C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog this makes sense: the C-suite people don't have time to read all the thoughtful documents generated by workers and middle-management, and AI summaries same them the trouble.
we'll refrain from getting into whatever blindness prevents them from seeing that important divergence in how work-time is spent within their company.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog As usual, the truth is somewhere between the two extremes.
*When* I've used AI, it has saved me considerable time. But I have used it *rarely* - only in those cases, when I *knew* that it would save me time. If I had to worth with AI every day, all the time, it would probably waste more time than it would save - because I'd have to constantly check its mistakes.
The point I am trying to make is that AI *is* useful but it has *niche* application. It's a tool, not a cure-all. People should be *taught* when using it is beneficial - which is by far not all the time. And it definitely shouldn't be stuffed into every app and web site.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog if a C-suite is running multiple company like elon musk with tesla, spaceX and Xai, saving more than 12h a week means they could be entirely replaced by bullshit machine
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog Wow this goes to show how disconnected the C suites are from reality and how they are getting manipulated to believe in the lie of AI will solve everything.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog @Urban_Hermit "CEOs find out they don't actually work"
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog
I don't suppose anybody has a gift article for this? -
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog excellent, we finally have a reason to replace C suite with GenAI
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog we had a similar questionaire in our company (initiated by C-suites) and there was no option to select "no time saved or time lost"... the choices were just less than 4h, 4-12h, 12-16h and more than 16h. they were not asking how much time we actually save. it was a trick question. kind of like "how much do you love big brother?"
-
This is a great point. It is only asking about time saved, when it should ask how much time is wasted as well.
@sauc3 @GossiTheDog won’t go down well with the people selling stuff and upping prices because of the AI….
It certainly wastes my time with people sending me absolute nonsense blatantly generated by AI.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog that's because the C-suite talks mansplaining bullshit, unlike the rest of us.
-
@GossiTheDog so what this really says, is that AI could probably replace C-suite roles easier than it could replace worker roles
@dee @GossiTheDog I like this take
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog
When this all finally crashes and burns it's gonna look like Kepler on Earth. -
@sauc3 @GossiTheDog won’t go down well with the people selling stuff and upping prices because of the AI….
It certainly wastes my time with people sending me absolute nonsense blatantly generated by AI.
Maybe I'm an optimist, but I refuse to believe that "AI" is inevitable. I think the more people that resist, and point out the problems, the more likely it will go away.
I don't disagree with you that the powers that be are pushing "AI" and aren't going to give a fair shot to both sides of the discussion. But I'm not willing to just give up and accept that it's inevitable.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
I don’t have the link handy, but I believe some research paper is found that workers who think AI is saving them times say they think AI save them 20% of their time.
The research shows that it’s wasted 20%.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog C-suite execs were already bullshit generators. Of course a bullshit-generator machine would save them time.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog i imagine c-suite, who write and receive lots of boring emails that don't get read are saving a lot of time as much of what they do is non-essential to business.
Workers, however, who produce all the value of a company are not experiencing the same thing.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog What this actually shows, is that it’s the managers who are replaceable by chatbot, just saying!
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog love to see an option of lost time.
I have seen people use AI and then another person has to redo the work because the AI was wrong.
Total time save was negative 30 minutes.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog To be Fair... C suites sit and talk out their arse all day every day, so naturally they see AI as being a time saver, practically stealing their jobs.
-
C suites think GenAI is saving loads of time vs the actual workers, who don’t.
@GossiTheDog I’m old enough to remember all sorts of new tech that was going to make our jobs easier so we could do less bullshit time wasting work…like email, the net, etc. tl:dr, we now just have the same amount (or more) of different work
