Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike
I was picking and choosing which sites I'd continue with if they had this kind of opt in arrangement.
Now I think I'll just bipass them all. -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike I do this. Not as a pattern I later understood but as a fully conscious and weighted decision. Statistic from mastodon won't give any hint about how many traffic the website looses, though.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike ME!
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike If consentomatic can't deal with it, I use reader mode, and if that can't I close the tab.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Me too since many years.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike same here.
-
@mike @jokeyrhyme there were mentions/news last year, that things (regulation-wise) will be simplified - for end-users that is I'm not sure where/how that ended though.
Btw, I'm aware that's not the solution to malicious compliance, but Consent-o-matic add-on usually does the job well.
@gim @jokeyrhyme Consent-o-matic great so far as it goes, but it only handles a small subset of the sites I follow links to.
-
@mike
Yup, me too.
Also wtf is 'legitimate interest'?@pthane There is no such thing.
(Also: doesn't that mean they're admitting all the others are not legitimate?)
-
@mike
i admit too often im too curious and still do the extra clicks to get to the content and sometimes, which is also way too often, i also click „accept all“the most important fact:
„we care about privacy“ is a lie if it’s coming in a cookie banner.
who really cares about privacy can do real necessary cookies without additional banner.
who does it anyway deserves no click at all - not reject all, not extra preferences settings, and least accept all@lazyb0y Yes, quite!
-
@mike Same, but if I'm really interested and there's no easy way to reject all I open the page in an anonymous window.
@cvtsi2sd Yes, I do that, too. There is something satisfying about clicking Accept All in a new anonymous window, and imagining them thinking "Aha, new data!" little knowing it's all about to evaporate
-
@bitchboss @mike My worry with “Accept Only Necssary” is what counts as necessary to who?
@bjn @bitchboss Fair point. We all know what "necessary" ACTUALLY means, but that doesn't mean they're not maliciously interpreting it differently!
-
@mike Yes! Opebned Facebook and saw a couple of interesting pages. Each one led to that kind of website. Closed the tab, deleted the ad from my feed. #GetRidOfTheJunk
@talexb The next step is to delete Facebook itself
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!Yup.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Oh, I didn't know that you can open pages without the 'deny all cookies' button a second time.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Similar, I just flip to reader mode if there's any popup, I won't interact with it at all. If there's no reader mode I close the tab.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike I do this.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike
I copy the link of the article and look it up via archive.ph ... only for some sites it doesn't work (especially French newspapers...) -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!"We and our 8,647 business partners care about your privacy" -- oh like hell you do!
Yeah, no "reject all", no readie.
Sometimes, if I feel patient enough and I think I want to read whatever is behind the wizard of oz curtain, I'll run the url through a paywall scrubber; but, even then, I often have to wait in a queue for that to be processed.
Then it suuuucks when I do that and wait all that time and then the article is simply clickbait trash with a bunch of Twitter links. Ugh.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike ah thanks for reminding me to re-install consent-o-matic
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike same
