Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Aside from the war crime of attacking survivors of a shipwreck, we must now add the war crime of perfidy.

Aside from the war crime of attacking survivors of a shipwreck, we must now add the war crime of perfidy.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
3 Beiträge 2 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #1

    Aside from the war crime of attacking survivors of a shipwreck, we must now add the war crime of perfidy.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/us/politics/us-boat-attacks-law.html?unlocked_article_code=1.EFA.7xgP.qIPINOLUNg8W [gift link]

    Perfidy is considered a serious crime in war because, among other things, using civilian cover for offensive missions casts suspicion on all civilians in the theatre, putting non-combatants at risk.

    fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      Aside from the war crime of attacking survivors of a shipwreck, we must now add the war crime of perfidy.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/us/politics/us-boat-attacks-law.html?unlocked_article_code=1.EFA.7xgP.qIPINOLUNg8W [gift link]

      Perfidy is considered a serious crime in war because, among other things, using civilian cover for offensive missions casts suspicion on all civilians in the theatre, putting non-combatants at risk.

      fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
      fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
      fedithing@social.chinwag.org
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #2

      @mattblaze

      Where is this spin coming from that any of these were war crimes?

      Surely all these strikes were simply mass murders?

      -There was no war going on
      -The boats were civilian
      -The people on the boats were civilian
      -They were in international waters
      -They presented no threat to anyone
      -There has been no evidence presented against any of the murdered people
      -All of the survivors who were arrested by US forces were quickly released without charge (strongly suggesting no sealed evidence)

      ...why are people focusing on these edge cases as if the other strikes were legitimate?

      *ALL* of these strikes were murders, not just some.

      fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      1
      0
      • fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF fedithing@social.chinwag.org

        @mattblaze

        Where is this spin coming from that any of these were war crimes?

        Surely all these strikes were simply mass murders?

        -There was no war going on
        -The boats were civilian
        -The people on the boats were civilian
        -They were in international waters
        -They presented no threat to anyone
        -There has been no evidence presented against any of the murdered people
        -All of the survivors who were arrested by US forces were quickly released without charge (strongly suggesting no sealed evidence)

        ...why are people focusing on these edge cases as if the other strikes were legitimate?

        *ALL* of these strikes were murders, not just some.

        fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fedithing@social.chinwag.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
        fedithing@social.chinwag.org
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #3

        @mattblaze

        p.s. Almost makes one wonder if this "was it a war crime?" spin is coming from the White House itself. Casting it as an act of war lets them off the hook for the strikes and turns Hegseth into a scapegoat, protecting Trump.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        1
        0
        • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
        Antworten
        • In einem neuen Thema antworten
        Anmelden zum Antworten
        • Älteste zuerst
        • Neuste zuerst
        • Meiste Stimmen



        Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

        Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

        Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

        • Anmelden

        • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

        • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
        • Erster Beitrag
          Letzter Beitrag
        0
        • Home
        • Aktuell
        • Tags
        • Über dieses Forum