OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem all things being equal, yes.
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem I really think it would depend on how you define 'AI' and what your doing... E.g. in my scientific work I use quite a few tool that are now branded, at least by some, as 'AI'. This is categorically different from LLM slop generation or trying to replace graphic designers with a diffusion model. I care about ethics, honesty, and using appropriate tools for the job over what it's being branded as. Cutting the BS language would be great too, of course!
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem not surprised that there is a lot of "theoretical" sympathy. But do we - the people - have money and contacts to offer? I very much doubt it
-
@requiem Didn't vote but I would really carefully consider if you want to use this as a selling point to your prospective clients. First, they will care for your services and products quality, as long as it is created at least somewhat ethically, Second, "AI" as such is right on its peak in the hype cycle now, the useful parts will soon become just another tool in your workplace.
So I tend to vote "no", by lack of a "doesn't matter as long as I trust you"@jlapoutre @requiem it's as much a filter for the types of clients this putative agency wants to attract as it is a signal for clients.
Speaking for myself, I don't want to work with clients who think LLMs are a solution to anything.
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
-
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
I would love to get 1000 responses here, hint hint...
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem Where do I apply?
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
Not only would I want to hire you, I suspect that you'd be flooded by people who want to work for you as well.
Interesting side note, the replies provided a bonanza of bozos to block.
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
Absolutely.
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem No-brainer got me. (Voted yes.)
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem Probably. Though at this point I'd probably care more about what you thought 'AI' was, and whether you were not using what I thought you were not using.
-
@14mission Oh I agree that the term "AI" is the worst term ever. But I feel like "they" ruined the term so I used it only in the "ruined" sense of gargantuan Markov text generator thingy. Things like pattern recognition using neural networks is what I grew up with and I still think it has purpose. Alas even a plain old neural network needs to never be in direct control of an insulin pump or the rudder on a plane. Never. @requiem
@phf @14mission @requiem I don‘t get it. What have LLMs ruined? Traditional symbolic AI was in no way more AI than the currently trending AI flavor. Expert systems had/have their use. Classic NNs had/have their use. LLMs had/have their use. What exactly is the difference in your opinion (other than nobody pumped even a fraction of the money into expert systems than now into LLMs)
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem You can market yourself as “boutique consulting for software craftsmanship”
I feel like there are people willing to pay a premium for the quality of that over the mediocrity of AI generated code
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem From my experience, most people that want something built don't care about these details. If the software works, they don't care. If someone can do the same job with same guarantees but half the price, people will choose them.
The responses on fediverse will be very biased for this poll. If you seriously want to start such a business, I'll highly recommend doing some research from non-tech / business oriented people.
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
@requiem I'm not in any position to hire a tech consultancy, but especially for open source projects I would require it so that the project doesn't get IP contaminated
-
E energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
-
OK, so let's say me and some friends started a tech company/consultancy that refused to use "AI", would this encourage you choose us over others?
(boosts welcome)
-
0 0mega@sk.zehnvorne.social shared this topic
🧠