We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
-
3) BoP is collecting and distributing funds (JP Morgan playing as banker) but this must be in violation of Know-Your-Customer laws since BoP *doesn't exist*. It is a transnational mafia backed only by the executive power of its members.
4) Since BoP doesn't exist, USPTO is illegally holding its trademarks on its behalf, violating the Lanham Act, which requires that holders intend to use marks in commerce.
5) Trump signed Executive Order 14375 protecting BoP under the International Organizations Immunity Act, but this merely protects from interference
-
5) Trump signed Executive Order 14375 protecting BoP under the International Organizations Immunity Act, but this merely protects from interference
This thing needs to be challenged legally and practically. If it is not stopped it will quickly evolve into a world takeover mechanism, and indeed it is already usurping US sovereignty as well as sovereignty in Gaza and of participant countries.
Seriously, this is no joke and intervention is necessary NOW. The illegal trademarks are one pathway in. There are others. But whatever you do don't brush this off as one of Trump's follies. It's anything but.
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy Congress is worthless, should have impeached him 3 times ago
-
This thing needs to be challenged legally and practically. If it is not stopped it will quickly evolve into a world takeover mechanism, and indeed it is already usurping US sovereignty as well as sovereignty in Gaza and of participant countries.
Seriously, this is no joke and intervention is necessary NOW. The illegal trademarks are one pathway in. There are others. But whatever you do don't brush this off as one of Trump's follies. It's anything but.
@davetroy I am glad you posted this. I was just trying to explain this to a colleague as a gut feeling I had, and relating it to SCOTUS' tariff decision (related due to ensuing lawlessness). You have put better words and sense to my gut feelings.
There is only one reason to do things in Trumplandia. To benefit Trump.
-
@davetroy I am glad you posted this. I was just trying to explain this to a colleague as a gut feeling I had, and relating it to SCOTUS' tariff decision (related due to ensuing lawlessness). You have put better words and sense to my gut feelings.
There is only one reason to do things in Trumplandia. To benefit Trump.
@Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy With all the publicity and photo ops, it will not be hard for ICC in Hague to search for people to accuse for crimes against humanity
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy this board is one big joke. There is no board of peace. Just bunch of people with their own plan and business
-
3) BoP is collecting and distributing funds (JP Morgan playing as banker) but this must be in violation of Know-Your-Customer laws since BoP *doesn't exist*. It is a transnational mafia backed only by the executive power of its members.
4) Since BoP doesn't exist, USPTO is illegally holding its trademarks on its behalf, violating the Lanham Act, which requires that holders intend to use marks in commerce.
@davetroy
Who has the power to sue JP Morgan (or others) for violating KYC laws? If it's just the federal government there's not much to be done through that avenue, but if states or individuals can it would be interesting to see a company pay legally for going along with/supporting Trump's crimes. -
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy it shouldn't surprise anyone that it's just another rugpull in a long line of rugpulls since Trump was elected.
-
@Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy With all the publicity and photo ops, it will not be hard for ICC in Hague to search for people to accuse for crimes against humanity
@ashtime
ICC is toothless against US hegemony since the whole of Europe, including the ICC runs on US-owned payments systems.The US can just blacklist the ICC and payments providers/banks will jettison them faster than you can blink, as has already happened to judges working to prosecute Netanyahu's regime.
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy - you seem to go on an assumption that it has any meaning other than grift, corruption, and extortion.
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy@toad.social
1. There is no legal entity for terrorist organizations, but they're subject to every country's laws where their members are regardless.
2. See 1. -
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy - There is most definitely a law that enshrines it. It's the law of "fuck you, I'm winning."
This law transcends all political, geographic and cultural boundaries. It governs all people and all nations equally.Don't like it? Then take to the streets and be prepared to set up consequences for all conservatives. Not just the easily convictable ones.
Americans can keep hesitating or they can manifest politically. Even if it is a little economically inconvenient and socially awkward.
-
@davetroy I am glad you posted this. I was just trying to explain this to a colleague as a gut feeling I had, and relating it to SCOTUS' tariff decision (related due to ensuing lawlessness). You have put better words and sense to my gut feelings.
There is only one reason to do things in Trumplandia. To benefit Trump.
@Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy It is not the BoP, it is the BotPoS: the Board of the Piece of Shit.
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy serious question, can't we just ignore it?
-
We have a real problem brewing with the "Board of Peace" and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for "Board of Peace" organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country's laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to approve that.
@davetroy Have people not realised yet that this is just another grift by this man? Just like Trump University, Trump Steaks, his casinos, etc., etc.
-
@ashtime
ICC is toothless against US hegemony since the whole of Europe, including the ICC runs on US-owned payments systems.The US can just blacklist the ICC and payments providers/banks will jettison them faster than you can blink, as has already happened to judges working to prosecute Netanyahu's regime.
@joykill @ashtime @Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy We use Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) system in EU, which is totally separate. The funds will flow. They can block credit/debit cards, but it would be a suicide for the US payment owners. We already have different solutions that work (like Blik in Poland), and that would end in a quick ban of US systems and switching to EU based solutions. Example: Blik already achieved 50% payment versus 43% card usage in e-commerce and I can use it in every store.
-
@joykill @ashtime @Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy We use Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) system in EU, which is totally separate. The funds will flow. They can block credit/debit cards, but it would be a suicide for the US payment owners. We already have different solutions that work (like Blik in Poland), and that would end in a quick ban of US systems and switching to EU based solutions. Example: Blik already achieved 50% payment versus 43% card usage in e-commerce and I can use it in every store.
@zelgaav
Sure "funds will flow" from one bank to another, except you will need to personally go to your bank and retrieve cash directly from them, because none of your online payments/ATM cards will work.And while you can use some national payments systems as long as they have wide enough adoption, there are no international payments systems that span the whole of the EU, much less anywhere else in the world.
-
@zelgaav
Sure "funds will flow" from one bank to another, except you will need to personally go to your bank and retrieve cash directly from them, because none of your online payments/ATM cards will work.And while you can use some national payments systems as long as they have wide enough adoption, there are no international payments systems that span the whole of the EU, much less anywhere else in the world.
@zelgaav
Personally, I'm not sure how far the US needs to go before the EU switches away from US tech. There's a minor cultural shift going on now, but even then it's already backsliding at the higher levels, such as Germany going back to purchasing US-made fighter jets, talks of "sovereign cloud" infrastructure where the data centers are still on US soil, etc.In the end, there may come a unified EU online/card payments solution, but it will not be quick
-
@zelgaav
Sure "funds will flow" from one bank to another, except you will need to personally go to your bank and retrieve cash directly from them, because none of your online payments/ATM cards will work.And while you can use some national payments systems as long as they have wide enough adoption, there are no international payments systems that span the whole of the EU, much less anywhere else in the world.
@joykill @ashtime @Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy I can use Blik in every shop or ATM. Or I can send money to other persons directly, because sending money "to phone" also work.
-
@joykill @ashtime @Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy I can use Blik in every shop or ATM. Or I can send money to other persons directly, because sending money "to phone" also work.
@zelgaav
Okay, that's kind of cool. If you never leave Poland I guess you can manage without US payments. Wish we had anything like that in Lithuania, here everything is either Visa or Mastercard it seems.
