Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
47 Beiträge 22 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

    I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

    djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    djgummikuh@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    djgummikuh@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #6

    @drmikepj being directly threatened by the risk of an ally invading another ally? Not so small beer in my book. Stay safe!

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • P proscience@toot.community

      @drmikepj

      And yet, this was a possible scenario ever since Trump sought the presidential candidacy, long before he got elected.

      connynasch@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      connynasch@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      connynasch@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #7

      @proscience @drmikepj he has eyed Greenland for decades. I just posted this on my site - it is a realistic view not seen elsewhere: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDSzUfMZRHE

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

        I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

        pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
        pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
        pthane@toot.wales
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #8

        @drmikepj
        Having assessed the risk, do you now have to outline your plans to mitigate it? That should be interesting.

        drmikepj@mastodon.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • P proscience@toot.community

          @drmikepj

          And yet, this was a possible scenario ever since Trump sought the presidential candidacy, long before he got elected.

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          proscience@toot.community
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #9

          @drmikepj

          TBH, I'm convinced he wouldn't be anywhere near it if not the Heritage Foundation fascists and the Silicon Valley fascists are actively pushing for it.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • pthane@toot.walesP pthane@toot.wales

            @drmikepj
            Having assessed the risk, do you now have to outline your plans to mitigate it? That should be interesting.

            drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drmikepj@mastodon.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #10

            @pthane yes - basically we’ll cancel the fieldtrip if there’s a US military buildup before we leave the UK, and in any case we’ll make additional arrangements with the university and UK government science officials so people know where we are in case there’s a surprise

            mloxton@med-mastodon.comM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

              I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

              N This user is from outside of this forum
              N This user is from outside of this forum
              n0tsure@mastodon.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #11

              @drmikepj 55000 inhabitqnts give or take. One mil each = 55 bils. Add another few bils for destabilization and fake whatever. Chump change.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

                xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                xs4me2@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #12

                @drmikepj

                I would, and I’m not to sure about my convention in Vancouver in the summer…

                It all sounds like a black mirror episode.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                  I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

                  skyluke@bolha.usS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skyluke@bolha.usS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skyluke@bolha.us
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #13

                  @drmikepj I am afraid of a world with just one big global power. But Trump is working hard to make sure China rises to that position.

                  T 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                    I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

                    trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    trelord75@aus.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #14

                    @drmikepj

                    The real question is evaluating that risk given it's all at whim, could be good, could be bad, anyway which way the wind blows?

                    drmikepj@mastodon.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • skyluke@bolha.usS skyluke@bolha.us

                      @drmikepj I am afraid of a world with just one big global power. But Trump is working hard to make sure China rises to that position.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      tomala@mastodon.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #15

                      @SkyLuke @drmikepj

                      I think that in this case, the opposite is true.
                      After ~ 30 years, they woke up to the fact that capitalist greed had created a monster.
                      What we are now witnessing are convulsions in the face of an existential threat!

                      skyluke@bolha.usS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • trelord75@aus.socialT trelord75@aus.social

                        @drmikepj

                        The real question is evaluating that risk given it's all at whim, could be good, could be bad, anyway which way the wind blows?

                        drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        drmikepj@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #16

                        @trelord75 I don’t need to quantify the risk particularly, but I do need to think about what would prompt me to cancel the trip before departure, or bring everyone home mid-trip. In both cases a military buildup nearby would be a trigger to cancel the trip and go home.

                        trelord75@aus.socialT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                          @trelord75 I don’t need to quantify the risk particularly, but I do need to think about what would prompt me to cancel the trip before departure, or bring everyone home mid-trip. In both cases a military buildup nearby would be a trigger to cancel the trip and go home.

                          trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          trelord75@aus.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #17

                          @drmikepj

                          True but given the proximity, how close is enough, what is the range of the assets required to do what they might want to do, be logical is a good starting point, preempt it, long range bombing you may not know, but why would they bomb what they might need, surgical strikes more likely, so watch military movements, ships leaving, where are they going, carriers with required shorter range assets to do the job.

                          That's what I'd be looking at, no surprises, eliminate the possibilities, or confirm it, and leave.

                          drmikepj@mastodon.socialD trelord75@aus.socialT 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • T tomala@mastodon.social

                            @SkyLuke @drmikepj

                            I think that in this case, the opposite is true.
                            After ~ 30 years, they woke up to the fact that capitalist greed had created a monster.
                            What we are now witnessing are convulsions in the face of an existential threat!

                            skyluke@bolha.usS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skyluke@bolha.usS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skyluke@bolha.us
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #18

                            @tomala @drmikepj Yes, but instead of trying to evolve they want to make the entire world go back to the past by force. While everyone goes away from fossil fuels, they are invading a nation yet again to get their oil.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • trelord75@aus.socialT trelord75@aus.social

                              @drmikepj

                              True but given the proximity, how close is enough, what is the range of the assets required to do what they might want to do, be logical is a good starting point, preempt it, long range bombing you may not know, but why would they bomb what they might need, surgical strikes more likely, so watch military movements, ships leaving, where are they going, carriers with required shorter range assets to do the job.

                              That's what I'd be looking at, no surprises, eliminate the possibilities, or confirm it, and leave.

                              drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              drmikepj@mastodon.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #19

                              @trelord75 I know the typical US military air movements for a normal season (I’ve even flown on some of them, as military aircraft support science projects) and so any OSINT showing ships, helicopters, tanker aircraft or non-transport aircraft in the area will indicate something will happen.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • trelord75@aus.socialT trelord75@aus.social

                                @drmikepj

                                True but given the proximity, how close is enough, what is the range of the assets required to do what they might want to do, be logical is a good starting point, preempt it, long range bombing you may not know, but why would they bomb what they might need, surgical strikes more likely, so watch military movements, ships leaving, where are they going, carriers with required shorter range assets to do the job.

                                That's what I'd be looking at, no surprises, eliminate the possibilities, or confirm it, and leave.

                                trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                trelord75@aus.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #20

                                @drmikepj

                                Also worth noting, the other place is tropical, your destination is ice covered, they need established assets to gain any foothold, if they destroy them then they would have to build, already defeated themselves if they do that.

                                drmikepj@mastodon.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • trelord75@aus.socialT trelord75@aus.social

                                  @drmikepj

                                  Also worth noting, the other place is tropical, your destination is ice covered, they need established assets to gain any foothold, if they destroy them then they would have to build, already defeated themselves if they do that.

                                  drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  drmikepj@mastodon.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #21

                                  @trelord75 Greenland isn’t all ice-covered, and all the populated areas are just tundra. Seisure of strategic locations (airports) would be the obvious military objective. Greenland has no internal roads so everything travels by air or sea.

                                  drmikepj@mastodon.socialD trelord75@aus.socialT 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                                    I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

                                    epicdemiologist@wandering.shopE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    epicdemiologist@wandering.shopE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    epicdemiologist@wandering.shop
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #22

                                    @drmikepj My kid just turned down an invitation from a British friend to join them for eclipse-viewing in Iceland this summer--because my kid is trans, and was afraid they wouldn't be let back into the US.

                                    drmikepj@mastodon.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                                      @trelord75 Greenland isn’t all ice-covered, and all the populated areas are just tundra. Seisure of strategic locations (airports) would be the obvious military objective. Greenland has no internal roads so everything travels by air or sea.

                                      drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      drmikepj@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      drmikepj@mastodon.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #23

                                      @trelord75 my main concern is the ensuing logistical chaos after an invasion, rather than the relatively small risk of being killed by military action

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                                        @trelord75 Greenland isn’t all ice-covered, and all the populated areas are just tundra. Seisure of strategic locations (airports) would be the obvious military objective. Greenland has no internal roads so everything travels by air or sea.

                                        trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        trelord75@aus.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        trelord75@aus.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #24

                                        @drmikepj

                                        I just keep thinking of the Team Amer1kkka theme song, ckfu yeah, coming through to save ...

                                        Those guys are gunna have a field day with all this junk, and so they should.

                                        (obligatory "Matt Damon" as a sign of love & respect)

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                                        • drmikepj@mastodon.socialD drmikepj@mastodon.social

                                          I know this is pretty small beer in the light of world events, but I was not expecting to have to write “risk of invasion by the USA” into the risk assessment for my fieldwork in Greenland in June.

                                          angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          angelascholder@mastodon.energyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          angelascholder@mastodon.energy
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #25

                                          @drmikepj A year ago that would indeed have been a far fetched idea.
                                          But, the announcements have been repeated already multiple times since.

                                          drmikepj@mastodon.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum