Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
profsamlecturetour
39 Beiträge 28 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

    dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dockwalk@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #17

    @sundogplanets
    is there a map?

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

      bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bojanlandekic@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #18

      @sundogplanets scene in a netflix scifi movie: why are the stars following me? Those arent stars those are drones and satepites...run!!!

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

        K This user is from outside of this forum
        K This user is from outside of this forum
        kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #19

        @sundogplanets

        is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

        Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

          newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
          newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
          newstik@social.heise.de
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #20

          @sundogplanets Blue Origin announced TeraWave today.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

            @sundogplanets

            Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

            Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

            growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
            growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
            growthhexis@theforkiverse.com
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #21

            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets this sounds like a business opportunity - satellite safety and recycling co. #darkhumor

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

              There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

              1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #22

              @sundogplanets 🤬☹️

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                nead@social.vivaldi.net
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #23

                @sundogplanets Keep fighting the good fight, Professor. We need someone to give us accurate information we can rely on.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                  thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #24

                  @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT thejacenallen@mastodon.social

                    @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #25

                    @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                    crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                      crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crazypedia@mypocketpals.online
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #26

                      @sundogplanets@mastodon.social @thejacenallen@mastodon.social and dont swear when there's a big launch between updates and presentation 😅

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • K kitkat_blue@mastodon.social

                        @sundogplanets

                        is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

                        Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #27

                        @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                        K 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                          thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #28

                          @sundogplanets oh yeah the math. No way. I would never attempt this myself.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #29

                            @sundogplanets

                            Tyvm!

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #30

                              @sundogplanets

                              So, "yearly excess of more than 640% above natural (meteorite contribution) levels" plus "a noticeable delay (~30 years) between the beginning of the injection process when orbiting bodies are decommissioned and the eventual ozone-depletion consequences in the stratosphere." seems to add up to a potential ticking time bomb for the ozone layer. 😰

                              Other than saying "significant" they don't attempt to quantify the impact...i'd be curious as to what that might be.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #31

                                Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                                There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                                #ProfSamLectureTour

                                austinross@social.lolA joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ europlus@social.europlus.zoneE qccechris@mastodon.socialQ 5 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                1
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                                  There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                                  #ProfSamLectureTour

                                  austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  austinross@social.lol
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #32

                                  @sundogplanets Will future generations be able to see the stars? Can we decommission these satellites? Or are we turning the sky into another landfill?

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                                    There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                                    #ProfSamLectureTour

                                    joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    joshsutphin@wandering.shop
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #33

                                    @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL cy@fedicy.us.toC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                      twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      twipped@twipped.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      twipped@twipped.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #34

                                      @sundogplanets @olivia thats a lot of rocket fuel

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ joshsutphin@wandering.shop

                                        @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                                        laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        laukidh@infosec.exchange
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #35

                                        @joshsutphin @sundogplanets they do frequent launches from each coast that deploy about two dozen satellites.

                                        You can see the upcoming/completed launches to get a sense for HOW frequent. All the ones that say “Starlink mission” https://www.spacex.com/launches

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • joshsutphin@wandering.shopJ joshsutphin@wandering.shop

                                          @sundogplanets How are they doing this this fast? Are there like daily rocket launches and multi-satellite deployments per launch? I feel like this should be a way bigger deal?!

                                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cy@fedicy.us.to
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #36
                                          Uh, yes. Feel free to start bombing them. The USA sure isn't gonna.

                                          CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum