I have looked in USASpending as many ways as I can think of for the record about the CDC grant supporting the Guinea-Bissau vaccine trial.
-
I have looked in USASpending as many ways as I can think of for the record about the CDC grant supporting the Guinea-Bissau vaccine trial.
I searched the name of the sponsoring organization, Bandim.
I searched the location of Guineau-Bissau (and for that matter Denmark).
I looked through all CDC FY2026 grants and contracts between 1.5 million and 1.7 million, because NPR said the grant was 1.6.
I searched for the name of the PI in USASpending and in ClinicalTrials.gov. Some records came up in the latter, but not the hep B trial. -
I have looked in USASpending as many ways as I can think of for the record about the CDC grant supporting the Guinea-Bissau vaccine trial.
I searched the name of the sponsoring organization, Bandim.
I searched the location of Guineau-Bissau (and for that matter Denmark).
I looked through all CDC FY2026 grants and contracts between 1.5 million and 1.7 million, because NPR said the grant was 1.6.
I searched for the name of the PI in USASpending and in ClinicalTrials.gov. Some records came up in the latter, but not the hep B trial.I looked through the ICTRP registrations associated with the sponsor -- nothing recent about hep B.
-
I looked through the ICTRP registrations associated with the sponsor -- nothing recent about hep B.
Surely there must be a clinical trial registration and a record of the grant?
-
Surely there must be a clinical trial registration and a record of the grant?
actually maybe not, I am reading the letter the researchers wrote to The Guardian after a news story about it. The letter is not dated but it must have been after December 19, when the news story ran.
It says "none of the commentators [who criticized the study in the Guardian article] had read the protocol, which has yet to be registered" -
actually maybe not, I am reading the letter the researchers wrote to The Guardian after a news story about it. The letter is not dated but it must have been after December 19, when the news story ran.
It says "none of the commentators [who criticized the study in the Guardian article] had read the protocol, which has yet to be registered"And the protocol was leaked to Inside Medicine, apparently near/on Jan 15. People wouldn't care about reading a leaked protocol if a trial registration with protocol were available publicly.
-
And the protocol was leaked to Inside Medicine, apparently near/on Jan 15. People wouldn't care about reading a leaked protocol if a trial registration with protocol were available publicly.
OK, here is the announcement of the grant in the Federal Register
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/18/2025-23245/notice-of-award-of-a-single-source-unsolicited-grant-to-fund-university-of-southern-denmark-sdu -
OK, here is the announcement of the grant in the Federal Register
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/18/2025-23245/notice-of-award-of-a-single-source-unsolicited-grant-to-fund-university-of-southern-denmark-sduThe FR says the recipient is University of Southern Denmark, but there are no results in USASpending.gov for that recipient (even when there are no other filters selected).
-
E energisch_@troet.cafe shared this topic