> Our analysis shows that AI-generated code is consistently more variable, more error-prone, and more likely to introduce high-severity issues without the right protections in place.
-
> Our analysis shows that AI-generated code is consistently more variable, more error-prone, and more likely to introduce high-severity issues without the right protections in place.
Note: Authored by an AI-PR-review company
Note: the solution proposed by the authors ends with "An AI code review tool could also help." xD
https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report
-
> Our analysis shows that AI-generated code is consistently more variable, more error-prone, and more likely to introduce high-severity issues without the right protections in place.
Note: Authored by an AI-PR-review company
Note: the solution proposed by the authors ends with "An AI code review tool could also help." xD
https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report
@nina_kali_nina more AI-generated code in FOSS codebases translates into more of that stuff in training sets. Models feeding on their outputs. We know how this ends and cleaning up the garbage will take forever.
-
S skorpy@chaos.social shared this topic