Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
107 Beiträge 70 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

    The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

    A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

    rhizomancer@todon.euR This user is from outside of this forum
    rhizomancer@todon.euR This user is from outside of this forum
    rhizomancer@todon.eu
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #12

    @mullvadnet Look what's going on in Spain as well: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/la-liga-wins-court-order-requiring-nordvpn-and-proton-vpn-to-block-illegal-football-streams-in-spain-but-vpn-firms-say-they-have-not-been-notified

    adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

      The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

      A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

      goowose@mk.absturztau.beG This user is from outside of this forum
      goowose@mk.absturztau.beG This user is from outside of this forum
      goowose@mk.absturztau.be
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #13

      @mullvadnet@mastodon.online at this point i will just straight up not use the internet

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
        petealexharris@mastodon.scot
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #14

        @mullvadnet
        They'll have to *really* fast track it if they want to pass it before we yeet them into the rubbish bin of history. Government by announcement only gets you so far when your polls are collapsing and your own guys are saying you should resign.

        And even if they do, the next government can repeal it easily, because hasty legislation reactively banning things doesn't have any complicated infrastructure to tear down or budget gaps to cover. It can just go away.

        glaswolf@mastodon.scotG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA alexanderdyas@mindly.social

          @mullvadnet How on earth is this even enforceable?

          hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.comH This user is from outside of this forum
          hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.comH This user is from outside of this forum
          hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #15
          @alexanderdyas @mullvadnet It isn't, and I assume it's the point. Make the law vague enough that anyone can be prosecuted under it.
          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • zeitverschreib@freundica.deZ zeitverschreib@freundica.de shared this topic
          • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

            The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

            A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #16

            @mullvadnet So often, systems like government, sports clubs, businesses have such unscalable paths to the influencing of decision makers that they learn very fast that they can be authoritative and selfish with precious little interference.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

              The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

              A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

              dotfox@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dotfox@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dotfox@mastodon.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #17

              @mullvadnet curious timing. just about an hour ago I forged and verified my first zero knowledge proof that can tell the verifier that proof holder was born before a certain timestamp (aka. older than N years) at the same time reveling absolutely (!) nothing about proof holders, not even those who authorize it.

              fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF P cholling@bytes.programming.devC 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • nemo@mas.toN nemo@mas.to

                @mullvadnet With all due respect. The UK government can you f… themselfes.

                You folks are great tho ❤️ 💪 🙏

                greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                greatlaketrout@noc.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #18

                @nemo @mullvadnet

                This is exactly my point as well. The EU has done some great things in digital privacy laws and yet they still want to do dumb shit. I am appaled with the issues with CSAM and I agree something needs to be done. I also agree with the deplorable ways in which social media has infected society - howver, the answer is not to destroy privacy.

                L 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                  The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                  A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                  greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  greatlaketrout@noc.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #19

                  @mullvadnet

                  Requiring every VPN user to verify their age to stop a few bad actors is like requiring everyone to show government ID to buy a hammer because a few people used hammers to commit crimes.

                  2something@transfem.social2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                    @mullvadnet
                    They'll have to *really* fast track it if they want to pass it before we yeet them into the rubbish bin of history. Government by announcement only gets you so far when your polls are collapsing and your own guys are saying you should resign.

                    And even if they do, the next government can repeal it easily, because hasty legislation reactively banning things doesn't have any complicated infrastructure to tear down or budget gaps to cover. It can just go away.

                    glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                    glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                    glaswolf@mastodon.scot
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #20

                    @petealexharris @mullvadnet But do we think Nigel and Cruella will be so inclined?

                    petealexharris@mastodon.scotP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                      The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                      A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #21

                      @mullvadnet

                      The revolution cannot come soon enough

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • glaswolf@mastodon.scotG glaswolf@mastodon.scot

                        @petealexharris @mullvadnet But do we think Nigel and Cruella will be so inclined?

                        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                        petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #22

                        @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                        If they get in we all have worse problems. However, let's see.

                        If I had to predict, I'd say the vote will be so unprecedentedly split that there is no way for any one party to form a government without at least a confidence-and-supply deal including the Greens (or in the extreme case, the Greens+SNP+LibDem)

                        Deform UK Ltd simply *cannot* negotiate such a deal. So I don't think Farage's blackshirts are going to be forming the next government.

                        glaswolf@mastodon.scotG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                          @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                          If they get in we all have worse problems. However, let's see.

                          If I had to predict, I'd say the vote will be so unprecedentedly split that there is no way for any one party to form a government without at least a confidence-and-supply deal including the Greens (or in the extreme case, the Greens+SNP+LibDem)

                          Deform UK Ltd simply *cannot* negotiate such a deal. So I don't think Farage's blackshirts are going to be forming the next government.

                          glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                          glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                          glaswolf@mastodon.scot
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #23

                          @petealexharris @mullvadnet I hope you're right, but I wouldn't count out Reform and the rump of the old Tory party getting over the line.

                          petealexharris@mastodon.scotP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                            The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                            A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                            charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #24

                            @mullvadnet

                            phase 2 is requiring everyone to use an approved vpn aka government "gateway".

                            because right now, you can access the internet via all kinds of entry pints - from your broadband at home, to your 4G mobile, to the cafe wifi, etc and it makes it a little less convenient to surveil you.

                            much easier if all your traffic goes through the approved ID-verifying gateway.

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                              The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                              A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                              falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                              falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                              falken@qoto.org
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #25

                              @mullvadnet devil very much in the detail! Is ssh a VPN?

                              pionir@masto.bikeP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #26

                                @mullvadnet

                                How that would be enforced with VPN suppliers in other countries will be interesting to see.

                                I suspect some of them will tell the UK.GOV to fuck off, which is the correct response.

                                anguadelphine@mk.absturztau.beA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                  The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                  A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                  tobiwankenobi@kolektiva.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tobiwankenobi@kolektiva.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tobiwankenobi@kolektiva.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #27

                                  @mullvadnet

                                  Following in the steps of its big brother across the Atlantic, huh?

                                  Another country to stay the hell away from. Duly noted.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                    @mullvadnet

                                    How that would be enforced with VPN suppliers in other countries will be interesting to see.

                                    I suspect some of them will tell the UK.GOV to fuck off, which is the correct response.

                                    anguadelphine@mk.absturztau.beA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    anguadelphine@mk.absturztau.beA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    anguadelphine@mk.absturztau.be
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #28

                                    @simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                    Well I certainly will.
                                    So sick of websites throwing hissy fits if you are using one.

                                    @mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • glaswolf@mastodon.scotG glaswolf@mastodon.scot

                                      @petealexharris @mullvadnet I hope you're right, but I wouldn't count out Reform and the rump of the old Tory party getting over the line.

                                      petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #29

                                      @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                                      The only reason I'd call that unlikely is the same reason there's any danger from Reform at all: we don't have PR.

                                      In a first-past-the-post system, the two far right parties are going to be parasitising and splitting each other's votes in most constituencies.

                                      petealexharris@mastodon.scotP djstreethawk@mastodon.scotD zbrown@floss.socialZ 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                                        @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                                        The only reason I'd call that unlikely is the same reason there's any danger from Reform at all: we don't have PR.

                                        In a first-past-the-post system, the two far right parties are going to be parasitising and splitting each other's votes in most constituencies.

                                        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #30

                                        @GlasWolf @mullvadnet

                                        I'm setting myself up for the most naively optimistic prediction followed by the most crushing disappointment aren't I?

                                        Anyway...

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • dotfox@mastodon.socialD dotfox@mastodon.social

                                          @mullvadnet curious timing. just about an hour ago I forged and verified my first zero knowledge proof that can tell the verifier that proof holder was born before a certain timestamp (aka. older than N years) at the same time reveling absolutely (!) nothing about proof holders, not even those who authorize it.

                                          fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #31

                                          @dotfox @mullvadnet why are you working on tech to help the Nazis?

                                          wojtek@social.vivaldi.netW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum