Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
31 Beiträge 18 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

    We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

    There are important indicators of compulsive use of the app that TikTok has disregarded in its risk assessment.

    Key features of the addictive design:
    🔹Infinite scroll
    🔹Autoplay
    🔹Push notifications
    🔹Highly personalised recommender system

    We consider that TikTok needs to change the basic design of its service.

    TikTok can now exercise its right to examine and reply to the finding.

    https://link.europa.eu/9fTwmJ

    fanime@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    fanime@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    fanime@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #14

    @EUCommission Enough with international double standards, Instagram and TikTok are equally addictive, they just have different age groups. Enforce changes on both or none. Is there similar action towards Instagram?

    Congrats though, it's a step towards the right path 💫 and setting an example for other countries 🌍

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • tehpw@mstdn.socialT tehpw@mstdn.social

      @ikuturso @sam @EUCommission your guess is correct. most of the DSA applies only to platforms >45 million monthly active users: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Services_Act#Designation_of_VLOPs_and_VLOSEs So if the fediverse, including loops, actually stays federated, meaning not too many people use the same instance (or different instances run by the same operator), its structure makes it inherently exempt.

      sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sam@break3.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #15

      @tehpw@mstdn.social @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu @ikuturso@mastodon.social That is amazing, especially as if they are counting as only local users and not connected users through federation.

      tehpw@mstdn.socialT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

        @EUCommission OR join our #FOSS alternative called #Loops!

        https://vido.social/invite/a_019c0565-43b2-7142-a249-c4193ce9565dFNNtC5E

        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariarhythmic@ohai.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #16

        @stux @EUCommission I don't think we need short-video platforms at all

        The purpose of the very idea of a short video platform is to be addictive and detrimental to attention spans.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

          We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

          There are important indicators of compulsive use of the app that TikTok has disregarded in its risk assessment.

          Key features of the addictive design:
          🔹Infinite scroll
          🔹Autoplay
          🔹Push notifications
          🔹Highly personalised recommender system

          We consider that TikTok needs to change the basic design of its service.

          TikTok can now exercise its right to examine and reply to the finding.

          https://link.europa.eu/9fTwmJ

          hans@procolix.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hans@procolix.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hans@procolix.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #17

          @EUCommission Great, now give them a fine that really hurts.

          eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

            We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

            There are important indicators of compulsive use of the app that TikTok has disregarded in its risk assessment.

            Key features of the addictive design:
            🔹Infinite scroll
            🔹Autoplay
            🔹Push notifications
            🔹Highly personalised recommender system

            We consider that TikTok needs to change the basic design of its service.

            TikTok can now exercise its right to examine and reply to the finding.

            https://link.europa.eu/9fTwmJ

            albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
            albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
            albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #18

            @EUCommission

            "Kids between 12 and 15 spend 4 to 5 hours daily on Tiktok."

            140 million users in the European Union alone.

            Tiktok sure is an abomination but one must ask as well why parents and grandparents are so busy that they can't properly engage with their own kids. The cost of living crisis made of Tiktok a convenient child minder. Same with Youtube, on that regard.

            #Europe #EuropeanUnion #Tiktok

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

              We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

              There are important indicators of compulsive use of the app that TikTok has disregarded in its risk assessment.

              Key features of the addictive design:
              🔹Infinite scroll
              🔹Autoplay
              🔹Push notifications
              🔹Highly personalised recommender system

              We consider that TikTok needs to change the basic design of its service.

              TikTok can now exercise its right to examine and reply to the finding.

              https://link.europa.eu/9fTwmJ

              atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              atlovato@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              atlovato@mastodon.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #19

              @EUCommission - What an App to lose brain cells.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sam@break3.socialS sam@break3.social

                @tehpw@mstdn.social @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu @ikuturso@mastodon.social That is amazing, especially as if they are counting as only local users and not connected users through federation.

                tehpw@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tehpw@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tehpw@mstdn.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #20

                @sam @EUCommission @ikuturso I think adding all up would be hard to argue, because one instance operator doesn't have influence over the experience of other instances' users. (doesn't mean someone won't try and fail to make that argument at some point). I imagine the Commission would add up users if the same person or company runs multiple instances, which makes sense. Think: Meta opening multiple Threads instances, splitting the userbase & federating between them to avoid DSA rules.

                sam@break3.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                  @EUCommission OR join our #FOSS alternative called #Loops!

                  https://vido.social/invite/a_019c0565-43b2-7142-a249-c4193ce9565dFNNtC5E

                  athavariel@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                  athavariel@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                  athavariel@social.vivaldi.net
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #21

                  @EUCommission listen to this guy @stux

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                    We've preliminary found that TikTok is in breach of the DSA for its addictive design.

                    There are important indicators of compulsive use of the app that TikTok has disregarded in its risk assessment.

                    Key features of the addictive design:
                    🔹Infinite scroll
                    🔹Autoplay
                    🔹Push notifications
                    🔹Highly personalised recommender system

                    We consider that TikTok needs to change the basic design of its service.

                    TikTok can now exercise its right to examine and reply to the finding.

                    https://link.europa.eu/9fTwmJ

                    minfer@masto.esM This user is from outside of this forum
                    minfer@masto.esM This user is from outside of this forum
                    minfer@masto.es
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #22

                    @EUCommission I think that most apps fall in this same category. Not only social networks but even newspapers.

                    sam@break3.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • minfer@masto.esM minfer@masto.es

                      @EUCommission I think that most apps fall in this same category. Not only social networks but even newspapers.

                      sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sam@break3.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #23

                      @minfer@masto.es @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Knowing Search Engines do, most likely newspapers, blogs and more might get into that category to, unless it only counts when it's interaction on the website directly.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • tehpw@mstdn.socialT tehpw@mstdn.social

                        @sam @EUCommission @ikuturso I think adding all up would be hard to argue, because one instance operator doesn't have influence over the experience of other instances' users. (doesn't mean someone won't try and fail to make that argument at some point). I imagine the Commission would add up users if the same person or company runs multiple instances, which makes sense. Think: Meta opening multiple Threads instances, splitting the userbase & federating between them to avoid DSA rules.

                        sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sam@break3.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sam@break3.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #24

                        @tehpw@mstdn.social @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu @ikuturso@mastodon.social Tbh if Threads done that, it would make it a lot better of a push for full federation between the rest of things as I think they are still on a strange partial federation.

                        tehpw@mstdn.socialT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • grob@mstdn.socialG grob@mstdn.social

                          @EUCommission I can't help the feeling the EU is finally waking up and prepared to throw its weight around.

                          eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #25

                          Hi there, @grob!
                          The DSA has been in force since November 2022, and fully applicable since February 2024. Since then we have launched many investigations, made companies comply to our rules, and fined some.
                          You can find a comprehensive overview of other companies we are supervising here: https://link.europa.eu/ngkJPH

                          grob@mstdn.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • axeln@norden.socialA axeln@norden.social

                            @EUCommission Thank you. Next up: Insta.

                            eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #26

                            Hello @axeln, META also falls under the category of "Very Large Online Platforms", which we supervise.
                            You can find an overview of all ongoing investigations for all these large companies here:
                            https://link.europa.eu/ngkJPH

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • jonben@social.spejset.orgJ jonben@social.spejset.org

                              @EUCommission Please save us some taxpayer Euros and just ban the blasted thing! 😉

                              thatonewalnut@mastodon.nlT This user is from outside of this forum
                              thatonewalnut@mastodon.nlT This user is from outside of this forum
                              thatonewalnut@mastodon.nl
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #27

                              @jonben @EUCommission

                              Do you know how a fine works? Tiktok has to PAY US up to 6%, not the other way around lol

                              Jokes aside, it deserves a ban, but Gen Alpha would riot

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • hans@procolix.socialH hans@procolix.social

                                @EUCommission Great, now give them a fine that really hurts.

                                eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #28

                                Hello @hans! First, TikTok now as the right to a written defence. After this, if a breach of the DSA is established, a fine can indeed be a consequence.
                                In a recent example, the company X was fined €120 million for breaching transparency obligations, including deceptive design practices and lack of transparency in its advertising repository.
                                You can learn more about how enforcement proceedings work here: https://link.europa.eu/3kC9Vg

                                hans@procolix.socialH 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • sam@break3.socialS sam@break3.social

                                  @tehpw@mstdn.social @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu @ikuturso@mastodon.social Tbh if Threads done that, it would make it a lot better of a push for full federation between the rest of things as I think they are still on a strange partial federation.

                                  tehpw@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tehpw@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tehpw@mstdn.social
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #29

                                  @sam @EUCommission @ikuturso
                                  If it were clear to the userbase that they were on different instances, maybe 😉

                                  Threads does federate with other ActivityPub services afaik. I followed some Threads accounts when it first opened. It's just de-facto unfederated now cause many large non-corporate instances have since blocked them. I understand why. Meta has unceremoniously scrapped open protocols before (Facebook messenger had XMPP when it first started). So their commitment is unreliable at best.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                                    Hello @hans! First, TikTok now as the right to a written defence. After this, if a breach of the DSA is established, a fine can indeed be a consequence.
                                    In a recent example, the company X was fined €120 million for breaching transparency obligations, including deceptive design practices and lack of transparency in its advertising repository.
                                    You can learn more about how enforcement proceedings work here: https://link.europa.eu/3kC9Vg

                                    hans@procolix.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    hans@procolix.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    hans@procolix.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #30

                                    @EUCommission Thanks for the reaction 👍️

                                    The €120 million for X doesn't mean a lot, that doesn't hurt. Small price to pay for spreading desinformation and influencing European elections. Eloon would pay that with a big smile on his face.

                                    A fine of 6% of the annual global revenue would hurt, that's the type of fine that sends the message "we're serious".

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.euE eucommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu

                                      Hi there, @grob!
                                      The DSA has been in force since November 2022, and fully applicable since February 2024. Since then we have launched many investigations, made companies comply to our rules, and fined some.
                                      You can find a comprehensive overview of other companies we are supervising here: https://link.europa.eu/ngkJPH

                                      grob@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      grob@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      grob@mstdn.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #31

                                      @EUCommission 💪 keep it up! Rule of law is what I'm here for 🇪🇺

                                      But please do not make client side scanning in any way part of that law. It is so dangerous! Imagine an autocracy had that kind of access to its citizens' data and thought.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                                      Antworten
                                      • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                      Anmelden zum Antworten
                                      • Älteste zuerst
                                      • Neuste zuerst
                                      • Meiste Stimmen



                                      Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                      Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                      Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                      • Anmelden

                                      • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                      • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                      • Erster Beitrag
                                        Letzter Beitrag
                                      0
                                      • Home
                                      • Aktuell
                                      • Tags
                                      • Über dieses Forum