Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
profsamlecturetour
39 Beiträge 28 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • wtrmt@mastodon.socialW wtrmt@mastodon.social

    @sundogplanets “This Starlink satellite crashed in the easiest place in the world to find space debris. Is that near your house?”

    #MastoClickBait #Space #spacejunk

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #6

    @wtrmt https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/2nd-piece-of-space-junk-landed-on-saskatchewan-farmland-in-2024-1.7502192

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

      bigmac7464@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigmac7464@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigmac7464@mastodon.social
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #7

      @sundogplanets cape canaveral hit their record for launches last year. i believe it was 109. i used to work down there, and starlinks were going up every week or so.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • nocci@punk.cyber77.deN nocci@punk.cyber77.de shared this topic
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

        warmsignull@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        warmsignull@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        warmsignull@mastodon.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #8

        @sundogplanets So what are your proposed solutions and alternatives? Are you lucky enough to live in an area without light pollution? (regardless of satellites)

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

          dmtomas@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dmtomas@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dmtomas@mastodon.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #9

          @sundogplanets correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.09643 kind of saying that we have at most 11 years (another solar maximum cycle) to basically have 100% probability of a Kessler syndrome more or less locking us from accessing LEO (at least with humans aboard) … and screwing up astronoy for years AND dumping bunch of interesting stuff into the upper layers of atmosphere? If yes - Why The F”&£ we are still allowing any mega-constellations and not downing the ones in orbit?

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

            There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

            1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #10

            @sundogplanets

            Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

            Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

            growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

              There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

              1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

              bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bocops@fosstodon.org
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #11

              @sundogplanets I've just read that they are aiming for at least 12K (potentially 34K) satellites, with an average lifetime of 5-7 years.

              Sorry if this question has been answered elsewhere already, but... is there any information about what 2,000 downed satellites each year will do to our atmosphere, exactly?

              deedeeque@techhub.socialD 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                sarae@ecoevo.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sarae@ecoevo.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sarae@ecoevo.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #12

                @sundogplanets I saw a really bright red shooting star trailing sparks two nights ago when I went out to look for auroras, and wondered if it were a dissolving satellite

                it was traveling south to north in the sky east of my house in coastal Oregon

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

                  grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  grb090423@mastodon.social
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #13

                  @sundogplanets

                  I can only manage a day in a city... and I used to live in London! (I loved it.) Now, give me nature and the countryside, any day 👍👍👍

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • bocops@fosstodon.orgB bocops@fosstodon.org

                    @sundogplanets I've just read that they are aiming for at least 12K (potentially 34K) satellites, with an average lifetime of 5-7 years.

                    Sorry if this question has been answered elsewhere already, but... is there any information about what 2,000 downed satellites each year will do to our atmosphere, exactly?

                    deedeeque@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    deedeeque@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    deedeeque@techhub.social
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #14

                    @bocops @sundogplanets

                    I've heard 40,000.

                    bocops@fosstodon.orgB 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • deedeeque@techhub.socialD deedeeque@techhub.social

                      @bocops @sundogplanets

                      I've heard 40,000.

                      bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bocops@fosstodon.org
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #15

                      @deedeeque That's even worse! I got the 34K from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                        greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        greem@cyberplace.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #16

                        @sundogplanets and then there's TeraWave, which is Jeff's high bandwidth space based 5k+ LEO, 18 MEO constellation which starts launching next year.

                        They just keep on banging 'em up there 🙁

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                          dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dockwalk@mastodon.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #17

                          @sundogplanets
                          is there a map?

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

                            bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bojanlandekic@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #18

                            @sundogplanets scene in a netflix scifi movie: why are the stars following me? Those arent stars those are drones and satepites...run!!!

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                              There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                              1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #19

                              @sundogplanets

                              is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

                              Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                newstik@social.heise.de
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #20

                                @sundogplanets Blue Origin announced TeraWave today.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

                                  Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

                                  growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  growthhexis@theforkiverse.com
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #21

                                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets this sounds like a business opportunity - satellite safety and recycling co. #darkhumor

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #22

                                    @sundogplanets 🤬☹️

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                      nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nead@social.vivaldi.net
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #23

                                      @sundogplanets Keep fighting the good fight, Professor. We need someone to give us accurate information we can rely on.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                        thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #24

                                        @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT thejacenallen@mastodon.social

                                          @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #25

                                          @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                                          crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum