ai, didn't read.brilliant.
-
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@cR0w/116046831070586389
@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
That was a difficult one because the quality was too high to be AI art but the subject matter was truly ridiculous in the best ways
@gbargoud @renwillis @PeachMcD That's truly amazing! Thank you! This is what the internet is really about
-
@gbargoud @renwillis @PeachMcD LOL it wasn't but god you have to link me to that one I'm begging you
It's this one (I'm not up on my art history so I can't investigate based on that). I saved the image to try edge detect, but obviously if the quality is poor enough to start with, it's not going to be conclusive
I see a "I louvre art memes" watermark on it which could be a good place to investigate.
I think it's probably legit, putting text on an existing painting is so much easier than getting an AI generation of a painting that looks good/consistent and I expect the person who made it took the lower effort route
-
I see a "I louvre art memes" watermark on it which could be a good place to investigate.
I think it's probably legit, putting text on an existing painting is so much easier than getting an AI generation of a painting that looks good/consistent and I expect the person who made it took the lower effort route
@gbargoud Yeah I tried looking for that and only came up with a FB group that's either a closed or no longer exists. And I would totally agree that just taking an actual painting would be the easiest, but the fact that I couldn't find anything online (I wanted to credit the original painting) just got my AI-senses tingling
Tbf, as time goes on, the worse my ai-sense gets
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis @mhoye I always parsed "tldr" as "too long died reading", so this would be "AI; died reading" for me.
And yeah. It works.
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis slop;dr
-
@PhieLaidMignon oh totally. thank you
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.DONE
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis this all sounds very good but
People use Threads?
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.Yes but *any* interaction on those sites boosts the post.
Your intent is irrelevant, you're helping them.
Just block. First and always.
-
Yes but *any* interaction on those sites boosts the post.
Your intent is irrelevant, you're helping them.
Just block. First and always.
@adaddinsane yes & no. I know folks who inadvertently and/or mistakenly shared AI generated content.
Let's not assume ill intent. It's getting very hard to know the difference.
Educate first, then if they continue, b-bye!
-
@renwillis this all sounds very good but
People use Threads?
@http_error_418 I know, right? Gross.
-
@renwillis slop;dr
@zaire haha! but doesn't quite have the same rhythm as tl;dr
-
@renwillis @mhoye I always parsed "tldr" as "too long died reading", so this would be "AI; died reading" for me.
And yeah. It works.
-
@zaire haha! but doesn't quite have the same rhythm as tl;dr
@renwillis oh but it does roll off the tounge quite nicely
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis along with ai;dw and ai;dl (didnt laugh)
-
E energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
