Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1,000,000+ people on Pixelfed.

1,000,000+ people on Pixelfed.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
pixelfedonemillionstrongforeverfederated
29 Beiträge 12 Kommentatoren 4 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

    @pixelfed No adverts
    No influencers
    No algos
    No surveillance!
    #pixelfed

    tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
    tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
    tux0r@layer8.space
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #14

    @wendinoakland @pixelfed All software is "algos". Precise language is important.

    wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

      @wendinoakland @pixelfed All software is "algos". Precise language is important.

      wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
      wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
      wendinoakland@beige.party
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #15

      @tux0r @pixelfed Colloquial vs technical usage

      tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

        @tux0r @pixelfed Colloquial vs technical usage

        tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
        tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
        tux0r@layer8.space
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #16

        @wendinoakland @pixelfed I think it's a massive problem that, after prolonged scaremongering across all media channels, "algorithms" are now misunderstood in common parlance as being "something bad". How are we supposed to help people achieve greater digital literacy when basic technical concepts are reinterpreted in such a tabloid fashion?

        wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • jakobnitschke@mastodon.socialJ jakobnitschke@mastodon.social

          @pixelfed amazing news! Do you have a guide though about how to find the right content? I really struggle to find content there.

          kaffeeringe@social.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaffeeringe@social.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaffeeringe@social.tchncs.de
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #17

          @JakobNitschke Follow Hashtags, mute Accounts that don't really share photos.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

            @wendinoakland @pixelfed I think it's a massive problem that, after prolonged scaremongering across all media channels, "algorithms" are now misunderstood in common parlance as being "something bad". How are we supposed to help people achieve greater digital literacy when basic technical concepts are reinterpreted in such a tabloid fashion?

            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.party
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #18

            @tux0r @pixelfed Excellent point, and knowing now that an algorithm is, essentially, a set of rules, it’s unfortunate that the word’s been coopted by the masses to indicate corporate complicity or involuntary influencing when there’s probably another more accurate term. Language is complicated.

            tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

              @tux0r @pixelfed Excellent point, and knowing now that an algorithm is, essentially, a set of rules, it’s unfortunate that the word’s been coopted by the masses to indicate corporate complicity or involuntary influencing when there’s probably another more accurate term. Language is complicated.

              tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
              tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
              tux0r@layer8.space
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #19

              @wendinoakland @pixelfed A more accurate term for biased/manipulative algorithms is probably "biased/manipulative algorithms". While knowing that "algorithms" _can_ have less obvious side effects, it is important to "colloquially" point out that those are a subset of algorithms. I've yet to find a better term myself.

              wendinoakland@beige.partyW 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                @wendinoakland @pixelfed A more accurate term for biased/manipulative algorithms is probably "biased/manipulative algorithms". While knowing that "algorithms" _can_ have less obvious side effects, it is important to "colloquially" point out that those are a subset of algorithms. I've yet to find a better term myself.

                wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                wendinoakland@beige.party
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #20

                @tux0r @pixelfed Independent/unmanipulated…

                tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                  @wendinoakland @pixelfed A more accurate term for biased/manipulative algorithms is probably "biased/manipulative algorithms". While knowing that "algorithms" _can_ have less obvious side effects, it is important to "colloquially" point out that those are a subset of algorithms. I've yet to find a better term myself.

                  wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wendinoakland@beige.party
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #21

                  @tux0r @pixelfed Or strictly chronological

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                    @tux0r @pixelfed Independent/unmanipulated…

                    tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tux0r@layer8.space
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #22

                    @wendinoakland @pixelfed Given that algorithms are usually man-made "rule sets" which are designed for a certain program flow, I'd argue that there are no "independent" or "neutral" algorithms.

                    wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                      @wendinoakland @pixelfed Given that algorithms are usually man-made "rule sets" which are designed for a certain program flow, I'd argue that there are no "independent" or "neutral" algorithms.

                      wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendinoakland@beige.party
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #23

                      @tux0r @pixelfed Anything we touch, indeed, but there are ways to successfully protect ourselves from some built in bias.

                      tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                        @tux0r @pixelfed Anything we touch, indeed, but there are ways to successfully protect ourselves from some built in bias.

                        tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tux0r@layer8.space
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #24

                        @wendinoakland @pixelfed Chronology is biased as well. What if a random user does NOT want a chronological timeline and would prefer a "for you" feed, filled with whoever pays best?

                        wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                          @wendinoakland @pixelfed Chronology is biased as well. What if a random user does NOT want a chronological timeline and would prefer a "for you" feed, filled with whoever pays best?

                          wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wendinoakland@beige.party
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #25

                          @tux0r @pixelfed Pays them? Satisfies their dopamine needs? Hello, tiktok!

                          tux0r@layer8.spaceT 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                            @tux0r @pixelfed Pays them? Satisfies their dopamine needs? Hello, tiktok!

                            tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tux0r@layer8.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tux0r@layer8.space
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #26

                            @wendinoakland @pixelfed Precisely. TikTok would not be anywhere close to its current popularity if they would just have a chronological timeline. There are no "objectively good" algorithms.

                            wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • tux0r@layer8.spaceT tux0r@layer8.space

                              @wendinoakland @pixelfed Precisely. TikTok would not be anywhere close to its current popularity if they would just have a chronological timeline. There are no "objectively good" algorithms.

                              wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wendinoakland@beige.party
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #27

                              @tux0r @pixelfed I guess that’s part of the self-filtering of mastodon/fediverse users. A particular taste for curating information, finding familars and needing a modicum of technical capability.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                                @Brask @pixelfed Mine is default black. Can’t you do that in your settings?

                                brask@expressional.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brask@expressional.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brask@expressional.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #28

                                @wendinoakland @pixelfed Yes I have set it to black, but that is not default. Try to log out and delete cookies or use an other device where you are not loged in, then you can see that whit is default.

                                wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • brask@expressional.socialB brask@expressional.social

                                  @wendinoakland @pixelfed Yes I have set it to black, but that is not default. Try to log out and delete cookies or use an other device where you are not loged in, then you can see that whit is default.

                                  wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  wendinoakland@beige.party
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #29

                                  @Brask @pixelfed Oh, eew. Hopefully they’ll get to that as an internal settings option.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • crossgolf_rebel@moppels.barC crossgolf_rebel@moppels.bar shared this topic
                                    energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                                  Antworten
                                  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                  Anmelden zum Antworten
                                  • Älteste zuerst
                                  • Neuste zuerst
                                  • Meiste Stimmen



                                  Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                  Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                  Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                  • Anmelden

                                  • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                  • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                  • Erster Beitrag
                                    Letzter Beitrag
                                  0
                                  • Home
                                  • Aktuell
                                  • Tags
                                  • Über dieses Forum