Every generation has its own Wuthering Heights, apparently, but I cannot quite get over the incredible 2000s-ness of this 2009 version’s DVD cover, starring Tom Hardy as Professor Heathcliff Snape.
-
And then of course there’s pre-Lovejoy, pre-Deadwood Ian McShane as Heathcliff in the 1967 TV version. A Heathcliff with a firm grasp of how handsome he is. Adam Ant could never.
I’m a huge Lovejoy fan, been rewatching all the episodes free on the Daily Motion website.
-
And then of course there’s pre-Lovejoy, pre-Deadwood Ian McShane as Heathcliff in the 1967 TV version. A Heathcliff with a firm grasp of how handsome he is. Adam Ant could never.
I have not seen the 2003 MTV version. The DVD cover doesn’t quite sell it to me.
Apparently it’s a musical about “Cate” and “Heath” and “Hendrix” (Hindley), also featuring Francis from Malcolm In The Middle.
-
I’m a huge Lovejoy fan, been rewatching all the episodes free on the Daily Motion website.
@DrOinFL I haven’t watched it since it was first on, but I did enjoy it at the time.
-
I have not seen the 2003 MTV version. The DVD cover doesn’t quite sell it to me.
Apparently it’s a musical about “Cate” and “Heath” and “Hendrix” (Hindley), also featuring Francis from Malcolm In The Middle.
@Nickiquote God I love all of that hair and the pouts everyone is sporting
-
I have not seen the 2003 MTV version. The DVD cover doesn’t quite sell it to me.
Apparently it’s a musical about “Cate” and “Heath” and “Hendrix” (Hindley), also featuring Francis from Malcolm In The Middle.
@Nickiquote
Rated 5 trash cans out of 5
️ ️ ️ ️ ️ -
I have not seen the 2003 MTV version. The DVD cover doesn’t quite sell it to me.
Apparently it’s a musical about “Cate” and “Heath” and “Hendrix” (Hindley), also featuring Francis from Malcolm In The Middle.
My goodness, this looks shit.
-
My goodness, this looks shit.
@Nickiquote all i can think about here is how they obviously watched _10 things i hate about you_ first, although it doesn't seem likely they learned much from the experience
-
Every generation has its own Wuthering Heights, apparently, but I cannot quite get over the incredible 2000s-ness of this 2009 version’s DVD cover, starring Tom Hardy as Professor Heathcliff Snape.
@Nickiquote I'm not entirely sure why. I get that it's a landmark work in the genre of profoundly unlikeable people who deeply deserve each other, but surely we only have to endure that once?
-
My goodness, this looks shit.
The book was bad enough ...
-
And then of course there’s pre-Lovejoy, pre-Deadwood Ian McShane as Heathcliff in the 1967 TV version. A Heathcliff with a firm grasp of how handsome he is. Adam Ant could never.
@Nickiquote McShane really has that smouldering darkness going on.
-
My goodness, this looks shit.
@Nickiquote It’s Katherine Heigl, of course it is
-
And then of course there’s pre-Lovejoy, pre-Deadwood Ian McShane as Heathcliff in the 1967 TV version. A Heathcliff with a firm grasp of how handsome he is. Adam Ant could never.
@Nickiquote “I wish it need not have happened in my time.”
-
And then of course there’s pre-Lovejoy, pre-Deadwood Ian McShane as Heathcliff in the 1967 TV version. A Heathcliff with a firm grasp of how handsome he is. Adam Ant could never.
TIL "Heathcliff" isn't just a cartoon cat.
-
TIL "Heathcliff" isn't just a cartoon cat.
@futurebird @Nickiquote no one should terrorise the neighbourhood
-
TIL "Heathcliff" isn't just a cartoon cat.
@futurebird Wuthering Heights would have been weirder if the main character was Garfield.
-
@futurebird Wuthering Heights would have been weirder if the main character was Garfield.
I might have paid more attention to it TBH.
Is there more to it than period romance? Did I miss something good just because I didn't like the kind of people who kept talking about it?
-
I have not seen the 2003 MTV version. The DVD cover doesn’t quite sell it to me.
Apparently it’s a musical about “Cate” and “Heath” and “Hendrix” (Hindley), also featuring Francis from Malcolm In The Middle.
@Nickiquote thank you for bringing this to my attention
-
I might have paid more attention to it TBH.
Is there more to it than period romance? Did I miss something good just because I didn't like the kind of people who kept talking about it?
(Didn't like as a teen. I was very much "ew it has kissing" for most of my early years. I grew up a little... maybe. )
-
I might have paid more attention to it TBH.
Is there more to it than period romance? Did I miss something good just because I didn't like the kind of people who kept talking about it?
@futurebird It’s more gothic and overwrought, but also quite complicated. Like Cathy dies halfway through the book, and a lot of the adaptations stop without telling the rest of the story.
-
(Didn't like as a teen. I was very much "ew it has kissing" for most of my early years. I grew up a little... maybe. )
@futurebird @Nickiquote I don’t like it, because I consider many of the relationships described to be toxic, and the Heathcliff-Catherine… thing… to be borderline abusive. But, uh, tastes vary. I hear some people like it.
