Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
profsamlecturetour
39 Beiträge 28 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • K kitkat_blue@mastodon.social

    @sundogplanets

    is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

    Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #27

    @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

    K 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

      thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thejacenallen@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #28

      @sundogplanets oh yeah the math. No way. I would never attempt this myself.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

        K This user is from outside of this forum
        K This user is from outside of this forum
        kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #29

        @sundogplanets

        Tyvm!

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

          K This user is from outside of this forum
          K This user is from outside of this forum
          kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #30

          @sundogplanets

          So, "yearly excess of more than 640% above natural (meteorite contribution) levels" plus "a noticeable delay (~30 years) between the beginning of the injection process when orbiting bodies are decommissioned and the eventual ozone-depletion consequences in the stratosphere." seems to add up to a potential ticking time bomb for the ozone layer. 😰

          Other than saying "significant" they don't attempt to quantify the impact...i'd be curious as to what that might be.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

            There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

            1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #31

            Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

            There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

            #ProfSamLectureTour

            austinross@social.lolA joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ europlus@social.europlus.zoneE qccechris@mastodon.socialQ 5 Antworten Letzte Antwort
            1
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

              There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

              #ProfSamLectureTour

              austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
              austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
              austinross@social.lol
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #32

              @sundogplanets Will future generations be able to see the stars? Can we decommission these satellites? Or are we turning the sky into another landfill?

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                #ProfSamLectureTour

                joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
                joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
                joshsutphin@wandering.shop
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #33

                @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                laukidh@infosec.exchangeL cy@fedicy.us.toC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                  twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  twipped@twipped.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #34

                  @sundogplanets @olivia thats a lot of rocket fuel

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ joshsutphin@wandering.shop

                    @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    laukidh@infosec.exchange
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #35

                    @joshsutphin @sundogplanets they do frequent launches from each coast that deploy about two dozen satellites.

                    You can see the upcoming/completed launches to get a sense for HOW frequent. All the ones that say “Starlink mission” https://www.spacex.com/launches

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ joshsutphin@wandering.shop

                      @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cy@fedicy.us.to
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #36
                      Uh, yes. Feel free to start bombing them. The USA sure isn't gonna.

                      CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                        There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                        #ProfSamLectureTour

                        europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                        europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                        europlus@social.europlus.zone
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #37

                        @sundogplanets 🫂

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                          There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                          #ProfSamLectureTour

                          qccechris@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          qccechris@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          qccechris@mastodon.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #38

                          @sundogplanets Money beats people nearly everytime.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                            There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                            #ProfSamLectureTour

                            qccechris@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            qccechris@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                            qccechris@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #39

                            @sundogplanets

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • arbeitstitel@nrw.socialA arbeitstitel@nrw.social shared this topic
                            Antworten
                            • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                            Anmelden zum Antworten
                            • Älteste zuerst
                            • Neuste zuerst
                            • Meiste Stimmen



                            Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                            Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                            Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                            • Anmelden

                            • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                            • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                            • Erster Beitrag
                              Letzter Beitrag
                            0
                            • Home
                            • Aktuell
                            • Tags
                            • Über dieses Forum