hot take: it's better and easier to write blog pages in rss than in html.
-
hot take: it's better and easier to write blog pages in rss than in html.
in rss format is very friendly to posting text and simple which you can style (not a joke), while html is a ton of tags. rss is literally styled gemini for http. right?
what do you guys think of blogs which are entirely based on rss?@hacknorris isn't RSS an XML?
-
@hacknorris isn't RSS an XML?
@wojtek yeeees
-
hot take: it's better and easier to write blog pages in rss than in html.
in rss format is very friendly to posting text and simple which you can style (not a joke), while html is a ton of tags. rss is literally styled gemini for http. right?
what do you guys think of blogs which are entirely based on rss?@hacknorris Firefox just downloads the file now when you click on a link to an RSS file (haven't tested widely or with other formats). If browsers showed the text, wouldn't need much/any formatting, that would help along your feed-as-blog dreams.
A plug-in might be a place to start?
-
@hacknorris Firefox just downloads the file now when you click on a link to an RSS file (haven't tested widely or with other formats). If browsers showed the text, wouldn't need much/any formatting, that would help along your feed-as-blog dreams.
A plug-in might be a place to start?
@slowenough try opening mine: https://hacknorris.sh1tbox.com/main.xml
-
@wojtek yeeees
@hacknorris @wojtek As is Atom, and RSS 1.0. With the rise of JSON we now also have JSON Feed, which is not XML. (insert relevant xkcd comic here)
Feed-bloggers can develop friendly rivalries based on which format they hard-code their blogs in.
-
@hacknorris @wojtek As is Atom, and RSS 1.0. With the rise of JSON we now also have JSON Feed, which is not XML. (insert relevant xkcd comic here)
Feed-bloggers can develop friendly rivalries based on which format they hard-code their blogs in.
-
hot take: it's better and easier to write blog pages in rss than in html.
in rss format is very friendly to posting text and simple which you can style (not a joke), while html is a ton of tags. rss is literally styled gemini for http. right?
what do you guys think of blogs which are entirely based on rss? -
@slowenough try opening mine: https://hacknorris.sh1tbox.com/main.xml
@hacknorris Niiice. Never got into XML, didn't know about that doctype trick. Which fyi, you misspelled "hmlt" in the comment.
If you have a little write-up about doing this I will gladly spread it around, it's a fun idea. Just the .xsl and .css files, besides the .xml?
(Heh I would doubt anyone's extended JSON to be able to do this, but it does have a lot of users, so who knows?)
-
@hacknorris Niiice. Never got into XML, didn't know about that doctype trick. Which fyi, you misspelled "hmlt" in the comment.
If you have a little write-up about doing this I will gladly spread it around, it's a fun idea. Just the .xsl and .css files, besides the .xml?
(Heh I would doubt anyone's extended JSON to be able to do this, but it does have a lot of users, so who knows?)
@slowenough you can actually use only css, like here i did: https://github.com/hacknorris-code/text-markup/blob/main/index.xml
-
hot take: it's better and easier to write blog pages in rss than in html.
in rss format is very friendly to posting text and simple which you can style (not a joke), while html is a ton of tags. rss is literally styled gemini for http. right?
what do you guys think of blogs which are entirely based on rss?Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!
