Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.
C
phase 2 is requiring everyone to use an approved vpn aka government "gateway".
because right now, you can access the internet via all kinds of entry pints - from your broadband at home, to your 4G mobile, to the cafe wifi, etc and it makes it a little less convenient to surveil you.
much easier if all your traffic goes through the approved ID-verifying gateway.
Addressing the embarrassing lack of diversity on Mastodon should also be a goal.
And no, asking white Europeans to attend lavish conferences in Germany to discuss isn't the solution.
We need better processes to hold biased admins/mods to account. Eg
* Mandatory transparency on account limiting, suspension and post removal
* GDPR compliance especially subject access requests
* Public statistics on compliance with the above, including timelinesss
* Referral to independent user-nominated moderators for adjudication with binding decisions
* Code of conduct which codifies the Jerusalem Declaration on #antisemitism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Declaration_on_Antisemitism
Go for it, it is all public information
Oh but the UKLFI have admitted they did it.
It's on their own website.
You need to grow up.
You seem like the person in the room who says "but Hitler was a vegetarian and loved animals".
You appear to demonstrate an immaturity, a naiveté, about the wider context that includes
1. A malevolent group, the UKLFI, pressuring British institutions to make changes in a way that they would not do. The same group that forced a London hospital to be take down childrens art.
2. The ramping up of the genocide of Palestine, its people, culture, its history, its very memory.
1/2
I will be writing to the Museum.
I hope others will too.
It isn't the most effective action, but for many it is feasible, and it will let them know that this won't slide without us knowing their complicity.
The UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) according to this report.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/british-museum-palestine-middle-east-displays-b1271100.html
They also had the children's art removed from a London hospital.
its on their own website they're proud of it
https://www.uklfi.com/hospital-removes-gaza-artwork-from-hospital-corridor
indeed, some billionaires are demanding every user on the internet is never anonymous
""the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online""
oh ok.
I would urge readers not to have blind faith in things like Signal or Tor.
This is from 2013, over a decade ago, they've advanced since:
"The National Security Agency (“NSA”) has developed techniques to circumvent the anonymity offered by the Tor network. "
src: https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/snowden-documents-reveal-nsa-attempts-to-track-tor-users
what is 'clearnet" ?
I'm no expert but we do check age when selling alcohol, vapes or knives in shops.
In a shop the vendor looks at the photo ID (eg student card, driving license, other) but does not keep it.
That seems to be a proportionate approach.
Sadly I don't know of anything equivalent in the digital world.
Does the "maybe" depend on instance size? or reach?
Thinking aloud - it can't be instance size because you can theoretically reach people beyond your instance.
I think age verification is a good thing. If it can be done in a privacy preserving way - and that, for me, is the issue.