While we do #Denmark #Danmark #USA #Greenland #Arctic drama, don't forget the #Inuit, the people who live there
-
@eswag @grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn Also, it is genuinely hard and a bit dangerous to alter the Constitution. It has to pass with 2/3 of each chamber of Congress, and ratified by 3/4 of state legislatures.
@su_liam @grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
For sure, amending a constitution isn't something you do lightly. I think it should be possible to get an amendment like "corporations are not people, and money is not speech" through without breaking too many eggs.
As for hard, it used to be done with the same thresholds.
-
@eswag @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn Can people who work really hard with two or three side hustles and not spending money on avocado toast and $1000 iPhones become billionaires?
Probably - it's rare, but it can happen. Mostly, this line of rhetoric is made by the assholes at the top to reframe the problem of inequality and lack of social mobility from structural injustice onto personal responsibility. You're not a billionaire because just you're not hustling hard enough.
This is a post about people voting in primaries.
@grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
The correct answer to that question is "fuck no!". Name a billionaire former hard working hustler. I bet you can't find even one.
Unless you can find an integer percentage of the US population of them (i.e. a few million), any you do find are a rounding error, and the answer is still "fuck no!".
-
@su_liam @grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
For sure, amending a constitution isn't something you do lightly. I think it should be possible to get an amendment like "corporations are not people, and money is not speech" through without breaking too many eggs.
As for hard, it used to be done with the same thresholds.
@eswag @su_liam @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn My brother, it took the most deadly war in US history to amend our Constitution so that humans from Africa were considered *mostly *human. That was 160 years ago not only have we not made it the rest of the way, but we're falling backwards.
We're unable to amend our Constitution so that we consider women to have the same rights as men.
Getting rich people and their financial instruments (corporations) to not run our government and our lives will be just as hard and likely just as bloody.
-
@eswag @su_liam @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn My brother, it took the most deadly war in US history to amend our Constitution so that humans from Africa were considered *mostly *human. That was 160 years ago not only have we not made it the rest of the way, but we're falling backwards.
We're unable to amend our Constitution so that we consider women to have the same rights as men.
Getting rich people and their financial instruments (corporations) to not run our government and our lives will be just as hard and likely just as bloody.
@grumble209 @su_liam @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
The last one was done without a war in 1992. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
I agree that disenfranchising the oligarchy isn't going to be easy, but constitutional amendments have been done within the lifetimes of many (most?) living US citizens. Also, they've been done without violent havoc.
-
yup
the americans didn't tell the danes, they just set up a secret nuclear installation in #greenland, then abandoned it, and as the ice melts it's a pollution timebomb
-
@eswag @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn Can people who work really hard with two or three side hustles and not spending money on avocado toast and $1000 iPhones become billionaires?
Probably - it's rare, but it can happen. Mostly, this line of rhetoric is made by the assholes at the top to reframe the problem of inequality and lack of social mobility from structural injustice onto personal responsibility. You're not a billionaire because just you're not hustling hard enough.
This is a post about people voting in primaries.
@grumble209 @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn
It's a nonsense post, if you think it's about primaries.
The flaws of democracy are never fixed by less engagement in democratic processes.
Sure, we can argue people are time short - and what can we do to address that. But concluding that you abandon the democratic process instead is wildly illogical.
-
@grumble209 @su_liam @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
The last one was done without a war in 1992. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
I agree that disenfranchising the oligarchy isn't going to be easy, but constitutional amendments have been done within the lifetimes of many (most?) living US citizens. Also, they've been done without violent havoc.
@eswag @grumble209 @su_liam @benroyce @Pepijn
That one took 203 years
Maybe not the best example of how the US Constitution can be amended without great difficulty.
-
@grumble209 @su_liam @benroyce @TCatInReality @Pepijn
The last one was done without a war in 1992. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
I agree that disenfranchising the oligarchy isn't going to be easy, but constitutional amendments have been done within the lifetimes of many (most?) living US citizens. Also, they've been done without violent havoc.
@eswag @grumble209 @su_liam @benroyce @Pepijn
That one took 203 years
Maybe not the best example of how the US Constitution can be amended without great difficulty.
-
@benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn Harris probably wouldn't have sunk a bunch of boats and murdered their sailors before kidnapping Maduro and stealing Venezuela's oil, but Harris would still have supported Israel killing and starving Palestinians just like Trump does.
I'm too much of a pussy to look at a starving Palestinian orphan being expelled to Africa and say - hey, you have to understand I was voting *strategically*.

Instead, I get really, really pissed off at the party assholes who put me in this position for the sake of the convenience of their donors.
@grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn "just like Trump does" is the tell on the bad-faith, both-sides BS here. When *any* support for a foreign intelligence-sharing allied state is falsely-equivalated to a formal pogrom and "Gaza-Riviera" - that's how you know the speaker is a unicorn-hunter divorced from reality
-
@n1xnx @TCatInReality @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn
Mathematical logic
I can just subtract 5-5
I dont have to do
5-1
4-1
3-1
2-1
and 1-1@TCatInReality @Pepijn @grumble209 @eswag @n1xnx @the5thColumnist @benroyce
I’ve never had the choice of -5 evil to vote for, but I do frequently have -1. The problem is usually getting enough of my neighbours to see and understand the assignment.
-
@grumble209 @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn
It's a nonsense post, if you think it's about primaries.
The flaws of democracy are never fixed by less engagement in democratic processes.
Sure, we can argue people are time short - and what can we do to address that. But concluding that you abandon the democratic process instead is wildly illogical.
@TCatInReality @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn I fully believe that active engagement in the primary process can lead to incremental improvements in a functioning democracy.
But I have no confidence that the DNC and the GOP are going to let themselves be reformed by primaries here in the United States of America in the year 2026.
But primaries are like prayer as a cure for cancer - it works best when combined with surgery and chemo. You can vote in primaries all you want, and it will improve your mental health. But don't skimp on Class War.
-
@TCatInReality @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn I fully believe that active engagement in the primary process can lead to incremental improvements in a functioning democracy.
But I have no confidence that the DNC and the GOP are going to let themselves be reformed by primaries here in the United States of America in the year 2026.
But primaries are like prayer as a cure for cancer - it works best when combined with surgery and chemo. You can vote in primaries all you want, and it will improve your mental health. But don't skimp on Class War.
@grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn
the first thing they would tell you in class war 101 is to vote
because voting is just a tactic like any other in a broad repertoire of tactics. no better or worse than any other
even just a vote used as vandalism or sabotage
to have antipathy to voting is merely an emotional block. it's self-serving, trying to justify a bad decision
rationalizations not to vote are absurd
so instead of resisting the obvious, change your bad decision:
vote
-
@TCatInReality @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn I fully believe that active engagement in the primary process can lead to incremental improvements in a functioning democracy.
But I have no confidence that the DNC and the GOP are going to let themselves be reformed by primaries here in the United States of America in the year 2026.
But primaries are like prayer as a cure for cancer - it works best when combined with surgery and chemo. You can vote in primaries all you want, and it will improve your mental health. But don't skimp on Class War.
@grumble209 @eswag @benroyce @Pepijn
Then delete or correct your "side hustle" post because you directly contradicted it.
If primaries are an important part (and not the only part) then your analogical attack on primaries completely leaves that out.
BTW, shifting metaphors is not a helpful way to have dialog. Smacks of bad faith.
-
@grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn
the first thing they would tell you in class war 101 is to vote
because voting is just a tactic like any other in a broad repertoire of tactics. no better or worse than any other
even just a vote used as vandalism or sabotage
to have antipathy to voting is merely an emotional block. it's self-serving, trying to justify a bad decision
rationalizations not to vote are absurd
so instead of resisting the obvious, change your bad decision:
vote
@benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

Again, the Mamdani win (and AOC and others) show that primaries *and a very engaged populace* are all we need to win elections and take power.
-
@grumble209 @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn "just like Trump does" is the tell on the bad-faith, both-sides BS here. When *any* support for a foreign intelligence-sharing allied state is falsely-equivalated to a formal pogrom and "Gaza-Riviera" - that's how you know the speaker is a unicorn-hunter divorced from reality
@paneerakbari @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn I'm sorry my unwillingness to cosign the bipartisan death machine of US foreign policy makes you think I'm divorced from reality. I'm not writing these toots to offend you.
I'm curious if you've travelled much outside of the US? Because the only people I've ever met who believe that there is more than one side to how the US treats the world are people who've only lived in the US. My friends and coworkers in Europe and Asia never seem to take it seriously. God knows the military folks I've served with couldn't see much of a difference.
But maybe it's like talking to a European about the subtle differences in baseball rules between the national and the american leagues? The rules are definitely not the same, but you have to be really into the game to appreciate those subtle differences.
-
@benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

Again, the Mamdani win (and AOC and others) show that primaries *and a very engaged populace* are all we need to win elections and take power.
@benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn
I'm still laughing at the thought that anyone believes in top down reform of the DNC (or GOP).
Just ten seconds thought: the donors are getting what they want and the "DNC" is just made up of humans. Unless there are new donors, and/or a massive influx of progressive people, it is not going to change.
Fortunately, the MAGA assault on the senses is waking up a lot of people and engaging them. I pray there is time.
-
E energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic