lol, "if only someone had warned us about this sort of thing?!"
-
-
@Lazarou I'm sorry but this is hilarious
-
@Lazarou meanwhile my ceo
@agasramirez @Lazarou To be fair this argument can be valid to some extent.
Though I feel most of "AI" is overhyped and will just end up locking down users/companies into big tech providing inference for them...
-
@Lazarou God I hope this post is true
-
@Lazarou
So … what’s the problem? It functions exactly as designed! -
@Lazarou “We ran into some trouble setting up an office in West Fobispa. Turned out there was no such place. The whole state of Warmington was a hallucination. That was half of our profits the last fiscal year!”
-
@Lazarou “We ran into some trouble setting up an office in West Fobispa. Turned out there was no such place. The whole state of Warmington was a hallucination. That was half of our profits the last fiscal year!”
@su_liam such incredible faith they put into a machine that they wouldn't put into another human being
-
@agasramirez @Lazarou To be fair this argument can be valid to some extent.
Though I feel most of "AI" is overhyped and will just end up locking down users/companies into big tech providing inference for them...
-
I know this probably makes me a terrible person but I honestly can't _wait_ for the lawsuits.
Added bonus laughs if they use AI to write their legal briefs.
-
@Lazarou I saw a few times in my paid for AI not only data is false but also math - for example the inability to convert base2 and base10, or the inability to differentiate meaning in small and large letters in (throughput) calculations - KB Kb. Basically corrupting the web with millions of "small" errors that humans mostly recognise.
-
@MugsysRapSheet @Lazarou AI has always been a marketing term. What was "machine learning" back when you were probably studying bares little resemblance to Large Language models, but it all get lumped in the same bucket.
Even when criticizing it, we're encouraged to use terms like "hallucinations" that anthropomorphise the systems, instead of using more correct terms like "statistical error".
@jbaggs @MugsysRapSheet @Lazarou It does not at all meet the definition of statistical error, a jargon term in statistics practice. If so we could ask the AI a hundred times and average the results for the correct answer.
-
@jbaggs @MugsysRapSheet @Lazarou It does not at all meet the definition of statistical error, a jargon term in statistics practice. If so we could ask the AI a hundred times and average the results for the correct answer.
-
@jbaggs @MugsysRapSheet @Lazarou It does not at all meet the definition of statistical error, a jargon term in statistics practice. If so we could ask the AI a hundred times and average the results for the correct answer.
@glent@aus.social @MugsysRapSheet @Lazarou No. that would be the "normalized answer" and not necessarily correct at all. Just "average".
-
-
@Lazarou "double checking" and "accident".
EPIC.
seems like today double checking is some kind of failure
-
@Lazarou meanwhile my ceo
@agasramirez @Lazarou all CEOs went to the same "cool kids" CEO school.
-
-
-
@Lazarou God I hope this post is true
It has been moderated away on #Reddit. Several commenters suspect that it is fake.
https://www.reddit.com/r/analytics/comments/1r4dsq2/we_just_found_out_our_ai_has_been_making_up/
Of course their rationales in some cases have been that it cannot be true because the poster and the people in the poster's company certainly would not have been so dumb as to really do this.
