Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
30 Beiträge 17 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
    neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #1

    Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

    The last time tech companies offered 100-Year Bonds was, according to Bloomberg,

    the dot com boom.

    kevinmirsky@infosec.exchangeK phillip@social.lolP jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ rootwyrm@weird.autosR huntingdon@mstdn.socialH 9 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    1
    0
    • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

      Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

      The last time tech companies offered 100-Year Bonds was, according to Bloomberg,

      the dot com boom.

      kevinmirsky@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
      kevinmirsky@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
      kevinmirsky@infosec.exchange
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #2

      @neurovagrant 😬

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

        Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

        The last time tech companies offered 100-Year Bonds was, according to Bloomberg,

        the dot com boom.

        phillip@social.lolP This user is from outside of this forum
        phillip@social.lolP This user is from outside of this forum
        phillip@social.lol
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #3

        @neurovagrant buckle up, y’all!

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

          Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

          The last time tech companies offered 100-Year Bonds was, according to Bloomberg,

          the dot com boom.

          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #4

          @neurovagrant I mean, it's a good deal for them. Cash now, pay never since either the corp or the US won't exist by then anyways.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

            Alphabet (Google) launched a massive global bond sale, including a 100-Year Bond.

            The last time tech companies offered 100-Year Bonds was, according to Bloomberg,

            the dot com boom.

            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autos
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #5

            @neurovagrant as usual, Bloomberg can't help themselves. And must omit the facts that are embarrassing.

            That century bond in the dot-bomb era?

            Motorola, in 1997.

            Right as they were cratering from neglecting cellular, struggling in semiconductors, and eating massive losses from Iridium.

            rootwyrm@weird.autosR alessandro@mstdn.caA 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
            0
            • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

              @neurovagrant as usual, Bloomberg can't help themselves. And must omit the facts that are embarrassing.

              That century bond in the dot-bomb era?

              Motorola, in 1997.

              Right as they were cratering from neglecting cellular, struggling in semiconductors, and eating massive losses from Iridium.

              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
              rootwyrm@weird.autos
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #6

              @neurovagrant less than 2 years after Motorola issued that bond, a significant portion of which was earmarked for Iridium?
              Iridium filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the first time. They had to be bailed out and fire-saled, basically wiping out Motorola's investment.

              mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                @neurovagrant as usual, Bloomberg can't help themselves. And must omit the facts that are embarrassing.

                That century bond in the dot-bomb era?

                Motorola, in 1997.

                Right as they were cratering from neglecting cellular, struggling in semiconductors, and eating massive losses from Iridium.

                alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                alessandro@mstdn.ca
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #7

                @rootwyrm @neurovagrant

                I'm no finance wizard, but what's even the point of a 100-year corporate bond? Is it just intended to be bought and sold like an option?

                neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN 8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                0
                • alessandro@mstdn.caA alessandro@mstdn.ca

                  @rootwyrm @neurovagrant

                  I'm no finance wizard, but what's even the point of a 100-year corporate bond? Is it just intended to be bought and sold like an option?

                  neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #8

                  @alessandro @rootwyrm yeah that's more or less my understanding, but am terrible at finance stuff.

                  tldr just another investment vehicle to be traded.

                  npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • alessandro@mstdn.caA alessandro@mstdn.ca

                    @rootwyrm @neurovagrant

                    I'm no finance wizard, but what's even the point of a 100-year corporate bond? Is it just intended to be bought and sold like an option?

                    8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 This user is from outside of this forum
                    8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 This user is from outside of this forum
                    8r3n7@mstdn.ca
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #9

                    @alessandro @rootwyrm @neurovagrant A grift? It’s like selling more shares, without the hassle of voting rights, while still raising cash. The value is fixed, and the cost (interest) comes out of operating expenses, without diluting stock price. But the date of expiry is so far in the future, it’s like they can forget about the consequences and accounting burden of redemption.

                    alessandro@mstdn.caA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • 8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 8r3n7@mstdn.ca

                      @alessandro @rootwyrm @neurovagrant A grift? It’s like selling more shares, without the hassle of voting rights, while still raising cash. The value is fixed, and the cost (interest) comes out of operating expenses, without diluting stock price. But the date of expiry is so far in the future, it’s like they can forget about the consequences and accounting burden of redemption.

                      alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                      alessandro@mstdn.ca
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #10

                      @8r3n7 @rootwyrm @neurovagrant

                      Yeah, I mean from the buyer's POV. The only appeal I can imagine is the prospect of flipping it for a profit ASAP, because obviously nobody is going to hold this for 100 years.

                      neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • alessandro@mstdn.caA alessandro@mstdn.ca

                        @8r3n7 @rootwyrm @neurovagrant

                        Yeah, I mean from the buyer's POV. The only appeal I can imagine is the prospect of flipping it for a profit ASAP, because obviously nobody is going to hold this for 100 years.

                        neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                        neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                        neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #11

                        @alessandro @8r3n7 @rootwyrm it's the epitome of the IBGYBG deal -

                        "I'll Be Gone, You'll Be Gone" by the time this deal actually implodes catastrophically.

                        IBGYBG deals were a hallmark of subprime mortgage security deals in the 00's, leading up to 2008.

                        alessandro@mstdn.caA rootwyrm@weird.autosR 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                          @alessandro @8r3n7 @rootwyrm it's the epitome of the IBGYBG deal -

                          "I'll Be Gone, You'll Be Gone" by the time this deal actually implodes catastrophically.

                          IBGYBG deals were a hallmark of subprime mortgage security deals in the 00's, leading up to 2008.

                          alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alessandro@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alessandro@mstdn.ca
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #12

                          @neurovagrant @8r3n7 @rootwyrm

                          This is even worse, at least CDOs had underlying assets...

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                            @alessandro @8r3n7 @rootwyrm it's the epitome of the IBGYBG deal -

                            "I'll Be Gone, You'll Be Gone" by the time this deal actually implodes catastrophically.

                            IBGYBG deals were a hallmark of subprime mortgage security deals in the 00's, leading up to 2008.

                            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rootwyrm@weird.autos
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #13

                            @neurovagrant @alessandro @8r3n7 exactly. It's why it's getting an "AAA" rating, as though it were as good as a government bond. And it's being done in multiple currencies but primarily sterling.
                            The sold purpose is for the London financial sector to pump and dump it.

                            rootwyrm@weird.autosR wizardofdocs@wandering.shopW 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                              @neurovagrant less than 2 years after Motorola issued that bond, a significant portion of which was earmarked for Iridium?
                              Iridium filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the first time. They had to be bailed out and fire-saled, basically wiping out Motorola's investment.

                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #14

                              @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Oh man, when Google has to file for chapter 11 and fire-sale all of these assets, the flood of cheap enterprise GPU's that are going to hit the market are going to help me build the sickest racing sim ever.

                              rootwyrm@weird.autosR L 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                @neurovagrant @alessandro @8r3n7 exactly. It's why it's getting an "AAA" rating, as though it were as good as a government bond. And it's being done in multiple currencies but primarily sterling.
                                The sold purpose is for the London financial sector to pump and dump it.

                                rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #15

                                @neurovagrant @alessandro @8r3n7 and legally speaking, bonds do have underlying assets in theory. Bonds are secured creditors. But they're not always first in line in a bankruptcy.

                                But the whole game here is that Google will sell at a discount to certain firms. Those firms will sell on direct ("a guaranteed investment!") or will repackage with other bonds into increasingly toxic bundles that pension funds load up on as 'stable return' vehicles.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                  @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Oh man, when Google has to file for chapter 11 and fire-sale all of these assets, the flood of cheap enterprise GPU's that are going to hit the market are going to help me build the sickest racing sim ever.

                                  rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #16

                                  @Mustardfacial @neurovagrant why wait? Mind, they have no graphics output, no real render capability at all even though it's mostly just fused off. But you can buy them for literal pennies on the dollar right now. 94%+ depreciation in 18 months and the secondary is flooded with burned up parts.

                                  mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                    @Mustardfacial @neurovagrant why wait? Mind, they have no graphics output, no real render capability at all even though it's mostly just fused off. But you can buy them for literal pennies on the dollar right now. 94%+ depreciation in 18 months and the secondary is flooded with burned up parts.

                                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #17

                                    @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Unless they've dramatically changed the architecture of the enterprise cards from the last time I interacted with one (which granted was the A6000 series) when there were variants that had mini-DP out, and the physical chips were basically the same as the RTX cards with driver locks to prevent gaming workloads, then it shouldn't be that hard to make work. There are hacked drivers out there that let them play games again.

                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                      @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Unless they've dramatically changed the architecture of the enterprise cards from the last time I interacted with one (which granted was the A6000 series) when there were variants that had mini-DP out, and the physical chips were basically the same as the RTX cards with driver locks to prevent gaming workloads, then it shouldn't be that hard to make work. There are hacked drivers out there that let them play games again.

                                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #18

                                      @Mustardfacial @neurovagrant absolutely not, at all. NV started down the disabling of the render in the mining era. Even the Chinese hack cards have no output. A100's cannot render. V100's cannot render. There's just no silicon or traces for it.

                                      mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                        @Mustardfacial @neurovagrant absolutely not, at all. NV started down the disabling of the render in the mining era. Even the Chinese hack cards have no output. A100's cannot render. V100's cannot render. There's just no silicon or traces for it.

                                        mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mustardfacial@infosec.exchange
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #19

                                        @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Aw crap. Well there goes that plan. 😢

                                        jmax@mastodon.socialJ 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • mustardfacial@infosec.exchangeM mustardfacial@infosec.exchange

                                          @rootwyrm @neurovagrant Aw crap. Well there goes that plan. 😢

                                          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmax@mastodon.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #20

                                          @Mustardfacial @rootwyrm @neurovagrant - It might be a decent fire sale for non-LLM supercomputer users, so there's that much.

                                          neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum