Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
79 Beiträge 57 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #66

    @sundogplanets

    Well, yeah, the idea of just you know oh we’re going to now reach this science fiction milestone because reasons.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • w6kme@mastodon.radioW w6kme@mastodon.radio

      @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #67

      @W6KME @sundogplanets

      Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

      w6kme@mastodon.radioW clintruin@mastodon.socialC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jplebreton@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #68

        @sundogplanets the performance of total seriousness, no matter how absurd the goal, is critical to tech oligarchs' "fake it til you rule the world" strategy. it rarely survives contact with reality but the damage it does is of course very real.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #69

          @sundogplanets Sounds like they used AI to generate this. The Kardashev scale is a classification of _civilization_, not "situation". I see this sort of auto-correct in lots of AI slop.

          Recent news articles kept referring to Tom Human as the Border Guard.

          If this wasn't so serious, I'd laugh.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

            @W6KME @sundogplanets

            Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
            w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
            w6kme@mastodon.radio
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #70

            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets SpaceX's unwillingness to be good citizens, and the US government's unwillingness to do anything about it...people are going to die eventually, and possibly a lot of them.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #71

              @sundogplanets

              What people should suggest is that Elon Musk personally move himself into space to oversee the development of his glorious satellite network.

              By all means, we should hurry him to the asteroid belt personally so he can collect the raw materials and then fashion the satellites. Tell him it will cut launch cost costs.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                tad@fedi.sndr.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                tad@fedi.sndr.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
                tad@fedi.sndr.uk
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #72

                @sundogplanets Musk: Hahaha Kessler go brrr

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                  @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

                  At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #73

                  @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets

                  A rail gun is completely unnecessary. As a scientist pointed out back in the good old Ronnie Reagan, Star Wars days. The way you defeat a network of satellites is to throw a bucket of sand into the right orbit.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                    @W6KME @sundogplanets

                    Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                    clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    clintruin@mastodon.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #74

                    @GhostOnTheHalfShell @W6KME @sundogplanets
                    Let's remember who we're talking about here...
                    ☠️
                    https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/115989156933538439

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                      Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                      benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benjaminklein@mastodon.nu
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #75

                      @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social brilliant book and well worth the read. Every time I hear someone mentioning one of these tech bros being intelligent I want a copy to throw at their head. Maybe we need to start explaining to politicians that if LEO is a shooting gallery it means no more GPS, do they remember what it was like navigating the world with paper maps, because we are going back there.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafeT teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafe
                        I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

                        IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #76

                        @teajaygrey @sundogplanets the cost of the fibre link is not mainly about the physical cable. The thing that takes time and money is getting permits for digging up roads, access through private fields, planning permission for connection points, and so on. And each new route of cable has to have this sorted from scratch, and some public authorities are slow, obstructive or just downright awkward.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #77

                          @sundogplanets I’m (jokingly) pretty sure aliens are behind this stupidity. Why else would we be purposely stranding ourselves on this planet by filling up the sky with space junk?

                          Oh right, because we can…

                          Times like these I like to disassociate much more hilarious reasons than what reality actually offers, as to why things they way they are. Today it’s aliens, tomorrow? Tardigrades maybe.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                            netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netraven@hear-me.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #78

                            @sundogplanets god damn cardassians!!!!! /s

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • jakebrake@ohai.socialJ jakebrake@ohai.social

                              @sundogplanets

                              Bezos: Oh yeah? Well AWS will put TWO million data centers in orbit!

                              China: Let 5 million space data centers bloom!

                              Musk: Well, then SpaceX will put TEN million centers in orbit!

                              Bezos: Fine! ELEVENTY million AWS centers!

                              Musk: Hah! TWELVETY million SpaceX centers! Each with a cool robot!

                              Bezos: Meh-meh-meh-robot-meh. Amazon has robots.

                              Musk: But not COOL robots.

                              m0khr@mastodon.radioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              m0khr@mastodon.radioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              m0khr@mastodon.radio
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #79

                              @jakebrake @sundogplanets
                              Cool 'robots' that are just remote waldos...

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • vogelspur@troet.cafeV vogelspur@troet.cafe shared this topic
                              Antworten
                              • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                              Anmelden zum Antworten
                              • Älteste zuerst
                              • Neuste zuerst
                              • Meiste Stimmen



                              Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                              Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                              Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                              • Anmelden

                              • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                              • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                              • Erster Beitrag
                                Letzter Beitrag
                              0
                              • Home
                              • Aktuell
                              • Tags
                              • Über dieses Forum