What the, and I cannot overstate this, fuck?

@PeterLG @bloor Oh. My. God...

@c64whiz @bloor Turns out those are mains. (And I guess that's 240?)

Dropping a paper clip might just literally cross the streams.

@sophieschmieg hello "cage dipole".

@bloor #Audiophools are so funny

@greem @bloor

Sure that's all very well, but if you don't make those isolation discs out of 3.7 mm high density PTFE, you're not going to avoid subspace resonance above 67 GHz.

Also you still won't hear the full stereophonic effect unless you sit in that cupboard.

@DrHyde @bloor plain voodoomb

@fwaggle @bloor I found the soundstage was slightly improved at the mid frequencies, but the bass was really muddy.

@bloor audiophiles are the biggest marks. they fall, in large numbers, for the "gold plated TOSLINK" trick.

@bloor >reduce interference
>also reduce shielding
as long as he's having fun and not buying solid gold cables

@bloor
yea, verly!

@bloor

Wacky, but doesn't beat the article where they compared the sound of digital music files stored on an NTFS file system versus those stored on an ext3 file system.

I can't remember which one won, but one of them reliably had a richer, fuller sound.

@bloor tbh, data centers would look way more cool if Ethernet cables looked like that.

@bloor seems legit

@bloor @catsalad

@bloor must not have any cats

@bloor

I mean... it's ... creative?

@bloor | only necessary to get that 96k bit depth 64 hz sound

@flipper @bloor I'm a big fan of optical interconnects with gold-plated connectors

@bloor@bloor.tw Why do I have the urge to see and hamster run thru it?

@PsyChuan @bloor The gold plating improves the digital sound transmission by making the light pulses more resilient to damage in the fiber smh, you just need twenty thousand dollars in equipment to notice that it's there (sarcasm)