We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
-
@hembrow@todon.eu @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu the EU (as well as other institutions from EU countries) should abandon, as much and as quickly as feasible, all non EU platforms and suppliers.
@bovaz @hembrow @EUCommission When you do this, could you also keep the billionares that destroyed us and sucked our money dry from just transferring all their funds to Europe before our economy crashes?
They're not going to do you any favors anyway. I'd really like it if they died with us instead of just making out and moving over there to be happy.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission well done. Zero tolerance
-
@katzenberger @EUCommission child porn. it was child porn. jesus christ. really hard to call a spade a spade.
You may wish to consider this:
https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/news/why-language-matters/child-sexual-abuse-material
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission You should invite all the EU politicians to join your instance to start a transition.
-
You may wish to consider this:
https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/news/why-language-matters/child-sexual-abuse-material
@katzenberger thanks, for that, i am not a native speaker. so the @EUCommission has an account on a platform that distributed child sexual abuse material. that sounds even more gross. cheers.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission Since Musk restricted this feature to paying customers instead of removing it, it is apparent that X is now a platform for producing and distributing child pornography and should be treated as such.
-
@AlexanderVI @NatureMC @EUCommission Now I'm almost curious enough to have a look at it to see how accurate because this is a very interesting question. The answer is: it can't. It should end up looking too adult like.
That could be part of the thing. We have a President who traded in the real thing. Tossing out some simulations that are adult looking on "accident" would be a very evil, shrewd piece of propaganda these people are fully capable of.
-
So now we're quoting Grok from X directly and calling that a good thing?
I'm sure Musk appreciates the advertising
And I'm sure it's general knowledge that "spicy mode" is a direct Grok reference
You spend a lot of time on Twitter, do you?
OK then
@FinchHaven
1. No
2. I doubt he's even aware of any claimed advertising.
3. No, I had to research it to be certain before I replied.
4. I had an account before Musk. It was crap even then. It was only ever used to contact companies who would only respond if shamed on a public platform. I got rid of it years ago. -
@EUCommission leave X. Period.
JFC, it is so obvious.
@europeancommission should not give Musk any content and legitimacy. Leave X, cut all ties and pass real regulation to hold him criminally responsible for the damage his services cause.
-
@FinchHaven
1. No
2. I doubt he's even aware of any claimed advertising.
3. No, I had to research it to be certain before I replied.
4. I had an account before Musk. It was crap even then. It was only ever used to contact companies who would only respond if shamed on a public platform. I got rid of it years ago.If you don't think people get confused by using an incorrect name for something just check the number of US citizens who voted to get rid of "Obama Care" and are now shocked to find the "Affordable Care Act" is being dismantled.
@EUCommission @FinchHaven -
@stefanfrede @EUCommission it does all make this 'Chat Control' nonsense out to be the con that it is.
@Lazarou @stefanfrede @EUCommission Chat Control, like the British "on line safety act" was never about safeguarding children but controlling the citizenry and safeguarding politicians.
-
@JessFairbairn In good journalism/PR, you are obliged to show if it is a quote! It's quite easy by editing the post with " "! @toxy @EUCommission
@NatureMC @JessFairbairn @EUCommission How helpful! I reckon those little marks could catch on in professional communications.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission Why not leave "X" for now and review the decision once you have received and checked their documents and data? I guess that would speed up the whole process!
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission It is both ironic and shameful that the #EU representatives keep using #X, a social network owned by fascists that call for the abolition of Europe.
Stop feeding plutocrats from the other side of the Atlantic and start taking care of Europe, once for all. If you can't, then have some dignity and leave your seat once for all. -
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission You’ve seen the chat. Add the quotes to “spicy mode”. It takes 10 seconds. Or does the EU knock off at 16:30 CET? Please. We all have a weekend to enjoy.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission Please while you are at it, leave twitter entirely, let it die
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission leave X now, thanks.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
This is supported by the Swedish government and most parties/politicians by their presence there.
Shameful.
-
@EUCommission Since Musk restricted this feature to paying customers instead of removing it, it is apparent that X is now a platform for producing and distributing child pornography and should be treated as such.
@MatthewChat: can you please share the sources of your claim? That is indeed a serious claim if true.
-
We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images:
A detailed request for information on Grok has been sent to X, and we are reviewing the company’s responses. X has been ordered to retain all internal documents and data concerning Grok’s features until the end of 2026. The Digital Services Act is very clear:
In the EU, all platforms have to get their own house in order.
@EUCommission X is *also* aware of this and could disable Grok any time they choose to. They are *knowingly* allowing this to continue, and you are ... asking for information?
