https://stoat.chat/ Stoat is "discord but FOSS".
-
@Saorsa "I dislike this open-source project but I can't give any reason why" ok
-
@crypticcelery it is in progress and on their roadmap https://op.stoatinternal.com/projects/all-of-revolt/gantt?query_id=53
@konstruct ah, good to know, did not know that, only went by current feature set. I hope they do it soon…
-
https://stoat.chat/ Stoat is "discord but FOSS". Has apps for all platforms. Self-hostable.
https://zulip.com/ zulip is kind of like "discord but FOSS". Originally meant for work teams, it has topic-based conversation threads for asynchronous messaging. Self-hostable. Uses either jitsi meet, zoom or bigbluebutton protocols for calls (hoster's choice). Has apps for all platforms. Features: https://zulip.com/features/
https://chitchatter.im/ chitchatter is an ephemeral chat web app. It is lightweight and embeddable, doesn't require signing up, does video/audio calls and text/media chat. The web app is self-hostable. It's purely peer to peer, so it cannot store messages for asynchronous communication unless you leave the app running. You create a channel, share its URL (and password if it is private), and keep it open to catch messages sent to it.
https://docs.spacebar.chat/#what-is-spacebar Spacebar is a self-hosted alternative to discord's back-end. It aims to be a drop-in replacement that should be compatible with discord clients and bots that were only made with the discord API in mind, e.g. Dissent ( https://github.com/diamondburned/dissent ). It is explicitly compatible with the https://fermi.chat/ web client too, if others don't work as well, since it is still in development.
Boosts greatly encouraged, let's help people make an informed choice!
#FOSS #Discord #ageverification #privacy #boycott@konstruct Do any of these support dedicated voice chat channels? Anything without is not a proper alternative and will only lead to disappointed people.
-
W wando@troet.cafe shared this topic
