Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
107 Beiträge 70 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

    The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

    A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

    alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    alexanderdyas@mindly.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #6

    @mullvadnet How on earth is this even enforceable?

    hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.comH michaelgemar@mstdn.caM 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

      The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

      A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

      electrofetish@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      electrofetish@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      electrofetish@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #7

      @mullvadnet This is a struggle between commercial interests. Non-commercial projects are unlikely to be affected. VPNs are tools not only for bypassing blocks but primarily for creating your own network on top of the main one.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

        inwis@nerdculture.deI This user is from outside of this forum
        inwis@nerdculture.deI This user is from outside of this forum
        inwis@nerdculture.de
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #8

        @mullvadnet So everyone should use a VPN, always.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

          The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

          A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

          nemo@mas.toN This user is from outside of this forum
          nemo@mas.toN This user is from outside of this forum
          nemo@mas.to
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #9

          @mullvadnet With all due respect. The UK government can you f… themselfes.

          You folks are great tho ❤️ 💪 🙏

          greatlaketrout@noc.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

            The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

            A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

            dps910@social.freedombits.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            dps910@social.freedombits.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            dps910@social.freedombits.org
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #10
            @mullvadnet hopefully mullvad will still be able to be used by UK users, it is my favorite VPN

            I'm thankful for its existence thanks for the work you do
            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            1
            0
            • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

              The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

              A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

              odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
              odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
              odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #11

              @mullvadnet lol. This is an admission of failure if I've ever seen one. Since their safety nonsense tanked due to VPN existence, they're now trying an arms race. Good luck with that.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • bricks@det.socialB bricks@det.social shared this topic
              • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                rhizomancer@todon.euR This user is from outside of this forum
                rhizomancer@todon.euR This user is from outside of this forum
                rhizomancer@todon.eu
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #12

                @mullvadnet Look what's going on in Spain as well: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/la-liga-wins-court-order-requiring-nordvpn-and-proton-vpn-to-block-illegal-football-streams-in-spain-but-vpn-firms-say-they-have-not-been-notified

                adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                  The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                  A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                  goowose@mk.absturztau.beG This user is from outside of this forum
                  goowose@mk.absturztau.beG This user is from outside of this forum
                  goowose@mk.absturztau.be
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #13

                  @mullvadnet@mastodon.online at this point i will just straight up not use the internet

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                    The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                    A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                    petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                    petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                    petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #14

                    @mullvadnet
                    They'll have to *really* fast track it if they want to pass it before we yeet them into the rubbish bin of history. Government by announcement only gets you so far when your polls are collapsing and your own guys are saying you should resign.

                    And even if they do, the next government can repeal it easily, because hasty legislation reactively banning things doesn't have any complicated infrastructure to tear down or budget gaps to cover. It can just go away.

                    glaswolf@mastodon.scotG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA alexanderdyas@mindly.social

                      @mullvadnet How on earth is this even enforceable?

                      hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.comH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.comH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #15
                      @alexanderdyas @mullvadnet It isn't, and I assume it's the point. Make the law vague enough that anyone can be prosecuted under it.
                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • zeitverschreib@freundica.deZ zeitverschreib@freundica.de shared this topic
                      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #16

                        @mullvadnet So often, systems like government, sports clubs, businesses have such unscalable paths to the influencing of decision makers that they learn very fast that they can be authoritative and selfish with precious little interference.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                          The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                          A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                          dotfox@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dotfox@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dotfox@mastodon.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #17

                          @mullvadnet curious timing. just about an hour ago I forged and verified my first zero knowledge proof that can tell the verifier that proof holder was born before a certain timestamp (aka. older than N years) at the same time reveling absolutely (!) nothing about proof holders, not even those who authorize it.

                          fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF P cholling@bytes.programming.devC 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • nemo@mas.toN nemo@mas.to

                            @mullvadnet With all due respect. The UK government can you f… themselfes.

                            You folks are great tho ❤️ 💪 🙏

                            greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greatlaketrout@noc.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #18

                            @nemo @mullvadnet

                            This is exactly my point as well. The EU has done some great things in digital privacy laws and yet they still want to do dumb shit. I am appaled with the issues with CSAM and I agree something needs to be done. I also agree with the deplorable ways in which social media has infected society - howver, the answer is not to destroy privacy.

                            L 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                              The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                              A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                              greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              greatlaketrout@noc.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #19

                              @mullvadnet

                              Requiring every VPN user to verify their age to stop a few bad actors is like requiring everyone to show government ID to buy a hammer because a few people used hammers to commit crimes.

                              2something@transfem.social2 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                                @mullvadnet
                                They'll have to *really* fast track it if they want to pass it before we yeet them into the rubbish bin of history. Government by announcement only gets you so far when your polls are collapsing and your own guys are saying you should resign.

                                And even if they do, the next government can repeal it easily, because hasty legislation reactively banning things doesn't have any complicated infrastructure to tear down or budget gaps to cover. It can just go away.

                                glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                                glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                                glaswolf@mastodon.scot
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #20

                                @petealexharris @mullvadnet But do we think Nigel and Cruella will be so inclined?

                                petealexharris@mastodon.scotP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                  The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                  A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #21

                                  @mullvadnet

                                  The revolution cannot come soon enough

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • glaswolf@mastodon.scotG glaswolf@mastodon.scot

                                    @petealexharris @mullvadnet But do we think Nigel and Cruella will be so inclined?

                                    petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #22

                                    @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                                    If they get in we all have worse problems. However, let's see.

                                    If I had to predict, I'd say the vote will be so unprecedentedly split that there is no way for any one party to form a government without at least a confidence-and-supply deal including the Greens (or in the extreme case, the Greens+SNP+LibDem)

                                    Deform UK Ltd simply *cannot* negotiate such a deal. So I don't think Farage's blackshirts are going to be forming the next government.

                                    glaswolf@mastodon.scotG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                                      @GlasWolf @mullvadnet
                                      If they get in we all have worse problems. However, let's see.

                                      If I had to predict, I'd say the vote will be so unprecedentedly split that there is no way for any one party to form a government without at least a confidence-and-supply deal including the Greens (or in the extreme case, the Greens+SNP+LibDem)

                                      Deform UK Ltd simply *cannot* negotiate such a deal. So I don't think Farage's blackshirts are going to be forming the next government.

                                      glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      glaswolf@mastodon.scotG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      glaswolf@mastodon.scot
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #23

                                      @petealexharris @mullvadnet I hope you're right, but I wouldn't count out Reform and the rump of the old Tory party getting over the line.

                                      petealexharris@mastodon.scotP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #24

                                        @mullvadnet

                                        phase 2 is requiring everyone to use an approved vpn aka government "gateway".

                                        because right now, you can access the internet via all kinds of entry pints - from your broadband at home, to your 4G mobile, to the cafe wifi, etc and it makes it a little less convenient to surveil you.

                                        much easier if all your traffic goes through the approved ID-verifying gateway.

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                          The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                          A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                          falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          falken@qoto.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          falken@qoto.org
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #25

                                          @mullvadnet devil very much in the detail! Is ssh a VPN?

                                          pionir@masto.bikeP 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum