Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
79 Beiträge 57 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cstamp@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #2

    @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

    grb090423@mastodon.socialG davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #3

      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

      kiloku@burnthis.townK rootwyrm@weird.autosR schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS jakebrake@ohai.socialJ 11 Antworten Letzte Antwort
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

        espanabizarra@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        espanabizarra@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        espanabizarra@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #4

        @sundogplanets So now Musk wants to jump in the data center wagon, so he can get VC funding. Too late, that bubble will burst this very same year.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

          kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kwayk42@sechtor.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #5

          @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

          dougwade@mastodon.xyzD mkj@social.mkj.earthM cy@fedicy.us.toC 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

            pthenq1@mastodon.laP This user is from outside of this forum
            pthenq1@mastodon.laP This user is from outside of this forum
            pthenq1@mastodon.la
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #6

            @sundogplanets
            For the data centers.

            They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

            Earth will have a ring

            angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

              @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

              dougwade@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
              dougwade@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
              dougwade@mastodon.xyz
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #7

              @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

              kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

                @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

                grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grb090423@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #8

                @CStamp @sundogplanets

                This!

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • dougwade@mastodon.xyzD dougwade@mastodon.xyz

                  @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

                  kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kwayk42@sechtor.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #9

                  @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

                  At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

                  spycrab@kolektiva.socialS ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                    spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spycrab@kolektiva.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #10

                    @sundogplanets need more deorbit star link propaganda

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                      mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkj@social.mkj.earth
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #11

                      @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                      Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                      I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                      mkj@social.mkj.earthM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                        kiloku@burnthis.townK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kiloku@burnthis.townK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kiloku@burnthis.town
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #12

                        @sundogplanets not that it matters, but it also wouldn't budge a thing in the kardashev scale, as it's supposed to measure how much power civilization can harness, and they certainly would pale in comparison to the total amount of earth based computing power, not to mention all the power used in non-computing usage

                        michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                          @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

                          At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spycrab@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spycrab@kolektiva.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #13

                          @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                          kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                            @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

                            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkj@social.mkj.earth
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #14

                            @kwayk42 Nudge one a kilometer off position and hello our old friend Kessler.

                            @sundogplanets

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • spycrab@kolektiva.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.social

                              @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                              kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kwayk42@sechtor.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #15

                              @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                              #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                              superball@norcal.socialS spycrab@kolektiva.socialS 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • pthenq1@mastodon.laP pthenq1@mastodon.la

                                @sundogplanets
                                For the data centers.

                                They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

                                Earth will have a ring

                                angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #16

                                @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                                The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

                                Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

                                mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mkj@social.mkj.earthM mkj@social.mkj.earth

                                  @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                                  Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                                  I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mkj@social.mkj.earth
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #17

                                  I really can't help but feel that someone, somewhere, saw the term "megaconstellation" and said "let's have an *actual* mega-constellation!"

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #18

                                    @sundogplanets I would ask if you were fucking serious and why the FCC hasn't thrown it out, but calling the people left there "clownshoes" is an unforgivable insult to the footwear of professional entertainers.

                                    Also, worth noting, that isn't even fucking *ZERO* on the Kardashev because that's not even a goddamn relevant scale. Please somebody start fucking executing these techbro oligarchs to save the rest of us.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                      hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hfinyow@mstdn.caH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hfinyow@mstdn.ca
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #19

                                      @sundogplanets at this number of satellites, we're in the domain where the Russians and Chinese might start shooting them down as they would take up orbital real estate for their own networks to compete with Starlink

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                        @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                        #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                        superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        superball@norcal.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        superball@norcal.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #20

                                        @kwayk42 🤭🤍

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                          schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schrotthaufen@mastodon.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #21

                                          @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                          faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF riaresists@mastodon.socialR 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum