Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
bluesky
149 Beiträge 91 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

    An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

    Blocking on Bluesky is NOT PRIVATE: it's very easy to see who is blocking any account by visiting sites that list that information.

    I took a screenshot from https://clearsky.app, listing all the accounts that are blocking ICE (I pixelated avatars and usernames for privacy purposes).

    The safest bet is to mute (that info is private) 😫

    miki@dragonscave.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    miki@dragonscave.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    miki@dragonscave.space
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #139

    @_elena This is also true about Mastodon*, but Mastodon actively tries to hide that fact from users and muddy the waters.

    * It's technically hidden to users but not the admins of the instances involved, but if you're a gov agency, you're presumably on your own instance, as seems to be the custom here for the "big players."

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • saupreiss@pfalz.socialS saupreiss@pfalz.social

      @divVerent

      Right away. That instance needs it so that that user cannot see the toots or can reply to it, so of course there is little that could be done differently.

      @_elena

      divverent@misskey.deD This user is from outside of this forum
      divverent@misskey.deD This user is from outside of this forum
      divverent@misskey.de
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #140
      @Saupreiss@pfalz.social @_elena@mastodon.social Hiding the toots from the blocked person is super dumb though. After all, they can simply see them in logged-out state, e.g. from an incognito window. Subway Tooter even has an explicit feature to do that (shows the account as ?@instance then).

      The other actions - do they really need to be prevented on the local instance of the blocked person? If so, that's broken too - after all, the blocked person could simply run an instance with that code removed. From what I understand, this can only work well if the actions need to be approved (or blocked) by the blocking person.

      Well, I guess that makes the entire feature pretty dumb... well, all the more reason to not use it and to just mute instead.
      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

        An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

        Blocking on Bluesky is NOT PRIVATE: it's very easy to see who is blocking any account by visiting sites that list that information.

        I took a screenshot from https://clearsky.app, listing all the accounts that are blocking ICE (I pixelated avatars and usernames for privacy purposes).

        The safest bet is to mute (that info is private) 😫

        pomubieng@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pomubieng@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        pomubieng@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #141

        @_elena flee that nazi bar is a better option.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

          @NatureMC @u_urban @_elena I suspect most of Mastodon would end up blocking the entire instance with ICE on it, but I can't say for sure. And I think that would be something the servers themselves would do, not individual accounts. Perhaps some would be afraid to go that far, but I think the majority would do it.

          You are right that the Fediverse is anything but perfect of course. There's only so much human moderators can do in particular. The chief difference is it's ours not some company's

          sb@metroholografix.caS This user is from outside of this forum
          sb@metroholografix.caS This user is from outside of this forum
          sb@metroholografix.ca
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #142

          @nazokiyoubinbou @NatureMC @u_urban @_elena

          "... most of Mastodon would end up blocking the entire instance with ICE on it..."

          I knew I'd end up blocking .social eventually.

          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • sb@metroholografix.caS sb@metroholografix.ca

            @nazokiyoubinbou @NatureMC @u_urban @_elena

            "... most of Mastodon would end up blocking the entire instance with ICE on it..."

            I knew I'd end up blocking .social eventually.

            naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
            naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
            naturemc@mastodon.online
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #143

            @sb .. would block a lot of wonderful people, too. @nazokiyoubinbou @u_urban @_elena

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

              An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

              Blocking on Bluesky is NOT PRIVATE: it's very easy to see who is blocking any account by visiting sites that list that information.

              I took a screenshot from https://clearsky.app, listing all the accounts that are blocking ICE (I pixelated avatars and usernames for privacy purposes).

              The safest bet is to mute (that info is private) 😫

              tomjennings@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomjennings@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #144

              @_elena

              I'm curious, why does it matter if blocking bluesky is public or not?

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

                Blocking on Bluesky is NOT PRIVATE: it's very easy to see who is blocking any account by visiting sites that list that information.

                I took a screenshot from https://clearsky.app, listing all the accounts that are blocking ICE (I pixelated avatars and usernames for privacy purposes).

                The safest bet is to mute (that info is private) 😫

                chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                chris@social.losno.coC This user is from outside of this forum
                chris@social.losno.co
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #145

                @_elena Bit too late for me, I'm already subscribed to the "all US official accounts" block list.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • fds@mastodon.socialF fds@mastodon.social

                  @bastardsheep It’s always felt like a path to bullying people. Either by giving grief to people for who is in their block list or creating awfully named lists and putting people in it. In the past I’ve seen list names that feel like it’s named in such a way they hope the people in the list see it.

                  xinit@mastodon.coffeeX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xinit@mastodon.coffeeX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xinit@mastodon.coffee
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #146

                  @fds public information on who people block feels like a way to build a Bullying As A Service (BaaS) solution.

                  Bots that find people that block someone, and then direct minions to attack. This week, people who block a billionaire TERF, next week people that block the ICE account.

                  With some OSINT thrown in, could maybe identify the people offline and target them there.

                  wizards@bastardsheep@aus.social

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                    @smattymatty indeed 🥲

                    maximilianblum@linke.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    maximilianblum@linke.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    maximilianblum@linke.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #147

                    @_elena @smattymatty hm, I think that's a vulnerable argument. If fedi would spread more, there would appear more instances that would not block ICE.

                    smattymatty@socialontario.caS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • maximilianblum@linke.socialM maximilianblum@linke.social

                      @_elena @smattymatty hm, I think that's a vulnerable argument. If fedi would spread more, there would appear more instances that would not block ICE.

                      smattymatty@socialontario.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                      smattymatty@socialontario.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                      smattymatty@socialontario.ca
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #148

                      @MaximilianBlum @_elena

                      Fedi has the tools to deal with this, BlueSky doesn't.

                      Toxic instances already exist, and I agree that if fedi grows, more toxic instances will exist - it will become more difficult to update blocklists and whatnot - but at least Fedi gives us the tools to deal with this.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                        An important PSA for people who are active on #Bluesky and who, upon hearing that the ICE account was officially verified, are saying: "I will just block it."

                        Blocking on Bluesky is NOT PRIVATE: it's very easy to see who is blocking any account by visiting sites that list that information.

                        I took a screenshot from https://clearsky.app, listing all the accounts that are blocking ICE (I pixelated avatars and usernames for privacy purposes).

                        The safest bet is to mute (that info is private) 😫

                        maximilianblum@linke.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maximilianblum@linke.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maximilianblum@linke.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #149

                        @_elena ...and another recent reason: #cashtags on #bluesky https://www.heise.de/en/news/Not-the-community-s-wishes-Bluesky-brings-live-stream-display-and-Cashtags-11143599.html

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • idlehirn@loma.mlI idlehirn@loma.ml shared this topic
                        Antworten
                        • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                        Anmelden zum Antworten
                        • Älteste zuerst
                        • Neuste zuerst
                        • Meiste Stimmen



                        Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                        Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                        Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                        • Anmelden

                        • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                        • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                        • Erster Beitrag
                          Letzter Beitrag
                        0
                        • Home
                        • Aktuell
                        • Tags
                        • Über dieses Forum