Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. While we do #Denmark #Danmark #USA #Greenland #Arctic drama, don't forget the #Inuit, the people who live there

While we do #Denmark #Danmark #USA #Greenland #Arctic drama, don't forget the #Inuit, the people who live there

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
denmarkdanmarkusagreenlandinuitaqqaluklyngeinuitataqatigiitcopenhagenimperialism
179 Beiträge 54 Kommentatoren 2 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • n1xnx@tilde.zoneN n1xnx@tilde.zone

    @TCatInReality @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

    It seems mathematically and logically obvious that the only way to get from "evil" to "not evil" passes through "less evil," so the choice of voting for "less evil" over not voting is both obvious and essential.

    (Of course, promoting and electing candidates who are better than the ones offered by the party establishments is also essential.)

    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tcatinreality@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #100

    @n1xnx @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

    Yes, and the only way to shift a party to "less evil" and then "good" is to get engaged in it.

    No one will ever change the Democratic party by refusing to support it.

    n1xnx@tilde.zoneN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • andersgundelach@mastodon.nuA andersgundelach@mastodon.nu

      @benroyce @phl

      You are right. The people in #Greenland worries about the future consequences of that.

      In 1968 an american B-52 crashed near Thule (now Pituffik) in Greenland and spread radioactive materials from the 4 hydrogen bombs it was carrying. Many of the people that cleaned up after that, got cancer.

      And now the people of Greenland worries for a hostile takeover from US too 😬

      atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      atlovato@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #101

      @andersgundelach @benroyce @phl - Scary shit indeed

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • the5thcolumnist@mstdn.caT the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca

        @n1xnx @TCatInReality @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

        Mathematical logic

        I can just subtract 5-5
        I dont have to do
        5-1
        4-1
        3-1
        2-1
        and 1-1

        tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tcatinreality@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #102

        @the5thColumnist @n1xnx @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

        JFC, we are talking about national elections with millions of people (and millions of views).

        You don't get to subtract 5 from 5 by yourself. You're influencing millions to make that move.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT tcatinreality@mastodon.social

          @n1xnx @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

          Yes, and the only way to shift a party to "less evil" and then "good" is to get engaged in it.

          No one will ever change the Democratic party by refusing to support it.

          n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
          n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
          n1xnx@tilde.zone
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #103

          @TCatInReality @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn
          Full agreement.

          However, my Democratic party support and engagement are directed toward those forces trying to reform the party; contributing to the DSCC and DLC PACs just props up the existing, failed leadership structure, so they can whistle.

          tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

            @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

            Well that would make sense if you lived on the moon

            But you live in the USA

            So you falsely believe you can afford yourself nonparticipation because the consequences don't effect you? They effect you

            grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grumble209@kolektiva.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #104

            @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn Weird that you believe that "not voting for a sociopath from the DNC or GOP" is the same as "non-participating". Especially when we're having this discussion on Mastodon, far far away from the mainstream social platforms because neither of us support those places. We're both participating in social media, right?

            I will always vote if there's a candidate I can support. But I won't support sociopaths - there's too much at stake to vote for a mildly sociopathic candidate if there are alternatives. That's a simple rule, and I'm honestly surprised that it's considered spicy, even on Mastodon.

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • grumble209@kolektiva.socialG grumble209@kolektiva.social

              @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn Weird that you believe that "not voting for a sociopath from the DNC or GOP" is the same as "non-participating". Especially when we're having this discussion on Mastodon, far far away from the mainstream social platforms because neither of us support those places. We're both participating in social media, right?

              I will always vote if there's a candidate I can support. But I won't support sociopaths - there's too much at stake to vote for a mildly sociopathic candidate if there are alternatives. That's a simple rule, and I'm honestly surprised that it's considered spicy, even on Mastodon.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #105

              @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

              You're using the word "sociopath" like it means "poopiehead"

              And you're avoiding the point

              If there is an election that doesn't effect you, but will negatively effect someone else, you won't vote and that negatively effected group can go to hell

              That's entitlement

              You won't act because how you feel about yourself is more important than real world effects

              That's the sum total of your precious "principles": self-serving self-regard

              tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT grumble209@kolektiva.socialG 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                @SeanPLynch @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

                If the "genocide joe" line is from Likud troll farm (it could be from another troll farm but the point is it's manipulation) then people not voting and thereby helping to elect Trump, as Netanyahu wanted, are therefore dutifully serving Netanyahu by not voting

                That's the real value of these nonvoters, and they don't see what manipulated fools they are

                seanplynch@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                seanplynch@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                seanplynch@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #106

                @benroyce @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

                In the USA, only about 30% to 40% of the eligible voters bother to vote. If you can make the election toxic, you can reduce that number even more.

                Then you don't need 20% points of the voters to win, you might only need 13% or 14%.

                A coalition of groups that always vote, like pro-life or gun rights groups will let you win with small numbers

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • n1xnx@tilde.zoneN n1xnx@tilde.zone

                  @TCatInReality @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn
                  Full agreement.

                  However, my Democratic party support and engagement are directed toward those forces trying to reform the party; contributing to the DSCC and DLC PACs just props up the existing, failed leadership structure, so they can whistle.

                  tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tcatinreality@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #107

                  @n1xnx @benroyce @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

                  100%. Total agreement.

                  I like Justice Democrats

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                    You're using the word "sociopath" like it means "poopiehead"

                    And you're avoiding the point

                    If there is an election that doesn't effect you, but will negatively effect someone else, you won't vote and that negatively effected group can go to hell

                    That's entitlement

                    You won't act because how you feel about yourself is more important than real world effects

                    That's the sum total of your precious "principles": self-serving self-regard

                    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tcatinreality@mastodon.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #108

                    @benroyce

                    I think there just wasting your time - and getting a boost from all your responses.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT tcatinreality@mastodon.social

                      @benroyce

                      I think there just wasting your time - and getting a boost from all your responses.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #109

                      @TCatInReality nah. It's just casual conversation

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                        You're using the word "sociopath" like it means "poopiehead"

                        And you're avoiding the point

                        If there is an election that doesn't effect you, but will negatively effect someone else, you won't vote and that negatively effected group can go to hell

                        That's entitlement

                        You won't act because how you feel about yourself is more important than real world effects

                        That's the sum total of your precious "principles": self-serving self-regard

                        grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grumble209@kolektiva.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #110

                        @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn You can draw your line where ever you want to draw it.

                        I'll continue to vote, but not for candidates on the wrong side of my line. I have other options - so do you. My life is too short to waste trying to unfuck the DNC without having billionaires of dollars to spread around.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • jmcclure@sciences.socialJ jmcclure@sciences.social

                          @benroyce @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

                          A sane voting system would resolve the misgivings about voting (e.g, ranked voting).

                          Most of my life I had not voted in presidential elections and thought much like the quote you refer to. I said I'd vote when I wanted to vote *for* someone, not against another.

                          DJT changed all that - I'll vote against pure evil any day.

                          But still, I'd be far more motivated to vote if I could vote my conscious (3rd party) without throwing my vote away.

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          smoog@mastodon.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #111

                          @jmcclure @benroyce @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn the whole throw away vote is insane concept. A third party is very necessary in a bipartisan prone system. Keeps them both in check. Imagine another party aside from the dems keeping Donald in check and also keeping dems in check. Now imagine how fast a no confidence vote could throw him right out on his ass on the slightest misstep.

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • S smoog@mastodon.social

                            @jmcclure @benroyce @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn the whole throw away vote is insane concept. A third party is very necessary in a bipartisan prone system. Keeps them both in check. Imagine another party aside from the dems keeping Donald in check and also keeping dems in check. Now imagine how fast a no confidence vote could throw him right out on his ass on the slightest misstep.

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #112

                            @Smoog @jmcclure @TCatInReality @grumble209 @eswag @Pepijn

                            do you live in the usa?

                            the usa is fptp

                            third party only works in other systems

                            third party can only be a spoiler here

                            it's not corruption, it's math

                            there could be viable third parties in the usa if we changed our voting system, like to ranked choice

                            otherwise "keeps them both in check" is not reality. where did you get this idea?

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • grumble209@kolektiva.socialG grumble209@kolektiva.social

                              @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn You can draw your line where ever you want to draw it.

                              I'll continue to vote, but not for candidates on the wrong side of my line. I have other options - so do you. My life is too short to waste trying to unfuck the DNC without having billionaires of dollars to spread around.

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #113

                              @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                              "I have other options"

                              what other options?

                              you vote and you matter or you don't and you don't

                              what other options are there?

                              grumble209@kolektiva.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                "I have other options"

                                what other options?

                                you vote and you matter or you don't and you don't

                                what other options are there?

                                grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grumble209@kolektiva.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #114

                                @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn My Washington state 2024 ballot had 10 candidates for US president. How many did yours have?

                                https://www.sos.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/Voters%20Pamphlet%202024%20-%20Edition%2021%20-%20Pend%20Orielle.pdf

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • grumble209@kolektiva.socialG grumble209@kolektiva.social

                                  @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn My Washington state 2024 ballot had 10 candidates for US president. How many did yours have?

                                  https://www.sos.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/Voters%20Pamphlet%202024%20-%20Edition%2021%20-%20Pend%20Orielle.pdf

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #115

                                  @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                  do you really need me to explain to you the value of a third party vote in an FPTP voting system?

                                  are you trolling?

                                  if you vote third party, you might as well vote for trump

                                  this is your great principles? not understanding your own voting system and bumbling into helping fascism?

                                  grumble209@kolektiva.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                    do you really need me to explain to you the value of a third party vote in an FPTP voting system?

                                    are you trolling?

                                    if you vote third party, you might as well vote for trump

                                    this is your great principles? not understanding your own voting system and bumbling into helping fascism?

                                    grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grumble209@kolektiva.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #116

                                    @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn I understand that the DNC and the GOP have so gerrymandered the states that voting outside of those two camps is unlikely to win. I understand the Electoral College predates political parties, and has been abused by partisans since its inception. We've had 235 years to unfuck this, but apparently we've always had more important things to do. God knows no other nation uses such an archaic system like we do.

                                    Maybe we'll change it after Trump dies. But the DNC has shown no appetite for meaningful change. I guess we'll see.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • grumble209@kolektiva.socialG grumble209@kolektiva.social

                                      @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn I understand that the DNC and the GOP have so gerrymandered the states that voting outside of those two camps is unlikely to win. I understand the Electoral College predates political parties, and has been abused by partisans since its inception. We've had 235 years to unfuck this, but apparently we've always had more important things to do. God knows no other nation uses such an archaic system like we do.

                                      Maybe we'll change it after Trump dies. But the DNC has shown no appetite for meaningful change. I guess we'll see.

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #117

                                      @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                      so 3rd party only serves as a spoiler in FPTP

                                      perot gave us clinton

                                      nader gave us bush2

                                      ranked choice is creeping in to the country, which will give us viable 3rd party

                                      the GOP in 2024 made a hardline stance against it so the democrats remain the only path forward. many corporatist dems oppose it, but some support it: it's how we got mamdani in NYC

                                      so we show up in the primaries and support dem candidates that support RCV

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                        @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                        so 3rd party only serves as a spoiler in FPTP

                                        perot gave us clinton

                                        nader gave us bush2

                                        ranked choice is creeping in to the country, which will give us viable 3rd party

                                        the GOP in 2024 made a hardline stance against it so the democrats remain the only path forward. many corporatist dems oppose it, but some support it: it's how we got mamdani in NYC

                                        so we show up in the primaries and support dem candidates that support RCV

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #118

                                        @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                        "Maybe we'll change it after Trump dies"

                                        we won't ever change it, with your attitude

                                        you need to fucking show up and act tactically with your vote

                                        it's the only way

                                        but apparently you have the entitlement to sit around and deliver uninformed cynicism on the topic

                                        must be nice

                                        grumble209@kolektiva.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @grumble209 @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn

                                          "Maybe we'll change it after Trump dies"

                                          we won't ever change it, with your attitude

                                          you need to fucking show up and act tactically with your vote

                                          it's the only way

                                          but apparently you have the entitlement to sit around and deliver uninformed cynicism on the topic

                                          must be nice

                                          grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grumble209@kolektiva.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grumble209@kolektiva.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #119

                                          @benroyce @TCatInReality @eswag @Pepijn I'm happy to help!

                                          We just need a Dem candidate who supports RCV and isn't a sociopath.

                                          Which probably means we're fucked, but lets be optimistic!

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum