Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1,000,000+ people on Pixelfed.

1,000,000+ people on Pixelfed.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
pixelfedonemillionstrongforeverfederated
29 Beiträge 12 Kommentatoren 4 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

    @wendinoakland @pixelfed A more accurate term for biased/manipulative algorithms is probably "biased/manipulative algorithms". While knowing that "algorithms" _can_ have less obvious side effects, it is important to "colloquially" point out that those are a subset of algorithms. I've yet to find a better term myself.

    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
    wendinoakland@beige.party
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #21

    @tux0r @pixelfed Or strictly chronological

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

      @tux0r @pixelfed Independent/unmanipulated…

      tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
      tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
      tux0r@layer8.space
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #22

      @wendinoakland @pixelfed Given that algorithms are usually man-made "rule sets" which are designed for a certain program flow, I'd argue that there are no "independent" or "neutral" algorithms.

      wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

        @wendinoakland @pixelfed Given that algorithms are usually man-made "rule sets" which are designed for a certain program flow, I'd argue that there are no "independent" or "neutral" algorithms.

        wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
        wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
        wendinoakland@beige.party
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #23

        @tux0r @pixelfed Anything we touch, indeed, but there are ways to successfully protect ourselves from some built in bias.

        tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

          @tux0r @pixelfed Anything we touch, indeed, but there are ways to successfully protect ourselves from some built in bias.

          tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
          tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
          tux0r@layer8.space
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #24

          @wendinoakland @pixelfed Chronology is biased as well. What if a random user does NOT want a chronological timeline and would prefer a "for you" feed, filled with whoever pays best?

          wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

            @wendinoakland @pixelfed Chronology is biased as well. What if a random user does NOT want a chronological timeline and would prefer a "for you" feed, filled with whoever pays best?

            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.party
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #25

            @tux0r @pixelfed Pays them? Satisfies their dopamine needs? Hello, tiktok!

            tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

              @tux0r @pixelfed Pays them? Satisfies their dopamine needs? Hello, tiktok!

              tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
              tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
              tux0r@layer8.space
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #26

              @wendinoakland @pixelfed Precisely. TikTok would not be anywhere close to its current popularity if they would just have a chronological timeline. There are no "objectively good" algorithms.

              wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                @wendinoakland @pixelfed Precisely. TikTok would not be anywhere close to its current popularity if they would just have a chronological timeline. There are no "objectively good" algorithms.

                wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                wendinoakland@beige.party
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #27

                @tux0r @pixelfed I guess that’s part of the self-filtering of mastodon/fediverse users. A particular taste for curating information, finding familars and needing a modicum of technical capability.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                  @Brask @pixelfed Mine is default black. Can’t you do that in your settings?

                  brask@expressional.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brask@expressional.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brask@expressional.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #28

                  @wendinoakland @pixelfed Yes I have set it to black, but that is not default. Try to log out and delete cookies or use an other device where you are not loged in, then you can see that whit is default.

                  wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • brask@expressional.socialB brask@expressional.social

                    @wendinoakland @pixelfed Yes I have set it to black, but that is not default. Try to log out and delete cookies or use an other device where you are not loged in, then you can see that whit is default.

                    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wendinoakland@beige.party
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #29

                    @Brask @pixelfed Oh, eew. Hopefully they’ll get to that as an internal settings option.

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • crossgolf_rebel@moppels.barC crossgolf_rebel@moppels.bar shared this topic
                      energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                    Antworten
                    • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                    Anmelden zum Antworten
                    • Älteste zuerst
                    • Neuste zuerst
                    • Meiste Stimmen



                    Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                    Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                    Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                    • Anmelden

                    • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                    • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                    • Erster Beitrag
                      Letzter Beitrag
                    0
                    • Home
                    • Aktuell
                    • Tags
                    • Über dieses Forum