Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years.
-
@pafurijaz Half the point of #FOSS (or more than half, for a lot of people) is the "free as in beer" element. If they were willing to pay for things, they'd be in the Windows or Mac walled gardens. That's just the reality of the situation. Create a tool for everyone, and everyone will use it until they need to pay up.
@egoldblatt @pafurijaz it is "free as freedom" not free as free beer. You can have foss project that you need to pay for.
" Free software means that the users have the freedom to run, edit, contribute to, and share the software. Thus, free software is a matter of liberty, not price "
From : https://www.fsf.org/
So a FOSS software can still be a paid one
-
Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years. This is exactly one of those cases where an entire critical infrastructure is held together by the work of a single volunteer who apparently can’t find anyone willing to sponsor him for some financial support. #opensource #linux #foss #GNU
I think "father of time " (NTP) has a similar problem - the list could go on.
-
Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years. This is exactly one of those cases where an entire critical infrastructure is held together by the work of a single volunteer who apparently can’t find anyone willing to sponsor him for some financial support. #opensource #linux #foss #GNU
@pafurijaz But surely he can just "sudo sponsor my efforts" and all will be well? xkcd:149
-
Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years. This is exactly one of those cases where an entire critical infrastructure is held together by the work of a single volunteer who apparently can’t find anyone willing to sponsor him for some financial support. #opensource #linux #foss #GNU
@pafurijaz why didnt he use sudo to get funding?
-
@pafurijaz please exlain to us!
@martinosacchi @pafurijaz “sudo” is short for “superuser do”. It is a widely used system administration tool that lets you run commands with “superuser” privileges, so you can change and access pretty much any part of a system. For security, your account needs to be on a list and you need to enter a password to use it. If left unmaintained, bugs won’t be fixed or necessary changes made. This could result in security holes allowing systems to be compromised.
-
@crocodisle @rastilin @pafurijaz If there's an expectation of payment, then the software isn't free.
@egoldblatt @crocodisle @rastilin @pafurijaz
Whether or not a software is free (as in freedom) depends on the license. It has nothing to do with money. (And selling is even allowed under Free Software licenses.) Just because English has a hard time with words it doesn't mean that the meaning of "Free Software" changes. -
@rastilin @pafurijaz I don't see a likelihood of users or corporations being willing to pay for open source. If payment changes hands, that's a contract. And I'm sure that everyone wants a contract that protects them from anything that might go wrong.
@egoldblatt @rastilin @pafurijaz
Users and corporations are already paying for free software. It's just that the stack is just too large and they tend to only pay for end-products. (And not enough for those so that the depending projects get their fair share) Basically another case of "trickle down economy" not working and why we need more government based support for free software projects. -
@spacehobo @pafurijaz
You van install and use doas in Linux Debian.
It's great. I recommend it.
But, KDE Plasma depend to sudo, so at the end you have both.@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz
A desktop environment depends on sudo? So it doesn't work for regular/unprivileged users? -
@spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
That is an idiotic assumption on a networked multi user system.User needs an admin? Call tech support, admin handles it remotely via ssh.
If the desktop assumes sudo, that might just end up with the user getting to talk to HR and IT security.
-
@spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
That is an idiotic assumption on a networked multi user system.User needs an admin? Call tech support, admin handles it remotely via ssh.
If the desktop assumes sudo, that might just end up with the user getting to talk to HR and IT security.
@leeloo @spacehobo @pafurijaz
If the user isn't in sudo group, no problems. -
@leeloo @spacehobo @pafurijaz
If the user isn't in sudo group, no problems.@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz
How can you depend on sudo, but then not have problems when the user doesn't have permission to run sudo? -
@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz
How can you depend on sudo, but then not have problems when the user doesn't have permission to run sudo?@leeloo @spacehobo @pafurijaz
I prefer use doas.
But, if there is KDE, I must keep sudo, but I don't use it.
It's my personal computer.
Servers don't have desktop environments.In fact, I need the admin display challenge (that use sudo) when I change the theme for sddm, or lightm.
For people whis computer managed by me, they use doas because I teach them, if I think I can allow them to make some admin task.
-
@spacehobo @pafurijaz
You van install and use doas in Linux Debian.
It's great. I recommend it.
But, KDE Plasma depend to sudo, so at the end you have both.@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz theres also 'run0' in SystemD
-
@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz
How can you depend on sudo, but then not have problems when the user doesn't have permission to run sudo?@leeloo @lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz True they should not depend on sudo, they should depend on 'whatever' defined by some config that could be sudo like $EDITOR. sudo is not 'critical infrastructure', just a means to elevate privilege. You can do this without sudo, its a convenience util and maybe not even the right way to do things. I don't really know what to say to "having to call helpdesk when you need a patch". Aaanyway I hope someone supports, perhaps someone that needs sudo.
-
Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years. This is exactly one of those cases where an entire critical infrastructure is held together by the work of a single volunteer who apparently can’t find anyone willing to sponsor him for some financial support. #opensource #linux #foss #GNU
@pafurijaz IBM alone should be sending him a million bux a year. #RedHat
-
Todd C. Miller has been maintaining the #sudo codebase for over 30 years. This is exactly one of those cases where an entire critical infrastructure is held together by the work of a single volunteer who apparently can’t find anyone willing to sponsor him for some financial support. #opensource #linux #foss #GNU
@pafurijaz we need a better way to charge corporations with buckets of cash, as opposed to folks on a shoestring.
Or just outlaw billionaires
-
@leeloo @spacehobo @pafurijaz
I prefer use doas.
But, if there is KDE, I must keep sudo, but I don't use it.
It's my personal computer.
Servers don't have desktop environments.In fact, I need the admin display challenge (that use sudo) when I change the theme for sddm, or lightm.
For people whis computer managed by me, they use doas because I teach them, if I think I can allow them to make some admin task.
@lautreg @spacehobo @pafurijaz
How did servers become part of this discussion? -
@spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
That is an idiotic assumption on a networked multi user system.User needs an admin? Call tech support, admin handles it remotely via ssh.
If the desktop assumes sudo, that might just end up with the user getting to talk to HR and IT security.
@leeloo @spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
``That is an idiotic assumption on a networked multi user system.''
Arguably running a desktop on a networked multi-user system is the idiotic decision. Or not using an immutable OS like #guix, which allows users to safely install their own package requirements, is the idiotic part?
Either way, the problem is architectural (and deep!), not with the desktop per se.
-
@leeloo @spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
``That is an idiotic assumption on a networked multi user system.''
Arguably running a desktop on a networked multi-user system is the idiotic decision. Or not using an immutable OS like #guix, which allows users to safely install their own package requirements, is the idiotic part?
Either way, the problem is architectural (and deep!), not with the desktop per se.
@khleedril @spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
"Or not using an immutable OS like #guix, which allows users to safely install their own package requirements, is the idiotic part?"How would corporate IT prevent people from installing non-approved software in that case?
-
@khleedril @spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
"Or not using an immutable OS like #guix, which allows users to safely install their own package requirements, is the idiotic part?"How would corporate IT prevent people from installing non-approved software in that case?
@leeloo @spacehobo @lautreg @pafurijaz
That can be done. In the case of #guix, the guix application itself could be restricted to the admin user, or users in the sudo group.
