Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
saferinternetday26sid
45 Beiträge 33 Kommentatoren 3 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • tutanota@mastodon.socialT tutanota@mastodon.social

    Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means. 🌐🌍

    Share this & Spread the word!

    #SaferInternetDay26 #SID

    drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
    drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
    drewtowler@mas.to
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #34

    @Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    C 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • tutanota@mastodon.socialT tutanota@mastodon.social

      Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means. 🌐🌍

      Share this & Spread the word!

      #SaferInternetDay26 #SID

      ralph@hear-me.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ralph@hear-me.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ralph@hear-me.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #35

      @Tutanota

      #alttext

      A safer internet IS MADE BY
      Encryption
      Privacy
      Open source

      A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
      Age verification
      Scanning communication
      Tracking & data collection

      #SAFERINTERNETDAY

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • drewtowler@mas.toD drewtowler@mas.to

        @Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #36

        @drewtowler @Tutanota

        Please get some more context if you want to discus that topic because such comments are not helping if your sentences are to vage.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • gonun13@mastodon.socialG gonun13@mastodon.social

          @Tutanota Just a note. Age verification is not mutually exclusive to everything that is on the safer column. If the real world has age requirements in some operations, it's acceptable that the digital world also has the same. Making the Internet lawless is what drives attacks on other liberties.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          soderling@dresden.network
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #37

          @gonun13 @Tutanota Correct, it is only mutual exclusive to privacy.

          gonun13@mastodon.socialG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • S soderling@dresden.network

            @gonun13 @Tutanota Correct, it is only mutual exclusive to privacy.

            gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gonun13@mastodon.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #38

            @soderling No, it is not. Any digital service could query a digital gov ID just for age verification (yes/no signed key) and nothing else is stored in either side. A government audit can run on all users just to make sure they have those signed keys WITHOUT knowing who they are.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • tutanota@mastodon.socialT tutanota@mastodon.social

              Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means. 🌐🌍

              Share this & Spread the word!

              #SaferInternetDay26 #SID

              rbuzz@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rbuzz@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rbuzz@mastodon.social
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #39

              @Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

              C 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • rbuzz@mastodon.socialR rbuzz@mastodon.social

                @Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #40

                @rbuzz @Tutanota
                because it is not make it clear what behave is good or bad. It is really not a all making safer thing than you will think of. It would be force to get more victims because of tabu that topic that has to be discus. Tabu this topics what will be unsafe for minors will get more victims and yes i mean also NSFW Content because that Content will get to people no matter what you will do. The other way around you have to guard minors actively not inactively like that verify stuff.

                C 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • pictor@ohai.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pictor@ohai.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pictor@ohai.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #41

                  @SuperDicq @Tutanota no. NOT free. Secure software is funded software that can afford to invest in a secure platform.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • C chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de

                    @rbuzz @Tutanota
                    because it is not make it clear what behave is good or bad. It is really not a all making safer thing than you will think of. It would be force to get more victims because of tabu that topic that has to be discus. Tabu this topics what will be unsafe for minors will get more victims and yes i mean also NSFW Content because that Content will get to people no matter what you will do. The other way around you have to guard minors actively not inactively like that verify stuff.

                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #42

                    @rbuzz @Tutanota

                    That cat pics your mentioning is because you are referencing Plattforms with Algorithms suggestions and this is made to force your behave to stick to that platform as much time as possible. That is a Dark Pattern and has to be banned from all Plattforms no matter if it is for adults or not. That Algorithms are the worst no matter which Plattform your metioning that using that and no matter if it is SFW or NSFW.

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • tutanota@mastodon.socialT tutanota@mastodon.social

                      Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means. 🌐🌍

                      Share this & Spread the word!

                      #SaferInternetDay26 #SID

                      strigga_@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      strigga_@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      strigga_@mastodon.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #43

                      @Tutanota the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gonun13@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #44

                        @aubrey @soderling They can save it, it's pointless, it's just a valid age verification token. The critical point is the authentication system that by law and governance, would be made in a way where you only authorise an age verification not sharing private data with the digital service OR logging on the government side what site you're trying to use. There are more technical steps available for privacy like key pairs, blockchain, owning your data I would prefer first but it is possible.

                        aubrey@nullgender.comA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • gonun13@mastodon.socialG gonun13@mastodon.social

                          @aubrey @soderling They can save it, it's pointless, it's just a valid age verification token. The critical point is the authentication system that by law and governance, would be made in a way where you only authorise an age verification not sharing private data with the digital service OR logging on the government side what site you're trying to use. There are more technical steps available for privacy like key pairs, blockchain, owning your data I would prefer first but it is possible.

                          aubrey@nullgender.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aubrey@nullgender.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aubrey@nullgender.com
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #45

                          @gonun13 @soderling Well, then the government gives me a token for something. First, they know I requested a token at this time (which is also a privacy problem, but not that big). I give that token to the site I want to use, that is okay still. But then the government asks the site owner to give them all the users with all their tokens. Now the government can match the users with real people based on the tokens they gave out.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • viennawriter@literatur.socialV viennawriter@literatur.social shared this topic
                          Antworten
                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                          • Älteste zuerst
                          • Neuste zuerst
                          • Meiste Stimmen



                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                          • Anmelden

                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                          • Erster Beitrag
                            Letzter Beitrag
                          0
                          • Home
                          • Aktuell
                          • Tags
                          • Über dieses Forum