Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
10 Beiträge 8 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • zlabe@fediscience.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zlabe@fediscience.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zlabe@fediscience.org
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #1

    Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

    10 years ago December averaged about 402 ppm

    Data available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

    pl@mastodon.socialP jknodlseder@mastodon.socialJ faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF kplklink@mastodon.socialK 4 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    1
    0
    • zlabe@fediscience.orgZ zlabe@fediscience.org

      Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

      10 years ago December averaged about 402 ppm

      Data available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

      pl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pl@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #2

      @ZLabe omg 😭

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • zlabe@fediscience.orgZ zlabe@fediscience.org

        Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

        10 years ago December averaged about 402 ppm

        Data available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

        jknodlseder@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jknodlseder@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jknodlseder@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #3

        @ZLabe @Luke_Drury What strikes me most is that the second derivative of the long term trend is still positive, there is even not the hint of an inflection point 😬

        luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ieL not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • jknodlseder@mastodon.socialJ jknodlseder@mastodon.social

          @ZLabe @Luke_Drury What strikes me most is that the second derivative of the long term trend is still positive, there is even not the hint of an inflection point 😬

          luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ieL This user is from outside of this forum
          luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ieL This user is from outside of this forum
          luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ie
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #4

          @jknodlseder @ZLabe Yes sadly. And most people are totally unaware of this.

          lukeryanps@toot.communityL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ieL luke_drury@mastodon.dias.ie

            @jknodlseder @ZLabe Yes sadly. And most people are totally unaware of this.

            lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
            lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
            lukeryanps@toot.community
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #5

            @Luke_Drury @jknodlseder @ZLabe Do you think if people understood more about conditions during the Pliocene, the urgency would register? Or is it more of an empathy problem, not being able to associate one's actions with harm/benefit to future people?

            not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • zlabe@fediscience.orgZ zlabe@fediscience.org

              Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

              10 years ago December averaged about 402 ppm

              Data available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
              faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #6

              @ZLabe 😭 🤬

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • jknodlseder@mastodon.socialJ jknodlseder@mastodon.social

                @ZLabe @Luke_Drury What strikes me most is that the second derivative of the long term trend is still positive, there is even not the hint of an inflection point 😬

                not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                not_even_wrong@mastodon.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #7

                @jknodlseder @ZLabe @Luke_Drury The last 10 years look like linear growth to me. (who cares about the long term trend and for what?) The 2nd derivative for that period should be basically zero - except for 20/21 where we should even see a brief negative acceleration (followed by a quick fossil rebound). Linear growth is still (pretty) bad, but better than a continued acceleration ✌️

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • lukeryanps@toot.communityL lukeryanps@toot.community

                  @Luke_Drury @jknodlseder @ZLabe Do you think if people understood more about conditions during the Pliocene, the urgency would register? Or is it more of an empathy problem, not being able to associate one's actions with harm/benefit to future people?

                  not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  not_even_wrong@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #8

                  @lukeryanps @Luke_Drury @jknodlseder @ZLabe Almost all people know (there's not information shortage), but many western governments don't even want to stop fossil subsidies. All of them know exactly what to do, but refuse to go to work. I think it's safe to say that the vast majority of voters did not vote for the deconstruction of the ecosystem.

                  lukeryanps@toot.communityL 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • not_even_wrong@mastodon.socialN not_even_wrong@mastodon.social

                    @lukeryanps @Luke_Drury @jknodlseder @ZLabe Almost all people know (there's not information shortage), but many western governments don't even want to stop fossil subsidies. All of them know exactly what to do, but refuse to go to work. I think it's safe to say that the vast majority of voters did not vote for the deconstruction of the ecosystem.

                    lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lukeryanps@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lukeryanps@toot.community
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #9

                    @not_even_wrong @Luke_Drury @jknodlseder @ZLabe When I talk to people about trees within 300 miles of the South Pole and sea levels, you know, like 50 feet higher than now at 400ppm, 3 or 4 million years ago, they mostly don't seem to already know about that. Long-term cooperative effort may be the bigger hurdle? This is consistent with human history (tragedy of the commons). *We* will have to evolve (emotionally, socially) to deal with the now irreversible climate disaster, huh?

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • zlabe@fediscience.orgZ zlabe@fediscience.org

                      Carbon dioxide (CO₂) averaged about 427 ppm in December 2025

                      10 years ago December averaged about 402 ppm

                      Data available at https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

                      kplklink@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kplklink@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kplklink@mastodon.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #10

                      @ZLabe I did have lots to say in support. But, well yup. I edited myself. 😵‍💫

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                      Antworten
                      • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                      Anmelden zum Antworten
                      • Älteste zuerst
                      • Neuste zuerst
                      • Meiste Stimmen



                      Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                      Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                      Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                      • Anmelden

                      • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                      • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                      • Erster Beitrag
                        Letzter Beitrag
                      0
                      • Home
                      • Aktuell
                      • Tags
                      • Über dieses Forum