Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Me too since many years.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike same here.
-
@mike @jokeyrhyme there were mentions/news last year, that things (regulation-wise) will be simplified - for end-users that is I'm not sure where/how that ended though.
Btw, I'm aware that's not the solution to malicious compliance, but Consent-o-matic add-on usually does the job well.
@gim @jokeyrhyme Consent-o-matic great so far as it goes, but it only handles a small subset of the sites I follow links to.
-
@mike
Yup, me too.
Also wtf is 'legitimate interest'?@pthane There is no such thing.
(Also: doesn't that mean they're admitting all the others are not legitimate?)
-
@mike
i admit too often im too curious and still do the extra clicks to get to the content and sometimes, which is also way too often, i also click „accept all“the most important fact:
„we care about privacy“ is a lie if it’s coming in a cookie banner.
who really cares about privacy can do real necessary cookies without additional banner.
who does it anyway deserves no click at all - not reject all, not extra preferences settings, and least accept all@lazyb0y Yes, quite!
-
@mike Same, but if I'm really interested and there's no easy way to reject all I open the page in an anonymous window.
@cvtsi2sd Yes, I do that, too. There is something satisfying about clicking Accept All in a new anonymous window, and imagining them thinking "Aha, new data!" little knowing it's all about to evaporate
-
@bitchboss @mike My worry with “Accept Only Necssary” is what counts as necessary to who?
@bjn @bitchboss Fair point. We all know what "necessary" ACTUALLY means, but that doesn't mean they're not maliciously interpreting it differently!
-
@mike Yes! Opebned Facebook and saw a couple of interesting pages. Each one led to that kind of website. Closed the tab, deleted the ad from my feed. #GetRidOfTheJunk
@talexb The next step is to delete Facebook itself
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!Yup.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Oh, I didn't know that you can open pages without the 'deny all cookies' button a second time.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Similar, I just flip to reader mode if there's any popup, I won't interact with it at all. If there's no reader mode I close the tab.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike I do this.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike
I copy the link of the article and look it up via archive.ph ... only for some sites it doesn't work (especially French newspapers...) -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!"We and our 8,647 business partners care about your privacy" -- oh like hell you do!
Yeah, no "reject all", no readie.
Sometimes, if I feel patient enough and I think I want to read whatever is behind the wizard of oz curtain, I'll run the url through a paywall scrubber; but, even then, I often have to wait in a queue for that to be processed.
Then it suuuucks when I do that and wait all that time and then the article is simply clickbait trash with a bunch of Twitter links. Ugh.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike ah thanks for reminding me to re-install consent-o-matic
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike same
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Yep, I do the same.
-
@bjn @bitchboss Fair point. We all know what "necessary" ACTUALLY means, but that doesn't mean they're not maliciously interpreting it differently!
And who says that everything is “legally” adjusted when you disable all options except for the one option “Accept only necessary”? I want to click through to the desired page as quickly as possible, not play ping pong by turning 25 options on or off. The cookie cleaner does the rest when a third-party cookie comes along, which means that for me, there is virtually no reason to be paranoid, and when I close the browser, the cookies and tracker pixies in the cache are completely gone.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Likewise, likewise.
Getting increasingly allergic to cookies, and just turning away if/when I don't like the presented options. Which happens quite a lot now.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike Yeah, I do this all the time.
