Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
79 Beiträge 57 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

    @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

    At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

    spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    spycrab@kolektiva.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #13

    @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

    kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

      @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

      mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
      mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
      mkj@social.mkj.earth
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #14

      @kwayk42 Nudge one a kilometer off position and hello our old friend Kessler.

      @sundogplanets

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • spycrab@kolektiva.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.social

        @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        kwayk42@sechtor.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #15

        @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

        #JustWannaBuildARailgun

        superball@norcal.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.socialS 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • pthenq1@mastodon.laP pthenq1@mastodon.la

          @sundogplanets
          For the data centers.

          They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

          Earth will have a ring

          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #16

          @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

          The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

          Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mkj@social.mkj.earthM mkj@social.mkj.earth

            @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

            Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

            I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkj@social.mkj.earth
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #17

            I really can't help but feel that someone, somewhere, saw the term "megaconstellation" and said "let's have an *actual* mega-constellation!"

            @sundogplanets

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

              THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autos
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #18

              @sundogplanets I would ask if you were fucking serious and why the FCC hasn't thrown it out, but calling the people left there "clownshoes" is an unforgivable insult to the footwear of professional entertainers.

              Also, worth noting, that isn't even fucking *ZERO* on the Kardashev because that's not even a goddamn relevant scale. Please somebody start fucking executing these techbro oligarchs to save the rest of us.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                hfinyow@mstdn.ca
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #19

                @sundogplanets at this number of satellites, we're in the domain where the Russians and Chinese might start shooting them down as they would take up orbital real estate for their own networks to compete with Starlink

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                  @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                  #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                  superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  superball@norcal.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #20

                  @kwayk42 🤭🤍

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schrotthaufen@mastodon.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #21

                    @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF riaresists@mastodon.socialR 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS schrotthaufen@mastodon.social

                      @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #22

                      @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets 😭🤬

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

                        @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #23

                        @CStamp @sundogplanets

                        "Because FUCK the rest of the world" - USA

                        (Always has been)

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                          @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                          #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spycrab@kolektiva.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #24

                          @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets if you shoot them they become a hazard for everything up there.

                          What's worse than a million starlinks
                          Several billion in trackable small starlinks

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #25

                            I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                            Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                            grb090423@mastodon.socialG mariyadelano@hachyderm.ioM heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH palmandneedle@norden.socialP isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 6 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                              herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                              herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                              herrlorenz@chaos.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #26

                              @sundogplanets The CO2 footprint for the launches alone must be terrible? 🤔

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                angusm@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                angusm@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                angusm@mastodon.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #27

                                @sundogplanets

                                The world's most heartbreaking six-word stories:

                                1906: For sale. Baby shoes. Never worn.

                                2026: Orbital data centers for artificial intelligence.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                                  Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                                  grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grb090423@mastodon.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #28

                                  @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social

                                  Added to my To Read list.

                                  Enjoy the sunrise and buddies. Hope you got a bit of sleep 🤞

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                    @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

                                    cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cy@fedicy.us.to
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #29
                                    It better be portable!

                                    CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                    kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                      jakebrake@ohai.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jakebrake@ohai.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jakebrake@ohai.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #30

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Bezos: Oh yeah? Well AWS will put TWO million data centers in orbit!

                                      China: Let 5 million space data centers bloom!

                                      Musk: Well, then SpaceX will put TEN million centers in orbit!

                                      Bezos: Fine! ELEVENTY million AWS centers!

                                      Musk: Hah! TWELVETY million SpaceX centers! Each with a cool robot!

                                      Bezos: Meh-meh-meh-robot-meh. Amazon has robots.

                                      Musk: But not COOL robots.

                                      m0khr@mastodon.radioM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • cy@fedicy.us.toC cy@fedicy.us.to
                                        It better be portable!

                                        CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kwayk42@sechtor.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #31

                                        @cy @sundogplanets 🤔🤔🤔 so you're saying I should build it on a boat?

                                        cy@fedicy.us.toC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                          @cy @sundogplanets 🤔🤔🤔 so you're saying I should build it on a boat?

                                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.to
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #32
                                          Not enough cover. Build it on a pickup truck!

                                          CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum