Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. WaPo reports:

WaPo reports:

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
11 Beiträge 9 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    briankrebs@infosec.exchange
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #1

    WaPo reports:

    "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

    "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

    "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

    https://archive.ph/kYFYo

    Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

    briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE S 5 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

      WaPo reports:

      "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

      "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

      "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

      https://archive.ph/kYFYo

      Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

      briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
      briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
      briankrebs@infosec.exchange
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #2

      From the Guardian story:

      “Physical searches of reporters’ devices, homes and belongings are some of the most invasive investigative steps law enforcement can take,” Bruce D Brown, president of the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement.

      “There are specific federal laws and policies at the Department of Justice that are meant to limit searches to the most extreme cases because they endanger confidential sources far beyond just one investigation and impair public interest reporting in general.

      “While we won’t know the government’s arguments about overcoming these very steep hurdles until the affidavit is made public, this is a tremendous escalation in the administration’s intrusions into the independence of the press.”

      Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, demanded a public explanation from the justice department “why it believes this search was necessary and legally permissible”.

      In a statement, Jaffer said: “Any search targeting a journalist warrants intense scrutiny because these kinds of searches can deter and impede reporting that is vital to our democracy.

      “Attorney General Bondi has weakened guidelines that were intended to protect the freedom of the press, but there are still important legal limits, including constitutional ones, on the government’s authority to use subpoenas, court orders, and search warrants to obtain information from journalists.

      “Searches of newsrooms and journalists are hallmarks of illiberal regimes, and we must ensure that these practices are not normalized here.”

      davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD gme@bofh.socialG 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
      0
      • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

        WaPo reports:

        "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

        "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

        "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

        https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

        https://archive.ph/kYFYo

        Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #3

        @briankrebs I said even during the last Trump administration - if I wanted to leak sensitive shit, I'd do it to reporters who aren't in the US on the condition that my info NEVER touches our borders.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

          From the Guardian story:

          “Physical searches of reporters’ devices, homes and belongings are some of the most invasive investigative steps law enforcement can take,” Bruce D Brown, president of the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement.

          “There are specific federal laws and policies at the Department of Justice that are meant to limit searches to the most extreme cases because they endanger confidential sources far beyond just one investigation and impair public interest reporting in general.

          “While we won’t know the government’s arguments about overcoming these very steep hurdles until the affidavit is made public, this is a tremendous escalation in the administration’s intrusions into the independence of the press.”

          Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, demanded a public explanation from the justice department “why it believes this search was necessary and legally permissible”.

          In a statement, Jaffer said: “Any search targeting a journalist warrants intense scrutiny because these kinds of searches can deter and impede reporting that is vital to our democracy.

          “Attorney General Bondi has weakened guidelines that were intended to protect the freedom of the press, but there are still important legal limits, including constitutional ones, on the government’s authority to use subpoenas, court orders, and search warrants to obtain information from journalists.

          “Searches of newsrooms and journalists are hallmarks of illiberal regimes, and we must ensure that these practices are not normalized here.”

          davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          davemwilburn@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #4

          @briankrebs

          Unfortunately, my impression is that previous restrictions on searches of reporters was based more on norms and mutable internal DOJ policies than anything based in law. There are no shield laws at the federal level. Grand juries presented with requests from federal prosecutors for warrants to search reporters supported by probable cause might be hard-pressed to deny them.

          Given the current threat model, reporters are going to have to up their game when it comes to protecting their sources, and consider very carefully how far they're willing to go to protect those sources if served with court orders. Because unfortunately no one is coming to protect them.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

            From the Guardian story:

            “Physical searches of reporters’ devices, homes and belongings are some of the most invasive investigative steps law enforcement can take,” Bruce D Brown, president of the Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement.

            “There are specific federal laws and policies at the Department of Justice that are meant to limit searches to the most extreme cases because they endanger confidential sources far beyond just one investigation and impair public interest reporting in general.

            “While we won’t know the government’s arguments about overcoming these very steep hurdles until the affidavit is made public, this is a tremendous escalation in the administration’s intrusions into the independence of the press.”

            Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute, demanded a public explanation from the justice department “why it believes this search was necessary and legally permissible”.

            In a statement, Jaffer said: “Any search targeting a journalist warrants intense scrutiny because these kinds of searches can deter and impede reporting that is vital to our democracy.

            “Attorney General Bondi has weakened guidelines that were intended to protect the freedom of the press, but there are still important legal limits, including constitutional ones, on the government’s authority to use subpoenas, court orders, and search warrants to obtain information from journalists.

            “Searches of newsrooms and journalists are hallmarks of illiberal regimes, and we must ensure that these practices are not normalized here.”

            gme@bofh.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gme@bofh.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gme@bofh.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #5

            @briankrebs@infosec.exchange
            God I hope she practiced decent opsec for the sake of her sources.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

              WaPo reports:

              "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

              "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

              "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

              https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

              https://archive.ph/kYFYo

              Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

              briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              briankrebs@infosec.exchange
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #6

              This would appear to be related to the probe into the alleged leaker ( h/t @ncweaver )

              https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299.1.1.pdf

              huntingdon@mstdn.socialH S 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                This would appear to be related to the probe into the alleged leaker ( h/t @ncweaver )

                https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299.1.1.pdf

                huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                huntingdon@mstdn.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #7

                @briankrebs @ncweaver

                It would also be related to the intimidation of all journalism.

                ithoughtisawa2@infosec.exchangeI 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • huntingdon@mstdn.socialH huntingdon@mstdn.social

                  @briankrebs @ncweaver

                  It would also be related to the intimidation of all journalism.

                  ithoughtisawa2@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ithoughtisawa2@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ithoughtisawa2@infosec.exchange
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #8

                  @huntingdon @briankrebs @ncweaver Really, only journalism that isn't willing to just repeat their lies.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                    WaPo reports:

                    "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

                    "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

                    "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

                    https://archive.ph/kYFYo

                    Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

                    ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    ericlawton@kolektiva.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #9

                    @briankrebs

                    "Exceptionally rare" for how long?

                    @kataclyst

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                      This would appear to be related to the probe into the alleged leaker ( h/t @ncweaver )

                      https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299/gov.uscourts.mdd.597299.1.1.pdf

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      systemadminihater@cyberplace.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #10

                      @briankrebs @ncweaver One wonder what the material was.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                        WaPo reports:

                        "The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials."

                        "The reporter, Hannah Natanson, was at her home in Virginia at the time of the search. Federal agents searched her home and her devices, seizing her phone, two laptops and a Garmin watch. One of the laptops was her personal computer, the other a Washington Post-issued laptop."

                        "It is exceptionally rare for law enforcement officials to conduct searches at reporters’ homes. Federal regulations intended to protect a free press are designed to make it difficult to use aggressive law enforcement tactics against reporters to obtain the identities of their sources or information."

                        https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/14/washington-post-reporter-search/

                        https://archive.ph/kYFYo

                        Guardian piece: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/fbi-raid-washington-post-hannah-natanson

                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        sjcooke66@mastodon.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #11

                        @briankrebs So someone in the Trumpton regime has seen - and not been so drunk/such a moron that they forgot - The film 'All The Presidents Men'?

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic
                        Antworten
                        • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                        Anmelden zum Antworten
                        • Älteste zuerst
                        • Neuste zuerst
                        • Meiste Stimmen



                        Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                        Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                        Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                        • Anmelden

                        • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                        • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                        • Erster Beitrag
                          Letzter Beitrag
                        0
                        • Home
                        • Aktuell
                        • Tags
                        • Über dieses Forum