Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
-
@antdude Indeed. Maybe it's time to treat all websites as hostile until demonstrated otherwise.
@mike i disable cookies for them but sometimes they dont work wo cookies
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this! -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike I use ublock to select the area and block it. Sometimes, I have to do that several times before the article is readable. Other times, disabling javascript works.
It's a faff, but cookie pop-ups are malicious compliance and should be treated as such
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike
me too, I can’t be bothered with rubbish choices, sometimes I find the article another way via my browser otherwise it’s no keep it -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!@mike My behavioral pattern is the same as yours.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!I would appreciate it if someone who has tested could weigh in on the following:
1-What are 'necessary' or 'functional' cookies some sites require. Is there really such a thing?
2-Does clicking 'reject all' or 'only necessary' do anything? Or are these placebo buttons?
Note: I'm looking for someone who has tested whether these result in no or limited cookies, not just what your guess is.
-
@mike @zigi_now9 this is why I use my browsers reader mode most the time. If it’s not obnoxious cookie consent pop ups, it’s auto playing videos and cluttered page designs ugh
@QueerMatters @zigi_now9 Yep, all of the above.
-
@mike This makes it easier. Not perfect, but helps.
@bastardsheep Yes, I do use it, but its coverage is disappointingly thin.
-
I would appreciate it if someone who has tested could weigh in on the following:
1-What are 'necessary' or 'functional' cookies some sites require. Is there really such a thing?
2-Does clicking 'reject all' or 'only necessary' do anything? Or are these placebo buttons?
Note: I'm looking for someone who has tested whether these result in no or limited cookies, not just what your guess is.
@Wintergr33n I agree, it would be very good to know this for a selection of sites.
(There ARE such things as essentially cookies, of course, if you're leaving comments as a particular person, putting items in a shopping cart, or similar. But never just to read an article.
-
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this! -
Over the last few weeks I have noticed a behaviour in myself.
If I follow a link and I get a "We care about your privacy" popup, I click the "Reject all" button and read the article.
But if there is no "Reject all" button, just a link to a complicated set of preferences, I simply close the window and never see what the article had to say.
I wonder how many others do this.
And how many web-sites are losing A LOT of their traffic for this reason.
—
UPDATE: see replies, lots of people do this!Agree with these comments & actions.
Also, if the article has information worth reading I will also share an archive link.
-
I ixi@mastodon.online shared this topic
