"I just found out that it's been hallucinating numbers this entire time."

@Natasha_Jay Sounds plausible.

@Natasha_Jay
He he they are using randomization to make chat bot look more "intelligent"
See this:
https://towardsdatascience.com/llms-are-randomized-algorithms/

@Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt don't trust an llm for anything other than what 1 + 1 is, like NONE of these check themselves and just make things up if there's no solution. and if not ran locally, pretty bad.

@Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt Who would have thought that an algorithm to generate answer shaped noise would produce something with the factual value of dummy text.

@Natasha_Jay Vibe work is not work.

@davidr @Epic_Null @Natasha_Jay Fire the bloody management. They keep pushing for "use more AI". If you don't, you are considered to not be a team player, be obstructive, hinder the company and all these things.

@taurus @Epic_Null @Natasha_Jay @davidr but... But... That would lead right up to the board of directors and shareholders. These people are by definition faultless. The eminent purpose of a corporation is to extract wealth without consequences reaching this select group of shitheads.

@Natasha_Jay

@Natasha_Jay

I don't get it. How did people immediately trust AI as soon as our fascist techbro overlords ordered us to?
Most of our friends ask chat GPT for all their important life decisions now.
It takes extremely obvious fuckups like the Flock Superbowl ad to make people pause for a second. Usually, we gobble up whatever the oligarchs ram down our throats.

@Nerde

@Kierkegaanks @Natasha_Jay I often think the only people AI can actually replace are CEOs . Waxing about vision, constructing strategies without actual content. No concern for actual truth.

@Natasha_Jay Am I supposed to feel sorry for these people? Because I really don't.