibility at all is because Sun funded it for their Solaris.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • passthejoe@ruby.socialP passthejoe@ruby.social

                              @vkc I also hate middle click. It's only useful on a three-button mouse.

                              mina@berlin.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mina@berlin.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mina@berlin.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #185

                              @passthejoe

                              Who would use a one or two button mouse, if you can have a three button one.

                              @vkc

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              Antworten
                              • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                              Anmelden zum Antworten
                              • Älteste zuerst
                              • Neuste zuerst
                              • Meiste Stimmen



                              Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                              Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                              Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                              • Anmelden

                              • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                              • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                              • Erster Beitrag
                                Letzter Beitrag
                              0
                              • Home
                              • Aktuell
                              • Tags
                              • Über dieses Forum